scholarly journals Large-scale transcription factor binding prediction

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1091-1091
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 858-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Yuan ◽  
Meghana Kshirsagar ◽  
Lee Zamparo ◽  
Yuheng Lu ◽  
Christina S. Leslie

BMC Genomics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Hombach ◽  
Jana Marie Schwarz ◽  
Peter N. Robinson ◽  
Markus Schuelke ◽  
Dominik Seelow

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Grau ◽  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
Marcel H. Schulz

AbstractSeveral studies suggested that transcription factor (TF) binding to DNA may be impaired or enhanced by DNA methylation. We present MeDeMo, a toolbox for TF motif analysis that combines information about DNA methylation with models capturing intra-motif dependencies. In a large-scale study using ChIP-seq data for 335 TFs, we identify novel TFs that are affected by DNA methylation. Overall, we find that CpG methylation decreases the likelihood of binding for the majority of TFs. For a considerable subset of TFs, we show that intra-motif dependencies are pivotal for accurately modelling the impact of DNA methylation on TF binding.


2005 ◽  
Vol preprint (2006) ◽  
pp. e130
Author(s):  
Alan M. Moses ◽  
Daniel Pollard ◽  
David A Nix ◽  
Venky N. Iyer ◽  
Xiao-Yong Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 203-221
Author(s):  
Erick I. Navarro-Delgado ◽  
Marisol Salgado-Albarrán ◽  
Karla Torres-Arciga ◽  
Nicolas Alcaraz ◽  
Ernesto Soto-Reyes ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1608-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Schmidt ◽  
Fabian Kern ◽  
Peter Ebert ◽  
Nina Baumgarten ◽  
Marcel H Schulz

BMC Genomics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Hombach ◽  
Jana Marie Schwarz ◽  
Peter N. Robinson ◽  
Markus Schuelke ◽  
Dominik Seelow

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janik Sielemann ◽  
Donat Wulf ◽  
Romy Schmidt ◽  
Andrea Bräutigam

AbstractUnderstanding gene expression will require understanding where regulatory factors bind genomic DNA. The frequently used sequence-based motifs of protein-DNA binding are not predictive, since a genome contains many more binding sites than are actually bound and transcription factors of the same family share similar DNA-binding motifs. Traditionally, these motifs only depict sequence but neglect DNA shape. Since shape may contribute non-linearly and combinational to binding, machine learning approaches ought to be able to better predict transcription factor binding. Here we show that a random forest machine learning approach, which incorporates the 3D-shape of DNA, enhances binding prediction for all 216 tested Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors and improves the resolution of differential binding by transcription factor family members which share the same binding motif. We observed that DNA shape features were individually weighted for each transcription factor, even if they shared the same binding sequence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document