Response to “A critical look at ‘Energy savings, emissions reductions, and health co-benefits of the green building movement’”

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piers MacNaughton ◽  
Xiaodong Cao ◽  
Jonathan Buonocore ◽  
Jose Guillermo Cedeno-Laurent ◽  
John D. Spengler ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-394
Author(s):  
Piers MacNaughton ◽  
Xiaodong Cao ◽  
Jonathan Buonocore ◽  
Jose Guillermo Cedeno-Laurent ◽  
John D. Spengler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
MacNaughton P. ◽  
Cao X. ◽  
Buonocore J. ◽  
Cedeno-Laurent J. ◽  
Spengler J. ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piers MacNaughton ◽  
Xiaodong Cao ◽  
Jonathan Buonocore ◽  
Memo Cedeno ◽  
John Spengler ◽  
...  

Energy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hasanuzzaman ◽  
N.A. Rahim ◽  
R. Saidur ◽  
S.N. Kazi

Facilities ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 264-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana Sagha Zadeh ◽  
Xiaodong Xuan ◽  
Mardelle M. Shepley

Purpose Healthcare projects face multiple obstacles in achieving sustainability. This paper aims to provide information regarding the energy consumption of healthcare facilities, to identify barriers to sustainability and to suggest methods to improve the effectiveness of these buildings. Design/methodology/approach This study investigates sustainability in healthcare buildings by examining national databases about energy use and energy savings. The authors then initiate a dialogue on this topic by interviewing experts in healthcare planning and design regarding the implications of this data, challenges to sustainability and potential solutions to these challenges. Findings An analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration revealed that healthcare facilities rank second among building types in the USA in energy use per square foot and rank fourth in total energy use. Data from the US Green Building Council showed that only 1 per cent of healthcare buildings are registered with the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system, and 0.4 per cent have achieved certification, which is low compared with other building types. Research limitations/implications Research and discussion must continue engaging all stakeholders to interpret the data and identify transformative solutions to facilitate sustainable healthcare design construction and operation. Practical implications It is important to approach sustainability in healthcare from social, economic, environmental and health-related perspectives. The authors identify five major barriers to sustainable healthcare design and construction and discuss 12 practical solutions. Originality/value Given the energy demands of healthcare buildings, facilitating their sustainability has the potential to make a significant difference in national energy use. Empirical research and evidence-based design can potentially help to accelerate sustainability by clarifying impacts and documenting the economic and operational returns on investment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naim Jabbour

Data shows residential energy consumption constituting a significant portion of the overall energy end use in the European Union (EU), ranging between 15% and 30%. Furthermore, the EU’s dependency on foreign fossil fuel-based energy imports has been steadily increasing since 1993, constituting approximately 60% of its primary energy. This paper provides an analytical re-view of diverse residential building/energy policies in targeted EU countries, to shed insight on the impact of such policies and measures on energy use and efficiency trends. Accordingly, the adoption of robust residential green and energy efficient building policies in the EU has increased in the past decade. Moreover, data from EU energy efficiency and consumption databases attributes 44% of total energy savings since 2000 to energy upgrades and improvements within the residential sector. Consequently, many EU countries and organizations are continuously evaluating residential building energy consumption patterns to increase the sec-tor’s overall energy performance. To that end, energy efficiency gains in EU households were measured at 1% in 2000 compared to 27.8% in 2016, a 2600% increase. Accordingly, 36 policies have been implemented successfully since 1991 across the EU targeting improvements in residential energy efficiency and reductions in energy use. Moreover, the adoption of National Energy Efficiency Actions Plans (NEEACP) across the EU have been a major driver of energy savings and energy efficiency. Most energy efficiency plans have followed a holistic multi-dimensional approach targeting the following areas, legislative actions, financial incentives, fiscal tax exemptions, and public education and awareness programs and campaigns. These measures and policy instruments have cumulatively generated significant energy savings and measurable improvements in energy performance across the EU since their inception. As a result, EU residential energy consumption trends show a consistent decrease over the past decade. The purpose of this analysis is to explore, examine, and compare the various green building and energy-related policies in the EU, highlighting some of the more robust and progressive aspects of such policies. The paper will also analyze the multiple policies and guidelines across targeted European nations. Lastly, the study will assess the status of green residential building policies in Lebanon, drawing from the comprehensive European measures, in order to recommend a comprehensive set of guidelines to advance energy policies and building practices in the country. Keywords: Building Policies; Residential Energy Patterns; Residential Energy Consumption; Energy Savings


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document