Department of Andrology, Erasmus University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (s1) ◽  
pp. 50-53
2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob J. M. Groen ◽  
Peter J. Koehler ◽  
Alfred Kloet

The development of modern neurosurgery in the Netherlands, which took place in the 1920s, was highly influenced by the personal involvement of both Harvey Cushing and Walter Dandy, each in his own way. For the present article, the authors consulted the correspondence (kept at the Cushing/Whitney Medical Library in New Haven and the Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives in Baltimore) of Cushing and Dandy with their Dutch disciples. The correspondence provides a unique inside view into the minds of both neurosurgical giants. After the neurologist Bernard Brouwer had paved the way for sending the Dutch surgeon Ignaz Oljenick overseas, Cushing personally took the responsibility to train him (1927–1929). On his return to Amsterdam, Oljenick and Brouwer established the first neurosurgical department in the country. Encouraged by Oljenick's favorable results, a number of Dutch general surgeons started asking Cushing for support. Cushing strategically managed and deflected these requests, probably aiming to increase the advantage of Oljenick and Brouwer. However, the University Hospital in Groningen persisted in the plans to establish its own neurosurgical unit and sent Ferdinand Verbeek to the US in 1932. Although staying at Cushing's department initially, Verbeek ultimately applied to Walter Dandy for a position of visiting voluntary assistant, staying until the end of 1934. Verbeek and Dandy became lifelong friends. On his return to Groningen, Verbeek started practicing neurosurgery, isolated in the northern part of the country. He relied on the support of Dandy, with whom he kept up a regular correspondence, discussing cases and seeking advice. Dandy, on his part, used Verbeek as the ambassador in Europe for his operative innovations. At the beginning of World War II, Oljenick had to flee the country, which concluded the direct line with the Cushing school in the Netherlands. After Dandy's death (1946), Verbeek continued practicing neurosurgery following his style and philosophy. By the time Verbeek died in 1958, the strong American influence on everyday practice of Dutch neurosurgeons had been established.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1266-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne F. van Rijn ◽  
An K. Stroobants ◽  
Marije Deutekom ◽  
Corinne Lauppe ◽  
Auguste Sturk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kaithlyn Rozenberg ◽  
Et al.

Lohmann 1/M. Pool 2, K. Rozenberg 3, M. Eijken 4, U. Møldrup 5, B.K. Møller 6, J.M. Sierra Parraga 7, M. Hoogduijn 7, L. Lo Faro 3, C. Moers 2, J. Hunter 3, A.K. Keller 1, H. Leuvenink 2, C.C. Baan 7, R.J. Ploeg 3, B. Jespersen 1 Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Introduction Marginal kidneys are increasingly being accepted to decrease waiting time for a transplant. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is a technique that allows delivery of therapies that may help condition or repair the organ prior to transplantation. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) may be able to ameliorate ischaemia reperfusion injury as they possess potent anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties. We investigated the safety and effect of MSCs administered during ex vivo NMP prior to transplantation in a pig auto-transplant model of donation after circulatory death. Methods  Porcine kidneys subjected to 75 min warm ischaemia were retrieved and preserved for 14h by oxygenated HMP (oxHMP) and 4h NMP and then auto-transplantation. Kidneys were randomised to three different intervention strategies (n=7 per group): following 1h NMP, either a vehicle (NMP), 10 million pig MSC (NMP+pMSC) or 10 million human MSC (NMP+hMSC) were intra-arterially infused. The NMP groups were all compared to a control group, where kidneys were only preserved with oxHMP. The pig was re-anaesthetised, the contralateral kidney was removed and the treated kidney was auto-transplanted and the animals were recovered for 14 days. Results Renal blood flow during NMP was no different between the groups (p=0.0685). Post-transplant plasma creatinine increased in all groups but there were no significant differences between the groups (p=0.517). Plasma kidney injury biomarker NGAL was significantly higher in the NMP+pMSC group compared to the NMP (p=0.003) and NMP+hMSC (p=0.017) groups at day 14. On day 14, mGFR significantly improved in the NMP group compared to the control (55 ± 3 vs 42 ± 12 ml/min, p=0.025). No differences in GFR were observed on day 14 in the other groups (NMP+pMSC, p=0.090 and NMP+hMSC, p=0.387). MSC were detectable in biopsies of MSC treated kidney after NMP and post-transplantation. Conclusion NMP alone improved renal graft function compared to oxHMP of DCD kidneys post-transplant. The method of MSC administration during NMP proved to be safe, however in this model MSC treatment did not improve renal function. Nevertheless viable MSC remained detectable in the transplanted kidney at postoperative day 14 which may have an effect on longer term outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document