Effects of adenosine receptor antagonists on the responses to contrast media in the isolated rat kidney

2000 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon D. OLDROYD ◽  
Lu FANG ◽  
John L. HAYLOR ◽  
Michael S. YATES ◽  
A. Meguid EL NAHAS ◽  
...  

Contrast media can induce both a decrease in renal blood flow and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) when administered to both experimental animals and humans. In the present study we have examined the role of adenosine in mediating these effects using the isolated perfused rat kidney. Kidneys were perfused with a 6.7%-(w/v)-albumin-based perfusate supplemented with glucose and amino acids (n = 6 per group). They were exposed to diatrizoate [20 mg of iodine (mgI)/ml; osmolality 1650 mOsm/kg of water] or iotrolan (20 mgI/ml; osmolality 320 mOsm/kg of water) in the presence or absence of theophylline (10.8 µg/ml), or to diatrizoate in the presence or absence of a specific adenosine A1 receptor antagonist (KW-3902; 2 µg/ml) or a specific A2 receptor antagonist (KF17837; 6 µg/ml). Diatrizoate (n = 6) produced a fall in GFR from 0.65±0.04 to 0.42±0.03 ml·min-1·g-1 (P < 0.05); renal perfusate flow (RPF) also declined, from 36.5±3.8 to 22.0±3.2 ml·min-1·g-1 (P < 0.05). Iotrolan (n = 6) produced a fall in GFR from 0.64±0.02 to 0.48±0.04 ml·min-1·g-1 (P < 0.05) and in RPF from 33.3±3.8 to 24.0±3.0 ml·min-1·g-1 (P < 0.05). Theophylline (10.8 µg/ml) prevented the fall in GFR caused by either diatrizoate (baseline, 0.63±0.05 ml·min-1·g-1; diatrizoate+theophylline, 0.60±0.04 ml·min-1·g-1) or iotrolan (basline, 0.64±0.04 ml·min-1·g-1; iotrolan+theophylline, 0.67±0.05 ml·min-1·g-1), but did not affect the decreases in RPF caused by either agent. KW-3902 (2 µg/ml) also prevented the fall in GFR produced by diatrizoate (baseline, 0.66±0.05 ml·min-1·g-1; diatrizoate+KW-3902, 0.61±0.05 ml·min-1·g-1), while the fall in RPF remained unaffected. KF17837 (6 µg/ml) had no effect on the decreases in either GFR or RPF induced by diatrizoate (n = 6 per group). The results suggest a role for adenosine acting at the A1 receptor in mediating the decrease in GFR induced by contrast media. This effect is independent of a change in renal vascular resistance, and possibly secondary to mesangial cell contraction causing a decrease in the ultrafiltration coefficient.

1996 ◽  
Vol 270 (1) ◽  
pp. F179-F185 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Jocks ◽  
G. Zahner ◽  
U. Helmchen ◽  
U. Kneissler ◽  
R. A. Stahl

To evaluate the effect of antibody and complement on renal hemodynamic changes, glomerular injury was induced in isolated perfused kidneys by an anti-thymocyte antibody (ATS) and rat serum (RS). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal vascular resistance (RVR), and renal perfusate flow (RPF) were assessed over an 80-min period. The possible role of thromboxane (Tx) was tested by the application of the Tx synthesis inhibitor UK-38485 and the Tx receptor blocker daltroban. Perfusion of kidneys with ATS and RS significantly reduced GFR at 10 min (control, 501 +/- 111; ATS + RS, 138 +/- 86 ml.g kidney-1.min-1, significance of F = 0.000) after RS. Similarly, RPF (ml.g kidney-1.min-1) fell from 19.2 +/- 1.8 to 6.1 +/- 2.0 (significance of F = 0.000), whereas RVR (mmHg.ml-1.g.min) increased threefold from 5.2 +/- 0.4 to 17.9 +/- 5.0 at 10 min. These changes were ameliorated by the pretreatment of the rats with daltroban and UK-38485. Addition of erythrocytes to the perfusate increased RVR and GFR, whereas RPF decreased compared with cell-free perfused kidneys. ATS and RS in this preparation also decrease GFR and RPF. The hemodynamic alterations appeared without changes in filtration fraction. Compared with untreated, perfused control kidneys, glomerular Tx formation was significantly increased in ATS and RS perfused kidneys. These data demonstrate that antibody and RS induce impairment of renal hemodynamics, which are mediated by increased Tx formation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Sato ◽  
Ken Nagashima ◽  
Hiroko Nomura ◽  
Harumi Mochizuki ◽  
Toyoko Kashiwagi ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihito Hosokawa ◽  
Masahiro Yamauchi ◽  
Yoshihiko Yamamoto ◽  
Kenji Iwata ◽  
Harumi Mochizuki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document