scholarly journals Three-dimensional pre-stack Kirchhoff migration of deep seismic reflection data

1999 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Buske
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Ates ◽  
Funda Bilim ◽  
Aydin Buyuksarac ◽  
Attila Aydemir ◽  
Ozcan Bektas ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (12) ◽  
pp. 10,810-10,830
Author(s):  
Michael Dentith ◽  
Huaiyu Yuan ◽  
Ruth Elaine Murdie ◽  
Perla Pina-Varas ◽  
Simon P. Johnson ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Marillier ◽  
Charlotte E. Keen ◽  
Glen S. Stockmal ◽  
Garry Quinlan ◽  
Harold Williams ◽  
...  

In 1986, 1181 km of marine seismic reflection data was collected to 18–20 s of two-way traveltime in the Gulf of St. Lawrence area. The seismic profiles sample all major surface tectono-stratigraphic zones of the Canadian Appalachians. They complement the 1984 deep reflection survey northeast of Newfoundland. Together, the seismic profiles reveal the regional three-dimensional geometry of the orogen.Three lower crustal blocks are distinguished on the seismic data. They are referred to as the Grenville, Central, and Avalon blocks, from west to east. The Grenville block is wedge shaped in section, and its subsurface edge follows the form of the Appalachian structural front. The Grenville block abuts the Central block at mid-crustal to mantle depths. The Avalon block meets the Central block at a steep junction that penetrates the entire crust.Consistent differences in the seismic character of the Moho help identify boundaries of the deep crustal blocks. The Moho signature varies from uniform over extended distances to irregular with abrupt depth changes. In places the Moho is offset by steep reflections that cut the lower crust and upper mantle. In other places, the change in Moho elevation is gradual, with lower crustal reflections following its form. In all three blocks the crust is generally highly reflective, with no distinction between a transparent upper crust and reflective lower crust.In general, Carboniferous and Mesozoic basins crossed by the seismic profiles overlie thinner crust. However, a deep Moho is found at some places beneath the Carboniferous Magdalen Basin.The Grenville block belongs to the Grenville Craton; the Humber Zone is thrust over its dipping southwestern edge. The Dunnage Zone is allochthonous above the opposing Grenville and Central blocks. The Gander Zone may be the surface expression of the Central block or may be allochthonous itself. There is a spatial analogy between the Avalon block and the Avalon Zone. Our profile across the Meguma Zone is too short to seismically distinguish this zone from the Avalon Zone.


2018 ◽  
Vol 477 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Hodgson ◽  
H. L. Brooks ◽  
A. Ortiz-Karpf ◽  
Y. Spychala ◽  
D. R. Lee ◽  
...  

AbstractMany mass transport complexes (MTCs) contain up to kilometre-scale (mega)clasts encased in a debritic matrix. Although many megaclasts are sourced from the headwall areas, the irregular basal shear surfaces of many MTCs indicate that megaclast entrainment during the passage of flows into the deeper basin is also common. However, the mechanisms responsible for the entrainment of large blocks of substrate, and their influence on the longitudinal behaviour of the associated flows, have not been widely considered. We present examples of megaclasts from exhumed MTCs (the Neuquén Basin, Argentina and the Karoo Basin, South Africa) and MTCs imaged in three-dimensional seismic reflection data (Magdalena Fan, offshore Colombia and Santos Basin, offshore Brazil) to investigate these process–product interactions. We show that highly sheared basal surfaces are well developed in distal locations, sometimes extending beyond their associated deposit. This points to deformation and weakening of the substrate ahead of the flow, suggesting that preconditioning of the substrate by distributed shear ahead of, and to the side of, a mass flow could result in the entrainment of large fragments. An improved understanding of the interactions between flow evolution, seabed topography, and the entrainment and abrasion of megaclasts will help to refine estimates of run-out distances, and therefore the geohazard potential of submarine landslides.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Caracausi ◽  
Attilio Sulli ◽  
Maurizio Gasparo Morticelli ◽  
Marco Pantina ◽  
Paolo Censi ◽  
...  

<p>The central Mediterranean is a very complex area constituted by a puzzle of different lithosphere segments, whose geological evolution is controlled by the interaction between the European and African plates. Within this geological domain, the northern Sicily continental margin and adjacent coastal belt represent a link between the Sicilian chain and the Tyrrhenian extensional (back-arc) area in the north-south direction, whereas in the east-west direction a transition from a subduction type B (Ionian-Tyrrhenian) to a continental collisional system, subduction type A, (Sicilian-Maghrebian Chain) is recognized.</p><p>The structure of the lithosphere in this area is matter of a strong debate. Most uncertainties on the geologic evolution of the boundary between the European and African plate at depth rise from the lack, up to now, of constraints and clear evidence of geometry of the lithosphere down to the crust-mantle interface.</p><p>In order to investigate the regional crust-mantle tectonics, here we discuss recent deep seismic reflection data, gravimetric modelling, the regional fluid geochemistry coupled to the seismicity that clearly indicate presence, along this sector of the Central Mediterranean, of a hot mantle-wedging at about 28 km of depth. This wedge lies just below a thick-skinned deformed belt cut by a dense system of faults down to the Mohorovicic discontinuity.</p><p>We also discuss new geochemical data in mineralization (fluorite) of hydrothermal deposits along the main regional faults above the mantle wedge. The mineralization is strongly enriched in saline fluid inclusions that allowed high precision analyses of the trapped volatiles (H<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub> and noble gases).</p><p> Notwithstanding the region is far from any evidence of volcanism (Etna volcano and Aeolian Islands are in about 80km), the new geochemical data highlight the presence of mantle-derived volatiles that degas through the crust (e.g., He isotopes, up to 1.4Ra, Ra is the He isotopic ratio in atmosphere). An excess of heat sourced from the mantle characterizes the region. This is a rare case of occurrence of mantle volatiles together with heat in a collisional system.</p><p>The active regional seismicity indicates that the mantle fluids move from the mantle wedge to the surface, hence across the ductile crust that could be thought as a barrier to the advective transfer of fluids because of its low permeability on long time scales. Here we reconstruct the deep faults by the deep seismic reflection data that works as a network of pathways that actively sustains the advective transfer of the mantle fluids through the entire continental crust.     </p><p>Finally, the new geochemical data strongly supports that 1) the mantle wedge and possible associated magmatic intrusions as the source of the mantle volatiles outgassing in the region. A comparison of the noble gases isotopic signature of fluids coming from the mantle wedge and those emitted from the Mt Etna volcano furnish new constrain on the mantle composition below the central Mediterranean getting new constrains to the processes that controlled the geodynamic evolution of the central Mediterranean (i.e., delamination processes).</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document