scholarly journals Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Obesity ◽  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Hrabosky ◽  
Marney A. White ◽  
Robin M. Masheb ◽  
Bruce S. Rothschild ◽  
Carolyn H. Burke-Martindale ◽  
...  

Obesity ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Hrabosky ◽  
Marney A. White ◽  
Robin M. Masheb ◽  
Bruce S. Rothschild ◽  
Carolyn H. Burke-Martindale ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos M. Grilo ◽  
Kathryn E. Henderson ◽  
Robert L. Bell ◽  
Ross D. Crosby


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 928-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gero ◽  
Stefanos Tzafos ◽  
Gabriella Milos ◽  
Philipp A. Gerber ◽  
Diana Vetter ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 776-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea E. Kass ◽  
Kelly Theim Hurst ◽  
Rachel P. Kolko ◽  
Elizabeth B. Ruzicka ◽  
Richard I. Stein ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110286
Author(s):  
Tracey Wade ◽  
Jamie-Lee Pennesi ◽  
Yuan Zhou

Objective: Currently eligibility for expanded Medicare items for eating disorders (excluding anorexia nervosa) require a score ⩾ 3 on the 22-item Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). We compared these EDE-Q “cases” with continuous scores on a validated 7-item version of the EDE-Q (EDE-Q7) to identify an EDE-Q7 cut-off commensurate to 3 on the EDE-Q. Methods: We utilised EDE-Q scores of female university students ( N = 337) at risk of developing an eating disorder. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the relationship between the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1-specificity) of cases ⩾ 3. Results: The area under the curve showed outstanding discrimination of 0.94 (95% CI: .92–.97). We examined two specific cut-off points on the EDE-Q7, which included 100% and 87% of true cases, respectively. Conclusion: Given the EDE-Q cut-off for Medicare is used in conjunction with other criteria, we suggest using the more permissive EDE-Q7 cut-off (⩾2.5) to replace use of the EDE-Q cut-off (⩾3) in eligibility assessments.



2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo P. P. Machado ◽  
Carla Martins ◽  
Ana R. Vaz ◽  
Eva Conceição ◽  
Ana Pinto Bastos ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sören Kliem ◽  
Thomas Mößle ◽  
Markus Zenger ◽  
Bernhard Strauß ◽  
Elmar Brähler ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Gideon ◽  
Nick Hawkes ◽  
Jonathan Mond ◽  
Rob Saunders ◽  
Kate Tchanturia ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document