Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM–5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM–5 Section II personality disorder model.

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chmielewski ◽  
Camilo J. Ruggero ◽  
Roman Kotov ◽  
Keke Liu ◽  
Robert F. Krueger
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Trait Model

scholarly journals The Association between DSM-5 Personality Pathology Traits and Violence

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Categorical Model ◽  
Trait Model ◽  
The Many

The recently published DSM-5 included a dimensional model of personality pathology, which includes pathological traits. This model is a response to the many criticisms and problems documented with the traditional categorical modal of personality disorders. To date, numerous studies have demonstrated that the trait model is more valid and reliable than the traditional categorical model (Krueger and Markon 2013). This study expands research on the trait model by assessing the association between the DSM-5 traits and propensity for, or attitudes about, violence.

Schizotypal Personality Disorder: An Integrative Review

2012 ◽  
pp. 436-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Kwapil ◽  
Neus Barrantes-Vidal
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Schizotypal Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Schizotypal Personality ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Perceptual Distortions

Schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) first appeared in the American Psychiatric Association diagnostic nosology in 1980. However, its roots stretch back more than 100 years under the guise of labels such as borderline, ambulatory, and latent schizophrenia. It is currently characterized as involving marked interpersonal deficits, cognitive and perceptual distortions, and odd and eccentric behaviors. SPD stands at a unique crossroads in the characterization and treatment of psychopathology in that it is conceptualized both as stable personality pathology and also as a milder manifestation of schizophrenia. SPD’s etiological relation with schizophrenia is supported by extensive genetic, neurobiological, neurocognitive, psychosocial, and clinical research. However, research has also identified biopsychosocial factors that differentiate SPD from schizophrenia and may protect SPD patients from deteriorating into psychosis. The chapter reviews this literature and current controversies surrounding SPD in light of the upcoming release of DSM-5.

Examining the Contribution of Perfectionistic Traits to the Construct Validity of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Azad Hemmati ◽  
Brandon Weiss ◽  
Atefeh Mirani ◽  
Farzin Rezaei ◽  
Joshua D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Alternative Model ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Large Sample ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Do So

Scholars of perfectionism have proposed significant modifications to DSM-5's alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD), such that (1) perfectionism be expanded beyond the inclusion of a singular trait—rigid perfectionism—and (2) perfectionistic traits be specified as trait descriptors of personality disorders (PDs) other than obsessive-compulsive PD. In this study, we evaluate these proposals by examining the degree to which (a) perfectionistic traits are already instantiated in Section II and Section III models of personality pathology; and (b) perfectionistic traits meaningfully augment the construct validity of AMPD PDs. We conducted these approaches in a large sample (N =3D 435) from an Iranian undergraduate population that is atypically found in the literature. Results showed that perfectionistic traits are already fairly well instantiated in Section III Criterion B. Perfectionistic traits minimally improved the construct validity of OCPD, but did not meaningfully do so for other PDs. Future investigation into the clinical utility of perfectionistic traits is needed.

scholarly journals The Association between DSM-5 Personality Pathology Traits and Violence

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (Spring 2017) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marissa Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Categorical Model ◽  
Trait Model ◽  
The Many

The recently published DSM-5 included a dimensional model of personality pathology, which includes pathological traits. This model is a response to the many criticisms and problems documented with the traditional categorical modal of personality disorders. To date, numerous studies have demonstrated that the trait model is more valid and reliable than the traditional categorical model (Krueger and Markon 2013). This study expands research on the trait model by assessing the association between the DSM-5 traits and propensity for, or attitudes about, violence.

A Psychometric Evaluation of a Reduced Version of the PID-5 in Clinical and Non-Clinical Adolescents

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 758-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagila Koster ◽  
Odilia M. Laceulle ◽  
Paul T. Van der Heijden ◽  
Theo Klimstra ◽  
Barbara De Clercq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Late Adolescents ◽  
Dsm 5

Abstract. A dimensional perspective on personality pathology in which trait assessment plays an important role has been proposed in the DSM-5, as represented in the PID-5 measure. In an attempt to increase the feasibility of the personality disorder (PD) assessment process, Maples and colleagues constructed a reduced, 100-item version of the PID-5. This study aimed to replicate and extend previous findings on the psychometric properties of this 100-item PID-5 relying on a non-clinical ( N = 100) and a clinical ( N = 101) sample of mid-adolescents, as well as a non-clinical ( N = 218) and a clinical ( N = 212) sample of late-adolescents. Results indicate that the psychometric properties of the 100-item PID-5 are adequate and similar to the original PID-5 in all samples. Our study provides evidence for extended applicability of the 100-item PID-5 for both clinical and non-clinical adolescents.

Categorical and Dimensional Conceptions of Personality Pathology in DSM-5: Toward a Model-Based Synthesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey M. Strickland ◽  
Christopher J. Hopwood ◽  
Marina A. Bornovalova ◽  
Elizabeth C. Rojas ◽  
Robert F. Krueger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Diagnostic Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Interview Protocol ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Bifactor Models ◽  
Quantitative Synthesis

Symptom-based models, typically operationalized through diagnostic interview, and trait models, typically operationalized via questionnaire inventories, reflect historically competing conceptions of personality disorder (PD). DSM-5 includes models of both types, in Sections II and III, respectively. In this study, we sought to synthesize these alternative conceptualizations by fitting bifactor models to data for both Section II PD symptoms (assessed using the SCID-II interview protocol) and dimensional traits for the six PDs retained in Section III (assessed using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5). Bifactor models fit the data effectively for all six PDs, and trait and symptom indicators both loaded appreciably on general factors reflecting cross-domain PD constructs. These results provide the basis for a principled, quantitative synthesis of categorical/interview and dimensional/self-report approaches to operationalizing and studying PDs, with considerable implications for diagnosis, research, and practice.

Discrepancies in self- and informant-reports of personality pathology: Examining the DSM–5 Section III trait model.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 456-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Carnovale ◽  
Erika N. Carlson ◽  
Lena C. Quilty ◽  
Robert Michael Bagby
Keyword(s):  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Trait Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document