scholarly journals Dark matter self-interactions from the internal dynamics of dwarf spheroidals

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 907-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Valli ◽  
Hai-Bo Yu
2013 ◽  
Vol 763 (2) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Jardel ◽  
Karl Gebhardt ◽  
Maximilian H. Fabricius ◽  
Niv Drory ◽  
Michael J. Williams

2002 ◽  
Vol 330 (4) ◽  
pp. 778-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Wilkinson ◽  
J. Kleyna ◽  
N. W. Evans ◽  
G. Gilmore

2008 ◽  
Vol 385 (4) ◽  
pp. 1729-1748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavio De Lorenzi ◽  
Ortwin Gerhard ◽  
Roberto P. Saglia ◽  
Niranjan Sambhus ◽  
Victor P. Debattista ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 431 (1) ◽  
pp. L20-L24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Zavala ◽  
Mark Vogelsberger ◽  
Matthew G. Walker

2019 ◽  
Vol 492 (2) ◽  
pp. 2698-2708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Maeder ◽  
Vesselin G Gueorguiev

ABSTRACT The Scale-Invariant Vacuum (SIV) theory is based on Weyl’s Integrable Geometry, endowed with a gauge scalar field. The main difference between MOND and the SIV theory is that the first considers a global dilatation invariance of space and time, where the scale factor λ is a constant, while the second opens the likely possibility that λ is a function of time. The key equations of the SIV framework are used here to study the relationship between the Newtonian gravitational acceleration due to baryonic matter gbar and the observed kinematical acceleration gobs. The relationship is applied to galactic systems of the same age where the radial acceleration relation (RAR), between the gobs and gbar accelerations, can be compared with observational data. The SIV theory shows an excellent agreement with observations and with MOND for baryonic gravities gbar > 10−11.5 m s−2. Below this value, SIV still fully agrees with the observations, as well as with the horizontal asymptote of the RAR for dwarf spheroidals, while this is not the case for MOND. These results support the view that there is no need for dark matter and that the RAR and related dynamical properties of galaxies can be interpreted by a modification of gravitation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 463 (2) ◽  
pp. 1865-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dabringhausen ◽  
P. Kroupa ◽  
B. Famaey ◽  
M. Fellhauer

2013 ◽  
Vol 775 (1) ◽  
pp. L30 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Jardel ◽  
Karl Gebhardt

2020 ◽  
Vol 641 ◽  
pp. A115
Author(s):  
Laurent Nottale ◽  
Pierre Chamaraux

Aims. In order to study the internal dynamics of actual galaxy pairs, we need to derive the probability distribution function (PDF) of true 3D, orbital intervelocities and interdistances between pair members from their observed projected values along with the pair masses from Kepler’s third law. For this research, we used 13 114 pairs from the Isolated Galaxy Pair Catalog (IGPC). Methods. The algorithms of statistical deprojection previously elaborated were applied to these observational data. We derived the orbital velocity PDFs for the whole catalog and for several selected subsamples. The interdistance PDF is deprojected and compared to the analytical profiles expected from semi-theoretical arguments. Results. The PDF of deprojected pair orbital velocities is characterized by the existence of a main probability peak around ≈150 km s−1 for all subsamples of the IGPC as well as for the Uppsala Galaxy Pair Catalog. The interdistance PDFs of both the projected and deprojected data are described at large distances by the same power law with exponent ≈ − 2. The whole distributions, including their cores, are fairly fitted by King profiles. The mass deprojection yields a mass/luminosity ratio for the pairs of M/L = (30 ± 5) in solar units. Conclusions. The orbital velocity probability peak is observed at the same value, ≈150 km s−1, as the main exoplanet velocity peak, which points toward a possible universality of Keplerian structures, whatever the scale. The pair M/L ratio is just seven times the standard ratio for luminous matter, which does not require the existence of nonbaryonic dark matter in these systems.


New Astronomy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cowsik ◽  
Charu Ratnam ◽  
Pijushpani Bhattacharjee ◽  
Subhabrata Majumdar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document