Systemic Practice Scale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Butler ◽  
Elizabeth Sheils ◽  
Judith Lask ◽  
Trish Joscelyne ◽  
Helen Pote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Practice

scholarly journals Measuring competence in systemic practice: development of the ‘Systemic Family Practice – Systemic Competency Scale’ (SPS)

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Butler ◽  
Elizabeth Sheils ◽  
Judith Lask ◽  
Trish Joscelyne ◽  
Helen Pote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Practice ◽  
Systemic Practice ◽  
Practice Development

scholarly journals Commentary on “Who’s Challenging Who?: a co-produced approach for training staff in learning disability services about challenging behaviour”

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 200-203
Author(s):  
Mark Andrew Haydon-Laurelut ◽  
Karl Nunkoosing
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Psychological Research ◽  
Disability Services ◽  
Challenging Behaviour ◽  
Social Psychological ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Systemic Practice ◽  
Social Psychological Research

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on the article by Flynn et al. Design/methodology/approach In this commentary, the authors will develop some further thoughts about the importance of empathy, its relational nature and place in practice. The authors use some examples from systemic practice to illustrate. Findings Social psychological research underlines the importance of empathy in practice. Systemic practice and other collaborative approaches that ask about the experiences and abilities of people with a learning disability and their networks can support new possibilities as network members are listened to, included and respected. Originality/value The relational nature of empathy and its connection with practice is explored in this paper.

scholarly journals Creating Sustainable Value (CSV) and innovation process under Stakeholder Theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1044
Author(s):  
Iara Tonissi Moroni Cutovoi
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Stakeholder Theory ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Competitive Environment ◽  
Social Dimensions ◽  
Development Working ◽  
Sustainable Practices ◽  
Systemic Practice ◽  
Global Challenges ◽  
Sustainable Value

This article aims to look at how organizations seek to improve their competitiveness through the development of a model that integrates the management and systemic practice form with which relate the economic, social and environmental areas, processes and engagement of stakeholders or interested parties, in the context of sustainability and value of innovation. Methodologically, the study may be considered exploratory and descriptive in relation to the purposes and regards the bibliographic resources. Further, organizations seek to interact in a competitive environment, and through the model of Sustainable value of Hart and Milstein, the innovation and the parties concerned, respectively, with the central point generating sustainable values. Finally. the engagement of stakeholders become increasingly important strategic for enterprises and show how the global challenges associated with sustainable development, working collaboratively, as well as can help to identify strategies through sustainable practices. The article concludes that several successful models of the sustainable generation of value, are possible because of the economic, environmental and social dimensions.

Chains of Persuasion

2018 ◽  
pp. 63-102
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Hertzberg
Keyword(s):  
Political Participation ◽  
Double Standard ◽  
Democratic Deliberation ◽  
Religious People ◽  
Systemic Practice ◽  
Democratic Societies ◽  
The Right

This chapter considers the roles that religious arguments may play in democratic deliberation. Attempts to include religion suffer from three problems: religious arguments are not widely persuasive; some religious people are not open to persuasion from those who do not share their religious commitments; and when those people make religious arguments in democratic discussions, they seem to appeal to a double standard—expecting their fellows to listen to them while they ignore others. These problems are a consequence of improperly understanding the nature of deliberation; when deliberation is considered as a systemic practice in democratic societies, it becomes clear that under the right circumstances, religious arguments can contribute to persuasion and religious people can be persuaded. The required condition is that religions allow internal pluralism and loose affiliation within their communities. Democratic citizens can apply this criterion to assess religious political participation.

scholarly journals Living Life as Inquiry – a Systemic Practice for Change Agents

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Rose Gearty ◽  
Judi Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Data Gathering ◽  
Change Agents ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Environmental Concerns ◽  
First Person ◽  
Extensive Experience ◽  
The Past ◽  
Systemic Practice ◽  
The Many

Abstract The practical orientation of action research, together with its embedded and participative principles, means it is particularly suited to complex, interconnected questions and ‘real life’ systemic issues. In the realm of first-person action research, Judi Marshall’s (1999) influential article “Living Life as Inquiry” described how such research can extend to one’s whole life whereby professional and personal questions can be set within politically relevant frames. Over the past two decades, many students and researchers have worked with and drawn much imaginative inspiration from the idea of living life as inquiry (LLI). However little has been written to describe how the practice develops and the many forms it can take. This article draws on our extensive experience as inquirers ourselves and as educators, working with students and change agents motivated to address social and environmental concerns. Twenty years after the original article we have conducted a reflective review that included surveying the literature, and working in depth with a range of stories and current practices. From this comes a textured expansion of the language and practice of living life as inquiry as it is approached from the specificity of people’s lives. Through narrative and visual textures, we present views into the many different ways LLI is developed through day-to-day practices of experimentation, data gathering, artistic exploration, intervention and reflection. We explore what this means for quality in the enactment of inquiry. The article draws particular attention to the embodied nature of inquiry and seeks to capture its fleeting, processual quality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document