Probability Learning by Aphasic Subjects

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Brookshire

Nine aphasic and nine nonaphasic patients participated in a two-choice probability learning experiment in which they attempted to turn on a set of red “reinforcement” lights by pressing push buttons. During the first 50 trials, responses on one push button turned on the lights 70 times as often as responses on the other. During the next 50 trials, the reinforcement ratio was 5/1 in favor of the push button that first delivered maximum reinforcement. During the following five 50-trial blocks the ratio was changed successively to 2/1, 1/1, 1/2, 1/5, 1/70. Most aphasic subjects changed their response patterns to accord with the changing reinforcement ratios. Between-subject variability was greater for aphasic subjects than for nonaphasic subjects, and seven aphasic subjects exhibited “perseverative” response patterns in early reinforcement ratios. The performance of two aphasic subjects did not appear to be influenced by the reinforcement ratios in the first session. However, further observation and experimental treatment of these two subjects resulted in appropriate changes in their performance. The results of this study suggest that behavior-shaping techniques involving changing reinforcement schedules can be used in clinical treatment of aphasic patients.

1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 353-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrest W. Young

1968 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 143-144
Author(s):  
Joseph Halpern ◽  
Madison Dengler ◽  
Z. Joseph Ulehla

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-260
Author(s):  
Marion Jacobs ◽  
Norman Tiber

This study investigated the relationship between belief in one's ability to control reinforcements and performance in a binary-choice probability-learning situation under varying conditions of risk. The probability-learning task required S repeatedly to predict whether a red or green bulb would light up next. Red was programmed to occur 75% of the time. The sequence was random and not contingent upon Ss' responses. Rotter's Internal-External scale was used to select Ss who generally believed reinforcements were affected by their own behavior (internals) to compare with individuals who believed that most reinforcements were beyond personal control (externals). The conditions of risk were no-payoff, win or lose, win or break even, lose or break even, and reverse (lose for a correct guess and break even for an incorrect one). Performance on the reverse condition differed from all others, with Ss selecting the objectively more frequent event significantly less often. The difference resulted from the behavior of male externals and female internals, who predicted the less frequent event to avoid loss of chips. This is discussed within the framework of social learning theory.


1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 217-218
Author(s):  
William C. Horne ◽  
Milton E. Rosenbaum

1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-466
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Cautela

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the differential effects of instructions on a two-choice probability task. One set of instructions emphasized the number correct on each side. Another set of instructions emphasized neither of the above. The results indicated that differences in instructions did not lead to differences in subjective probability for the three groups. All groups tended toward matching behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document