scholarly journals The X-ray surface brightness profiles of hot galaxy clusters up to $\vec z$ ~ 0.8: Evidence for self-similarity and constraints on $\Omega_\mathsf{0}$

2002 ◽  
Vol 389 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Arnaud ◽  
N. Aghanim ◽  
D. M. Neumann
2006 ◽  
Vol 373 (4) ◽  
pp. 1339-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Roncarelli ◽  
S. Ettori ◽  
K. Dolag ◽  
L. Moscardini ◽  
S. Borgani ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 182-185
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Helsdon ◽  
Trevor J. Ponman

AbstractWe present the largest survey to date of the X-ray properties of loose groups. We derive relations between X-ray luminosity, temperature and velocity dispersion, and also examine the surface brightness profiles of these systems. We find significant departures from the trends seen in galaxy clusters, which we interpret as arising from the effect of galaxy winds, and we briefly compare the properties of these loose groups with those of compact groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 628 ◽  
pp. A43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Käfer ◽  
Alexis Finoguenov ◽  
Dominique Eckert ◽  
Jeremy S. Sanders ◽  
Thomas H. Reiprich ◽  
...  

Context. In the framework of the hierarchical model the intra-cluster medium properties of galaxy clusters are tightly linked to structure formation, which makes X-ray surveys well suited for cosmological studies. To constrain cosmological parameters accurately by use of galaxy clusters in current and future X-ray surveys, a better understanding of selection effects related to the detection method of clusters is needed. Aims. We aim at a better understanding of the morphology of galaxy clusters to include corrections between the different core types and covariances with X-ray luminosities in selection functions. In particular, we stress the morphological deviations between a newly described surface brightness profile characterization and a commonly used single β-model. Methods. We investigated a novel approach to describe surface brightness profiles, where the excess cool-core emission in the centers of the galaxy clusters is modeled using wavelet decomposition. Morphological parameters and the residuals were compared to classical single β-models, fitted to the overall surface brightness profiles. Results. Using single β-models to describe the ensemble of overall surface brightness profiles leads on average to a non-zero bias (0.032 ± 0.003) in the outer part of the clusters, that is an approximate 3% systematic difference in the surface brightness at large radii. Furthermore, β-models show a general trend toward underestimating the flux in the outskirts for smaller core radii. Fixing the β parameter to 2/3 doubles the bias and increases the residuals from a single β-model up to more than 40%. Modeling the core region in the fitting procedure reduces the impact of these two effects significantly. In addition, we find a positive scaling between shape parameters and temperature, as well as a negative correlation of approximately −0.4 between extent and luminosity. Conclusion. We demonstrate the caveats in modeling galaxy clusters with single β-models and recommend using them with caution, especially when the systematics are not taken into account. Our non-parametric analysis of the self-similar scaled emission measure profiles indicates no systematic core-type differences of median profiles in the galaxy cluster outskirts.


2003 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 447-448
Author(s):  
Tamon Suwa ◽  
Asao Habe ◽  
Kohji Yoshikawa ◽  
Takashi Okamoto

We calculate some indicators, which are closely related with galaxy clusters' substructure, for each cluster obtained in numerical simulations in OCDM and ΓCDM, and make a statistical comparison between two models. In ΓCDM the indicators, multipole moment power ratios and center shifts, are larger than those in OCDM. This result is consistent with the analytical prediction; galaxy clusters' formation epoch in ΓCDM is later than in OCDM and then clusters in OCDM are more relaxed than those in ΓCDM. We show that these indicators for X-ray surface brightness are useful tools to distinguish between OCDM and ΓCDM.


2016 ◽  
Vol 460 (2) ◽  
pp. 1898-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Sanders ◽  
A. C. Fabian ◽  
H. R. Russell ◽  
S. A. Walker ◽  
K. M. Blundell

1983 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 231-233
Author(s):  
M. J. Geller ◽  
T. C. Beers

Rich galaxy clusters containing multiple condensations are common. This subclustering affects many cluster properties and provides insight into cluster evolution.“Clumpy” clusters of galaxies are interesting, in part, because N-body simulations indicate that multi-component substructure occurs before complete collapse and virialization (White 1976). Interesting systems can be identified both from x-ray surface brightness maps (Forman et al. 1981) and from contour maps based on galaxy counts (Geller and Beers 1982).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document