Evidence for a spectral basis of texture perception in bat sonar

Nature ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 331 (6157) ◽  
pp. 617-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Texture Perception ◽  
Bat Sonar

Principles of Perception in Bat Sonar

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Bat Sonar

CHARACTERISATION OF PATTERNS OF CHEWING BEHAVIOUR IN HUMAN SUBJECTS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON TEXTURE PERCEPTION

1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
WENDY E. BROWN ◽  
KEITH R. LANGLEY ◽  
ALAN MARTIN ◽  
HALLIDAY J.H. MacFie
Keyword(s):  
Human Subjects ◽  
Texture Perception ◽  
Chewing Behaviour

scholarly journals Pen-type Sensor for Surface Texture Perception

10.5772/6825 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianming Ye ◽  
Byungjune Choi ◽  
Hyouk Ryeol ◽  
Sungchul Kang
Keyword(s):  
Surface Texture ◽  
Texture Perception

A tactile display for texture perception in virtual environments

2011 ◽  
pp. 653-660
Author(s):  
M Mengoni ◽  
M Germani ◽  
B Colaiocco ◽  
P Morichetti
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Environments ◽  
Tactile Display ◽  
Texture Perception

scholarly journals The Effect of Oral Tactile Sensitivity on Texture Perception and Mastication Behavior in Humans

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace E. Shupe ◽  
Arran Wilson ◽  
Curtis R. Luckett
Keyword(s):  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Tactile Feedback ◽  
Interindividual Variation ◽  
Texture Perception ◽  
Tactile Acuity ◽  
Force Sensitivity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Oral Sensitivity ◽  
The Brain

AbstractMastication behavior is a notable source of interindividual variation in texture perception and could be linked to oral sensitivity. As oral sensitivity declines so does the amount of tactile feedback relayed to the brain, resulting in less effective manipulation or food and a reduced ability to discriminate differences. To address these hypotheses, we measured masticatory behavior and related this to texture discrimination and oral sensitivity. The study was performed on 41 participants in two groups, with high (n = 20) or low (n=21) sensitivity. Oral sensitivity was measured using a battery of tests that included: oral stereognosis, lingual tactile acuity, and bite force sensitivity. Sensitivity to texture changes was measured using a series of triangle tests with confectionaries of different hardness, with masticatory patterns and behaviors being video recorded and analyzed using jaw tracking software. Overall, there was no significant difference between high and low sensitivity participants and their ability to distinguish texture changes. But, there were significantly different trends found between the groups based on their masticatory behaviors including chewing pattern and overall number of chews. But, it was found that multiple masticatory behaviors were being modulated by oral sensitivity, including overall chewing cycles used (p < 0.0001). More, specifically those in the high sensitivity group used more stochastic chewing movements, while those in the low sensitivity group were found to use crescent-shaped chewing cycles. It was also noted that in the high sensitivity group the jaw moved further distances (p < 0.0001) in all phases and moved at a higher velocity when opening (p < 0.0001) but not when closing, when compared to the low sensitivity group. These results help bolster evidence that mastication and oral sensitivity are related.

scholarly journals Stain on texture: Perception of a dark spot having a blurred edge on textured backgrounds

2015 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 209-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Sawayama ◽  
Eiji Kimura
Keyword(s):  
Dark Spot ◽  
Texture Perception

Visual texture perception in formulated chilled dairy desserts

1999 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazlin Imram
Keyword(s):  
Texture Perception ◽  
Visual Texture
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document