scholarly journals An inhibitory hippocampal–thalamic pathway modulates remote memory retrieval

Author(s):  
Gisella Vetere ◽  
Frances Xia ◽  
Adam I. Ramsaran ◽  
Lina M. Tran ◽  
Sheena A. Josselyn ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. DeNardo ◽  
Cindy D. Liu ◽  
William E. Allen ◽  
Eliza L. Adams ◽  
Drew Friedmann ◽  
...  

Studies of amnesic patients and animal models support a systems consolidation model, which posits that explicit memories formed in hippocampus are transferred to cortex over time1–6. Prelimbic cortex (PL), a subregion of the medial prefrontal cortex, is required for the expression of learned fear memories from hours after learning until weeks later7–12. While some studies suggested that prefrontal cortical neurons active during learning are required for memory retrieval13–15, others provided evidence for ongoing cortical circuit reorganization during memory consolidation10,16,17. It has been difficult to causally relate the activity of cortical neurons during learning or recent memory retrieval to their function in remote memory, in part due to a lack of tools18. Here we show that a new version of ‘targeted recombination in active populations’, TRAP2, has enhanced efficiency over the past version, providing brain-wide access to neurons activated by a particular experience. Using TRAP2, we accessed PL neurons activated during fear conditioning or 1-, 7-, or 14-day memory retrieval, and assessed their contributions to 28-day remote memory. We found that PL neurons TRAPed at later retrieval times were more likely to be reactivated during remote memory retrieval, and more effectively promoted remote memory retrieval. Furthermore, reducing PL activity during learning blunted the ability of TRAPed PL neurons to promote remote memory retrieval. Finally, a series of whole-brain analyses identified a set of cortical regions that were densely innervated by memory-TRAPed PL neurons and preferentially activated by PL neurons TRAPed during 14-day retrieval, and whose activity co-varied with PL and correlated with memory specificity. These findings support a model in which PL ensembles underlying remote memory undergo dynamic changes during the first two weeks after learning, which manifest as increased functional recruitment of cortical targets.


Author(s):  
Erika Atucha ◽  
Celia Fuerst ◽  
Magdalena Sauvage

Studies on patient H.M inspired many experiments on the role of the hippocampus and the neocortex in retrieving recent and remote memories. Cortical regions become increasingly engaged for memory retrieval over time, while conflicting results emerge regarding the engagement of the hippocampus, suggested to be ongoing by some or restricted to the retrieval of recent memories by others. In the study of Lux et al, 2016 we tested that this discrepancy might stem from failing to dissociate CA1 from CA3s contribution to memory retrieval over time as CA3 is known to support computations more sensitive to time than CA1. We also reported that parahippocampal cortical areas with tied anatomical connections with the hippocampus were increasingly engaged over time (Lux et al., elife , 2016). This study used a fear conditioning paradigm as emotionally arousing experiences are better remembered than memories devoid of fear content. Here we address whether the differential contribution of brain regions is a general mechanism also subserving memory retrieval devoid of fear content. We succeeded in developing an object-in-place task to investigate remote memory retrieval up to 6 months and the contribution of CA1, CA3, parahippocampal and prefrontal cortical areas to the retrieval of recent versus very remote memories using a high resolution molecular imaging technique based on the detection of the IEG RNA Arc. Preliminary results show that the disengagement of CA3 and persistent engagement of CA1 seem to be a general mechanism in supporting retrieval of remote memory for events.


2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1113-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Woodard ◽  
Michael Seidenberg ◽  
Kristy A. Nielson ◽  
Sarah K. Miller ◽  
Malgorzata Franczak ◽  
...  

The temporally graded memory impairment seen in many neurobehavioral disorders implies different neuroanatomical pathways and/or cognitive mechanisms involved in storage and retrieval of memories of different ages. A dynamic interaction between medial-temporal and neocortical brain regions has been proposed to account for memory's greater permanence with time. Despite considerable debate concerning its time-dependent role in memory retrieval, medial-temporal lobe activity has been well studied. However, the relative participation of neocortical regions in recent and remote memory retrieval has received much less attention. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrate robust, temporally graded signal differences in posterior cingulate, right middle frontal, right fusiform, and left middle temporal regions in healthy older adults during famous name identification from two disparate time epochs. Importantly, no neocortical regions demonstrated greater response to older than to recent stimuli. Our results suggest a possible role of these neocortical regions in temporally dating items in memory and in establishing and maintaining memory traces throughout the lifespan. Theoretical implications of these findings for the two dominant models of remote memory functioning (Consolidation Theory and Multiple Trace Theory) are discussed.


NeuroImage ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Steinvorth ◽  
Suzanne Corkin ◽  
Eric Halgren

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 487-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-T. Kwon ◽  
J. Jhang ◽  
H.-S. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
J.-H. Han

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Lods ◽  
Emilie Pacary ◽  
Wilfrid Mazier ◽  
Fanny Farrugia ◽  
Pierre Mortessagne ◽  
...  

AbstractMemory reconsolidation, the process by which memories are again stabilized after being reactivated, has strengthened the idea that memory stabilization is a highly plastic process. To date, the molecular and cellular bases of reconsolidation have been extensively investigated particularly within the hippocampus. However, the role of adult neurogenesis in memory reconsolidation is unclear. Here, we combined functional imaging, retroviral and chemogenetic approaches in rats to tag and manipulate different populations of rat adult-born neurons. We find that both mature and immature adult-born neurons are activated by remote memory retrieval. However, only specific silencing of the adult-born neurons immature during learning impairs remote memory retrieval-induced reconsolidation. Hence, our findings show that adult-born neurons immature during learning are required for the maintenance and update of remote memory reconsolidation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 4871-4881 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gilboa ◽  
C. Alain ◽  
Y. He ◽  
D. T. Stuss ◽  
M. Moscovitch

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. DeNardo ◽  
Cindy D. Liu ◽  
William E. Allen ◽  
Eliza L. Adams ◽  
Drew Friedmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document