scholarly journals Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Gutierrez-Sigut ◽  
Marta Vergara-Martínez ◽  
Manuel Perea
Author(s):  
Karen Emmorey

Recent neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies reveal how the reading system successfully adapts when phonological codes are relatively coarse-grained due to reduced auditory input during development. New evidence suggests that the optimal end-state for the reading system may differ for deaf versus hearing adults and indicates that certain neural patterns that are maladaptive for hearing readers may be beneficial for deaf readers. This chapter focuses on deaf adults who are signers and have achieved reading success. Although the left-hemisphere-dominant reading circuit is largely similar in both deaf and hearing individuals, skilled deaf readers exhibit a more bilateral neural response to written words and sentences than their hearing peers, as measured by event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Skilled deaf readers may also rely more on neural regions involved in semantic processing than hearing readers do. Overall, emerging evidence indicates that the neural markers for reading skill may differ for deaf and hearing adults.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-222
Author(s):  
Miguel Lázaro ◽  
Víctor Illera ◽  
Javier Sainz

AbstractWhether morphological processing of complex words occurs beyond orthographic processing is a matter of intense debate. In this study, morphological processing is examined by presenting complex words (brujería -> brujo –witchcraft -> witch), as well as simple (brujaña->brujo) and complex pseudowords (brujanza ->brujo), as primes in three masked lexical decision tasks. In the first experiment, the three experimental conditions facilitated word recognition in comparison to the control condition, but no differences emerged between them. Given the importance of the surface frequency effect observed, a second experiment was conducted. The results fully replicate those observed in the first one, but this time with low frequency targets. In the third experiment, vowels were removed from the stems of primes to reduce the orthographic overlap between primes and targets and, therefore, the influence of the embedded stem effect. The results show facilitative effects only for complex words. However, paired comparisons show no differences between experimental conditions. The overall results show the central role played by the processing of stems in visual word recognition and are explained in terms of current models of morphological processing.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Commissaire ◽  
Adrian Pasquarella ◽  
Becky Xi Chen ◽  
S. Hélène Deacon

Children learning to read in two languages are faced with orthographic features from both languages, either unique to a language or similar across languages. In the present study, we examined how children develop orthographic processing skills over time (from grade 1 to grade 2) with a sample of Canadian children attending a French immersion program and we investigated the underlying factor structure of orthographic skills across English and French. Two orthographic processing tasks were administered in both languages: lexical orthographic processing (e.g. choose the correct spelling from people–peeple) and sub-lexical orthographic processing (e.g. which is the more word-like vaid–vayd?), which included both language-specific and language-shared orthographic regularities. Children’s performances in sub-lexical tasks increased with grade but were comparable across languages. Further, evidence for a one factor model including all measures suggested that there is a common underlying orthographic processing skill that cuts across measurement and language variables. Keywords: orthographic processing; reading; French immersion; bilinguals; second language learners


NeuroImage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 316-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Boros ◽  
Jean-Luc Anton ◽  
Catherine Pech-Georgel ◽  
Jonathan Grainger ◽  
Marcin Szwed ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia M. Holmes ◽  
Aisling M. Malone ◽  
Holly Redenbach

1999 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie (Ruth) S. Schimmel ◽  
Sandra G. Edwards ◽  
Hugh T. Prickett
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie N. Bélanger ◽  
Keith Rayner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document