scholarly journals The BRCAPRO 5.0 model is a useful tool in genetic counseling and clinical management of male breast cancer cases

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 856-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines Zanna ◽  
Piera Rizzolo ◽  
Francesco Sera ◽  
Mario Falchetti ◽  
Paolo Aretini ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13670-e13670
Author(s):  
Thamara Ferreira ◽  
Thais Ferreira Bomfim-Palma ◽  
Isabelle Joyce de Lima Silva-Fernandes ◽  
Gabriela Espirito Santo Felix ◽  
Inacelli Queiroz De Souza Caires ◽  
...  

e13670 Background: Loss-of-function mutations in PALB2 gene are associated with increased risk for breast cancer and possibly pancreatic, ovarian, male breast, prostate, colorectal as others cancers. In Brazil it has been estimated that up to 1,516 new cases of hereditary breast cancer for 2020 in the North and Northeast regions. Analysis of susceptibility gene mutations helps identify precisely the high-risk patient and their families, whom need specific and personalized clinical management as high-risk individuals. Methods: Twenty-six patients with pathogenic mutations in PALB2 gene identify by next-generation sequencing from states of Bahia (11), Ceará (9), Pernambuco (5) and Rondônia (1) in the North and Northeast regions were analyzed. Results: Most of the patients analyzed had only breast cancer (80%), including two cases of male breast cancer (9,5%); the others were isolated cases of endometrial cancer (4%), breast and pancreas cancers (4%), breast and lung cancers (4%), only ovarian cancer (4%) and ovarian and breast cancers (4%). Most cancers were stage II or III (65%). Family history of cancer was observed in 22/26 (84%); the most common tumors were breast, prostate, pancreas and thyroid. The founder mutations were more frequent in exons: 4 (58%) and 12 (15%). Eleven variants were found as follow: c.1240C > T (19%); c.3256delC (15%); c.1671_1674delTATT (11.5%); c.355delC (11.5%); NC_000016.9:g.(?_23632673)_(23652488_?)del (11,5%). The greatest variety of mutations was found in the state of Bahia, probably due to the greater number of patients included (42%). Conclusions: These data suggest that changes in clinical management of PALB2 patients are needed since the phenotype observed exhibited pattern of hereditary tumors, including male breast cancer. Besides that, PALB2 gene should be included in painel gene analysis in patients from the North and Northeast of Brazil because its high frequency of pathogenic variants.


2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Agrawal ◽  
A. A. Ayantunde ◽  
R. Rampaul ◽  
J. F. R. Robertson

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Eggemann ◽  
A Ignatov ◽  
R Stabenow ◽  
G von Minkwitz ◽  
FW Röhl ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
N Besic ◽  
B Cernivc ◽  
J De Greve ◽  
K Lokar ◽  
M Krajc ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Kyung Joo Park ◽  
Chun Hwan Han ◽  
Jeong Geun Yi ◽  
Joo Hyuk Lee

1999 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 760-762
Author(s):  
Hisatada HIROKAWA ◽  
Wataru RIKIHISA ◽  
Osamu YAMAMOTO ◽  
Yoshinori SUENAGA ◽  
Masakazu ASAHI

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Francesco Bertagna ◽  
Mattia Bertoli ◽  
Tigu Stela ◽  
Giorgio Saladini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095835
Author(s):  
Wei-Ping Li ◽  
Hong-Fei Gao ◽  
Fei Ji ◽  
Teng Zhu ◽  
Min-Yi Cheng ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of male breast cancer patients has not been determined. The aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in men with stage I–III breast cancer, and we hypothesized that some male patients may safely skip adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Male breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyse the factors associated with survival. The propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to evaluate the impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The primary endpoint was survival. Results: We enrolled 514 patients for this study, including 257 patients treated with chemotherapy and 257 patients without. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) but not in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups ( p < 0.001 for OS and p = 0.128 for BCSS, respectively). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group had a higher 4-year OS rate (97.5% versus 95.2%, p < 0.001), while 4-year BCSS was similar (98% versus 98.8%, p = 0.128). The chemotherapy group had longer OS than the non-chemotherapy group among HR+, HER2–, tumour size >2 cm, lymph node-positive male breast cancer patients ( p < 0.05). Regardless of tumour size, there were no differences in OS or BCSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts for lymph node-negative patients (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant effects on both OS and BCSS in patients with stage I (OS: p = 0.100, BCSS: p = 0.858) and stage IIA breast cancer (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Conclusion: For stage I and stage IIA patients, adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve OS and BCSS. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy might be skipped for stage I and stage IIA male breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document