Genomic analysis of tumors from metastatic pancreatic cancer patients to identify new therapeutic targets

315 Background: The combination of capecitabine plus erlotinib in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer patients has proved beneficial in terms of median survival duration, objective radiological response rate and decrease in tumour marker levels from baseline. In the phase I study of capecitabine and lapatinib carried out in advanced solid tumors, the optimal tolerated regimen was determined to be lapatinib 1,250 mg plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day. At these dose levels, the combination was well tolerated with few grade 3 toxicities and no grade 4 toxicity. Our preclinical work suggested synergistic activity of capecitabine and lapatinib in pancreatic cancer. We initiated a study of this combination in the first-line therapy of metastatic pancreas cancer. Methods: This was a single-arm multicenter study in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The study was designed as a Simons two-stage optimal design and was divided into two stages. The first stage was to recruit up to 12 patients. If at least seven of these patients survived for at least six months, then a further 20 patients would be enrolled into the study. If six or fewer of the initial 12 patients met the specified study survival criteria, the study would be halted. Treatment was to be administered until disease progression or until withdrawal from the study due to unacceptable toxicity or other reasons. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed to evaluate disease response and toxicity of therapy. The study patients received lapatinib 1,250 mg/day, plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 every 21 days. Results: Nine patients were enrolled. Seven of these patients did not achieve the interim protocol response requirement of survival for at least 6 months, to allow for the study to continue to the second cohort of patients. Median overall survival from first dose was 4 months. Median time on treatment was 2 months. There were no objective responses. There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: The addition of lapatinib to capecitabine does not improve overall survival in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Modified IPCW model: A method for adjusting for bias in the estimation of overall survival due to the use of second and third line therapies in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15787 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15787-e15787

Author(s):

N. E. Iznaga Escobar ◽

Patricia Lorenzo Luaces ◽

Lizet Sanchez Valdes ◽

Carmen Valenzuela Silva ◽

Tania Crombet Ramos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Newly Diagnosed

e15787 Background: Nimotuzumab, a unique and affinity differentiated anti-EGFR antibody had been used in combination with gemcitabine on the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate overall survival. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, KPS ≥ 70 %, 18-72 years old, with adequate renal and liver function were included. Pts received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2and nimotuzumab or placebo fixed dose of 400 mg once a wk, for 3 wks, followed by a 1-wk rest (d1, 8, 15, q28) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS and secondary PFS, ORR, CBR, safety and QoL. For OS determination, a KM log-rank test was used and a modified IPCW with a cox regression as a secondary analysis. On this evaluation using a modified IPCW model, 41.7% of pts from treatment arm and 42.7% from control arm who received 2nd and 3rd line treatment were censored after progression, while pts that did not receive 2nd and 3rd line treatment were weighted to compensate for the bias created by censoring switchers to 2nd and 3rd line treatment. Results: 192 pancreatic cancer pts were recruited. Ninety-six pts (62 male and 34 female) with a median age of 67 years, range (31, 83) were randomized to treatment arm and 96 pts (57 male and 39 female) with a median age of 64 years, range (41, 82) were randomized to control arm. In the primary analysis, median OS [95% CI] in the treatment arm was 8.57 mo [5.93, 10.90] vs 6.03 mo [4.97, 7.60] in the control arm. The HR [95% CI], 0.83 [0.62, 1.12] and p = 0.23 and when a modified IPCW model as a secondary analysis was used to remove the effect of 2nd and 3rd line therapies, the median OS was statistically significant with a HR [95% CI], 0.81 [0.67, 0.98] and a p = 0.030. The median PFS [95% CI] was 4.43 mo [3.67, 6.00] in the treatment arm vs 3.47 mo [2.60, 4.03] in the control arm with a HR [95% CI] 0.68 [0.51, 0.92] and p = 0.012. Conclusions: A modified IPCW model had proven that addition of nimotuzumab to gemcitabine increases median overall survival of newly diagnosed chemotherapy-naïve locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00561990.

Download Full-text