Mother's Early Relationship with her VLBW Infant Scale

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Furman ◽  
Mary Ann O'Riordan
1990 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-127

The preterm, low or very low birth weight (VLBW) infant has several inadequate homeostatic mechanisms, among which renal immaturity is prominent. Maximal renal concentrating ability in the VLBW infant is often less than twice the osmolality of plasma, compared to a fourfold increase in the mature infant. Equally important is the VLBW infant's limited proximal tubular reabsorption of sodium. The mature infant's response to sodium restriction results in over 99.5% of filtered sodium being reabsorbed; in the case of the VLBW infant, sodium reabsorption may be only 97% to 98% from days 4 through 14 of life. As a result of these two important limits, the VLBW infant has a higher water requirement than the full-term infant.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Xiao-ping Luo ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Yan-wei Liu

Umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) is a common operation for vascular access in preterm infants. However, there are complications associated with their use. We here a case of extravasation of the fluids due to misplacement of the catheter causing hepatic collection of TPN in a very low-birth weight preterm (VLBW) infant.


Author(s):  
Cindy Hahamovitch

This chapter reveals the intimate and early relationship between illegal immigration and authorized guestworker programs, a relationship that continues to this day. Guestworker programs had persisted in the postwar period because they appeared to offer a manageable alternative to unregulated migration. However, to the extent that this was managed migration, it was managed to benefit the nation's largest farm employers, not the farmworkers. Managed migration was a success from the growers' perspective, precisely because the Caribbean and Mexican guestworker programs kept wages low and labor plentiful. From the policy makers' perspective, the guestworker programs seemed like sensible and legitimate ways to keep the border open. Temporary worker contracts and guestworkers' deportability added a patina of legality to what was, in essence, a grower-dominated labor recruitment scheme.


Author(s):  
Lise Jaillant

In 1933, Ezra Pound deplored modernism’s transition from “small honest magazines” to large-scale publishing houses. He described Tauchnitz and Albatross as “parasitic publishers,” eager to exploit James Joyce’s fame to make money. But this story leaves aside a central element: the fact that Joyce and Pound had eagerly courted publishers of cheap editions. Only when the interest of these publishers was no longer in doubt did Pound dismiss them as parasites eager to cash in on the growing popularity of modernism. This chapter is organised chronologically, starting with Joyce’s early relationship with Tauchnitz. It shows that the transnational nature of Tauchnitz, a German publisher of Anglophone literature, particularly appealed to expatriate modernists such as Joyce. The chapter then turns to the period from 1929 to 1932, at the time when Max Christian Wegner was manager-in-chief of Tauchnitz and attempted to modernise the company before co-founding Albatross. Wegner understood that titles by Joyce, Woolf and Lewis could appeal to a wide audience in Europe. The last section is on Albatross, a publisher that not only helped to popularise modernist texts, but was also shaped by the modernist movement. Its stylish covers and intrinsic cosmopolitanism exemplify modernism’s growing influence on mainstream culture in the 1930s.


Author(s):  
Robert Kolb

Martin Luther and Desiderius Erasmus played somewhat significant roles in each other’s lives. Their early relationship is not free from a sense of the serious differences that divided them, but it largely reflected their common commitment to the biblical humanist ideas of “back to the sources” and effective rhetoric. Erasmus’ need to demarcate his positions from those of the heretic and outlaw after 1521 strengthened his resolve to demonstrate publicly at least one important difference between them, resulting in his Diatribe (1524), which provoked a debate with Luther over the freedom or bondage of the will, which Luther treated in his De servo arbitrio (On Bound Choice, 1525) and commentary on Ecclesiastes (1526/1532).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document