CORRELATION BETWEEN THE BOUNDARY ENERGY AND PRECIPITATION IN COPPER-[011] SYMMETRIC TILT BOUNDARIES

1990 ◽  
Vol 51 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-269-C1-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. MONZEN ◽  
K. KITAGAWA ◽  
H. MIURA ◽  
M. KATO ◽  
T. MORI
2004 ◽  
Vol 467-470 ◽  
pp. 807-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Takata ◽  
Kenichi Ikeda ◽  
Fusahito Yoshida ◽  
H. Nakashima ◽  
Hiroshi Abe

In the present study, grain boundary energy and atomic structure of <110> symmetric tilt boundaries in copper were evaluated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. From the simulations, the grain boundary energy of <110> symmetric tilt boundaries depended on misorientation angle and there were large energy cusps at the misorientation angles which corresponded to (111) S 3 and (113) S 11 symmetric tilt boundaries. It was found that the atomic structure of each <110> symmetric tilt boundary was described by the combination of three kinds of structural units which consisted of (331) S 19, (111) S 3 and (113) S 11 symmetric tilt boundaries and two single crystal units which consisted of (110) S 1and (001) S 1 single crystals. From the the analysis of the excess free volume in each grain boundary, it was found that the energy of structural units depended on the excess free volume of the units and that the misorientation dependence of grain boundary energy agreed with that of the free volume in grain boundaries.


2004 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Takata ◽  
Ken-ichi Ikeda ◽  
Fuyuki Yoshida ◽  
Hideharu Nakashima ◽  
Hiroshi Abe

1973 ◽  
pp. 423-435
Author(s):  
M. J. Marcinkowski ◽  
K. Sadananda ◽  
Wen Feng Tseng

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric N. Hahn ◽  
Saryu J. Fensin ◽  
Timothy C. Germann ◽  
Marc A. Meyers

Author(s):  
Kabiru Atiku ◽  
Xue Yang

The objective of this work is to investigate the effects of the concentration of hydrogen atoms at the tungsten Σ5 (310) grain boundary (GB) on the GB energy and the GB pulling force. Tungsten (W) is the most preferred plasma facing material (PFM) for the future nuclear fusion reactors such as in the proposed DEMO (demonstration power plant) and ITER (international thermonuclear experimental reactor — which is at the moment the largest Tokamak nuclear fusion reactor under construction in the world. Tungsten is considered as a PFM because of its excellent thermal properties, low-sputtering yield and high melting point. However, hydrogen (H) atoms have an affinity for tungsten grain boundary, and are trapped there permanently. In addition, it makes it prone to failure. W will be exposed to extremely high fluences of H isotopes. The low-energy H isotopes will be retained in the tungsten material leading to the formation of blisters in W and causes degradation of the mechanical and thermal properties of W. Therefore for safety reason, the effect of hydrogen atoms at the tungsten Σ5 (310) symmetric tilt-GB needs to be investigated. This will greatly aid in better designing of fusion wall materials. In addition, the full understanding of the tungsten grain boundary energy and the force required to pull the grain boundary apart will also help in better material selection. Classic molecular dynamics method was used for the investigation. LAMMPS-a sophisticated, classical atomic and molecular dynamics modelling and simulation software, is a vital tool adopted for the investigation of the effects of hydrogen atoms in tungsten Σ5 (310) symmetric tilt-GB. Tersoff potential for W-H interactions was used for the modelling. The size of the simulation box is 10 × 100 × 10 lattices and it consists of 21262 W atoms. Periodic boundaries were used for all sides of the system. Conjugate gradient method was used for the minimization. The trajectories of the atoms were visualized using visual molecular dynamics (VMD) software. The GB energies are calculated to be −924.060 J/m2, −923.898 J/m2 and −743.414 J/m2 for pure W, W with one H atom and W with 30 H atoms are at the GB respectively. In addition, the forces required to separate the GB apart are 0.0279551eV/Ang for pure W, 0.024789eV/Ang and 0.0185eV/Ang for W with one H and 30 H atoms at the GB respectively. The result shows that hydrogen acts as a grain boundary embrittler and weakens the GB strength. The GB energy reduces as the concentration of hydrogen at the tungsten GB increases. In addition, the more the hydrogen atoms at the tungsten GB the lesser the value of the force required to pull the GB apart. However, the GB energies and pulling forces starts increasing slowly when H atoms exceed a certain number depending on the H atoms distribution around the W GB.


1984 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Farkas

ABSTRACTHard sphere models were used to determine densest configurations in symmetrical [100] and [110] tilt boundaries in compounds with the Ll2 structure. The minimum allowed interatomic distances used in these models were estimated from interatomic potentials and the structures of the intermetallic phases in the binary system. The structural unit model is used to analyze the possible ground states for ordering.Two different cases were analyzed corresponding to compounds with “soft” potentials (i.e. Cu3 Au) and “hard” potentials (i.e. Ni3Al). For the Cu3Au type the grain boundary structures obtained were similar to those reported by other investigators for pure fcc metals. Several boundaries were found to be a “two phase” structure, differing in composition and ordering state. This leads to a certain degree of clustering in the boundaries. The contribution of clustering to the grain boundary energy is calculated in a point approximation based on the first coordination shell.For compounds of the Ni3Al type the structures that are densest were found to be generally diffetent from the low energy configurations of boundaries in, pure fcc metals and Cu3 Au. These configurations preserve order, but are much less dense. The possibility of grain boundary “phases” that are not present in other fcc materials may constitute an explanation for the extreme GB weakness observed in Ni3Al and other Ll2 compounds with high ordering energy.


1985 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Kurishita ◽  
Akira &Ocirc;ishi ◽  
Haruyoshi Kubo ◽  
Hideo Yoshinaga

2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 1010-1015
Author(s):  
Takashi Mizuguchi ◽  
Naoki Takata ◽  
Ken-ichi Ikeda ◽  
Hideharu Nakashima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document