Kinematic versus mechanical alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2 years follow-up: a systematic review

Purpose: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there are any clinical or radiological differences in mechanically aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) compared with kinematically aligned TKA. Methods: This study included retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) and prospective cohort studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications in TKA with kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA). All studies had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results: Five PRCTs published between 2014 and 2020 were included. These studies showed a low risk of bias and were of very high quality. We did not find a superiority of KA compared to MA technique for clinical and radiological outcomes, except in one study which showed a significant difference favoring KA between the two groups for all clinical scores. Conclusion: We found that KA in TKA achieved clinical and radiological results similar to those of MA. The complication rate was not increased for KA TKAs. Studies with longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to prove any benefit of KA technique over MA technique.

Download Full-text

Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using restricted kinematic alignment

The Bone & Joint Journal ◽

10.1302/0301-620x.103b6.bjj-2020-2357.r1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 103-B (6 Supple A) ◽

pp. 59-66

Author(s):

Sarag Abhari ◽

Thomas M. Hsing ◽

Max M. Malkani ◽

Austin F. Smith ◽

Langan S. Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Varus Deformity ◽

Advanced Technology ◽

Kinematic Alignment ◽

Mechanical Alignment ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Total Knee

Aims Alternative alignment concepts, including kinematic and restricted kinematic, have been introduced to help improve clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results, along with patient satisfaction, following TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment. Methods A total of 121 consecutive TKAs performed between 11 February 2018 to 11 June 2019 with preoperative varus deformity were reviewed at minimum one-year follow-up. Three knees were excluded due to severe preoperative varus deformity greater than 15°, and a further three due to requiring revision surgery, leaving 109 patients and 115 knees to undergo primary TKA using the concept of restricted kinematic alignment with advanced technology. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the preoperative limb varus deformity: Group A with 1° to 5° varus (43 knees); Group B between 6° and 10° varus (56 knees); and Group C with varus greater than 10° (16 knees). This study group was compared with a matched cohort of 115 TKAs and 115 patients using a neutral mechanical alignment target with manual instruments performed from 24 October 2016 to 14 January 2019. Results Mean overall patient satisfaction for the entire cohort was 4.7 (SE 0.1) on a 5-point Likert scale, with 93% being either very satisfied or satisfied compared with a Likert of 4.3 and patient satisfaction of 81% in the mechanical alignment group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.006 respectively). At mean follow-up of 17 months (11 to 27), the mean overall Likert, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score, and Knee Society Knee and Function Scores were significantly better in the kinematic group than in the neutral mechanical alignment group. The most common complication in both groups was contracture requiring manipulation under anaesthesia, involving seven knees (6.1%) in the kinematic group and nine knees (7.8%) in the mechanical alignment group. Conclusion With the advent of advanced technology, and the ability to obtain accurate bone cuts, the target limb alignment, and soft-tissue balance within millimetres, using a restricted kinematic alignment concept demonstrated excellent patient satisfaction following primary TKA. Longer-term analysis is required as to the durability of this method. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):59–66.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Outcome and Gait Analysis after Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Between Mechanical and Kinematic Knee Alignment methods with and Average 8 Years Follow Up

10.29007/gclm ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Jong-Keun Seon ◽

Eun-Kyoo Song ◽

Dong-Hyun Lee ◽

Je-Hyoung Yeo

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Gait Analysis ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Kinematic Alignment ◽

Functional Difference ◽

Alignment Method ◽

Knee Alignment ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee

Background: There are limited previous findings detailed biomechanical properties following implantation with mechanical and kinematic alignment method in robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during walking. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between two groups and gait analysis of kinematic, and kinetic parameters during walking to identify difference between two alignment method in robotic total knee arthroplasty.Methods: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to undergo robotic-assisted TKA using either the mechanical (30 patients) or the kinematic (30 patients) alignment method. Clinical outcomes including varus and valgus laxities, ROM, HSS, KSS and WOMAC scores and radiological outcomes were evaluated. And ten age and gender matched patients of each group underwent gait analysis (Optic gait analysis system composed with 12 camera system and four force plate integrated) at minimum 5 years post-surgery. We evaluated parameters including knee varus moment and knee varus force, and find out the difference between two groups.Results: The mean follow up duration of both group was 8.1 years (mechanical method) and 8.0 years (kinematic method). Clinical outcome between two groups showed no significant difference in ROM, HSS, WOMAC, KSS pain score at last follow up. Varus and valgus laxity assessments showed no significant inter-group difference. We could not find any significant difference in mechanical alignment of the lower limb and perioperative complicatoin. In gait analysis, no significant spatiotemporal, kinematic or kinetic parameter differences including knee varus moment (mechanical=0.33, kinematic=0.16 P>0.5) and knee varus force (mechanical=0.34, kinematic=0.37 P>0.5) were observed between mechanical and kinematic groups.Conclusions: The results of this study show that mechanical and kinematic alignment method provide comparable clinical and radiological outcomes after robotic total knee arthroplasty in average 8 years follow-up. And no functional difference were found between two knee alignment methods durning walking.

Download Full-text

Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses

SICOT-J ◽

10.1051/sicotj/2020028 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 ◽

pp. 36 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Victor Pacoret ◽

Etienne Kalk ◽

Ludovic Labattut ◽

Guillaume Girardot ◽

Emmanuel Baulot ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Tibial Component ◽

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Fixation Method ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee ◽

Primary Total Knee

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is the main indication for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is now accepted that cementless implantation of the femoral component provides equivalent results to cemented one, however, the optimal fixation method of the tibial component remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of cemented versus cementless tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty. Materials and methods: We carried out a retrospective, monocentric study, including 109 TKA (Zimmer® Natural Knee II ultra-congruent mobile-bearing) implanted between 2004 and 2010 for primary osteoarthritis, comparing 2 groups depending on tibial component fixation method, one cemented (n = 68) and one cementless (n = 41). Clinical (Knee Society Rating System (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, range of motion) and radiodiological outcomes were assessed at last follow-up with a minimal follow-up of 5 years. Results: Mean follow-up were 8.14 [5.31–12.7] and 8.06 [5.22–12.02] years, respectively, in cemented and cementless groups. The tibial component survival rate was 100% [95CI: 91.4–100] in the cementless group and 97.1% [95CI: 89.78–99.42] in the cemented group (2 aseptic loosenings) (p = 0.27). Radiolucent lines were present in 31.7% (n = 13) of the cementless and 44.1% (n = 30) of the cemented baseplates (p = 0.2). The postoperative KSS knee score was higher in the cementless group (99 ± 3 vs. 97 ± 7.5; p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in KSS function, global KSS and HSS scores. Mean range of flexion was 120 ± 10° in the cementless group and 122.5 ± 15° in the cemented group (p = 0.37). No significant differences were found on the radiographic data or on complications. Conclusion: In this study, the survival rate of the tibial component is not influenced by its fixation method at a mean follow-up of 8 years in osteoarthritis, which confirms the reliability of cementless fixation in primary TKA.

Download Full-text

Difference between Mechanical Alignment in Navigation and Scanogram during Total Knee Arthroplasty

Advances in Orthopedics ◽

10.1155/2019/4096306 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rohan Bhimani ◽

Fardeen Bhimani ◽

Preeti Singh

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Mechanical Axis ◽

Computer Navigation ◽

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

P Value ◽

Mechanical Alignment ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee ◽

The Mean

Introduction. Malpositioning of the implant results in polyethylene wear and loosing of implant after total knee arthroplasty. Scanogram is often used for measurement of limb alignment. Computer navigation provides real time measurements and thus, the aim is to see any association pre- and postoperatively between coronal alignments measured on scanogram to computer navigation during total knee arthroplasty. Material and Methods. We prospectively gathered data of 200 patients with advanced degenerative symptomatic arthritis, who were consecutively selected for primary total knee arthroplasty with computer navigation. Every patient’s pre- and postoperative scanogram were compared to the intraoperative computer navigation findings. Results. The results show that the preoperative mean mechanical axis on navigation was 10.65° (SD ± 6.95) and on scanogram it was 10.38° (SD ± 6.89). On the other hand, the mean postoperative mechanical axis on navigation was 0.69° (SD ± 0.87) and on scanogram it was 2.73° (SD ± 2.10). Preoperatively, there was no significant difference (p value = 0.46) between the two. However, the postoperative outcomes suggest that there was a noteworthy difference, with no correlation between the mean Hip-Knee Ankle Axis (HKA) and intraoperative mechanical axis (p value <0.0001). Conclusion. Postoperative mechanical alignment values after total knee arthroplasty are lower on navigation than measured on standing full length hip to ankle scanogram.

Download Full-text

Residual Mild Varus Alignment and Neutral Mechanical Alignment Have Similar Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritis in Five-Year Follow-Up

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1677497 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (02) ◽

pp. 200-205 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Zhiqi Zhang ◽

Can Liu ◽

Zhiwen Li ◽

Peihui Wu ◽

Shu Hu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Weight Bearing ◽

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Functional Score ◽

Mechanical Alignment ◽

Knee Score ◽

Neutral Group ◽

Total Knee

AbstractThe effect of residual varus on survival rate and function in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis (OA) was considered an important issue for successful primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we compared the midterm clinical and functional outcomes in patients with different residual varus. A retrospective review of 175 patients (219 knees) with varus OA was > 3° for the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) who underwent primary TKA after exclusions and loss to follow-up from 237 patients (281 knees). The mean follow-up period was 5.2 ( ± 1.1) years. Patients were divided into four groups according to the first postoperative HKA angle from weight-bearing full-leg radiographs: “valgus” group (HKA angle > 0°, n = 44), “neutral” group (–3° ≤ HKA angle < 0°, n = 86), “mild varus” group (–6° ≤ HKA angle < –3°, n = 62), and “severe varus” group (HKA angle < –6°, n = 27). Survival analysis, Knee Society Score (KSS, including knee score and functional score), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were compared among the four groups. No knee required revision surgery during follow-up. For the KSS knee score and functional score at the last follow-up, the neutral and mild varus groups were better compared with the valgus and severe varus groups (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between the neutral and mild varus groups (p > 0.05). WOMAC scores of the neutral and mild varus groups were also better compared with the valgus and severe varus groups (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between the neutral and mild varus groups at the last follow-up. The postoperative HKA angle was significantly changed in valgus group between first and at the last follow-up when compared with the other three groups (p < 0.05). Leaving an HKA angle at < 6° varus had the same excellent functional outcome as neutral mechanical alignment after TKA for varus-type OA in the 5-year follow-up, using mechanically aligned technique. Caution is advised when leaving valgus or leaving severe varus after TKA.

Download Full-text

Does Kinematic Alignment Improve Short-Term Functional Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Mechanical Alignment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0037-1602136 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 31 (01) ◽

pp. 078-086 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Yanhong Li ◽

Yuliang Wang ◽

Mingxuan Yang ◽

Shuanke Wang

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Mechanical Axis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Mechanical Alignment ◽

Short Term ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee

AbstractThis meta-analysis was conducted to study whether kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves short-term functional outcomes compared with mechanical alignment without changing the hip–knee–ankle angle. Prospective cohort studies were searched from electronic literature databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid interface), and Cochrane Library (Ovid interface). Total 1,159 records were identified. Six trials involving 561 patients were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The included studies recorded outcomes in the follow-up range from 6 to 34 months. Primary outcomes were to assess the functional outcomes in follow-up, and KA group achieved better performance on WOMAC score (mean difference [MD] = −18.82, 95% CI: −16.06 to −5.58), knee function score (MD = 7.23, 95% CI: 0.52–13.94), Oxford knee score (MD = 4.76, 95% CI: 0.40–9.12), and knee range of flexion (MD = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.09–6.86), whereas other parameters including Knee Society score, knee range of extension, VAS pain score, and the occurrence of the complications were without significant difference (p > 0.05). Second outcomes evaluated the perioperative clinic indexes. Our meta-analysis showed that KA group had a shorter time of operation (MD = −15.44, 95% CI: −27.47 to −3.71) and a longer walk distance before discharge (MD = 53.24, 95% CI: 21.32–85.15) when compared with the MA group, whereas the change in hemoglobin, incision length, knee range of flexion before discharge, and length of stays were without significant difference (p > 0.05). Third outcomes were used to analyze the alignment data. Our study showed that KA had larger angles of femoral component and mechanical axis of the femur (MD = −1.95,95% CI: −2.77 to −1.13), tibial component and mechanical axis of tibia (MD = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.43–2.70), anatomic knee angle (MD = −0.72, 95% CI: −1.33 to −0.11), and operative limb alignment (MD = −1.97, 95% CI: −2.50 to −1.45,) compared with the MA group, but the hip–knee–ankle angles between the two groups were similar. KA provided better functional outcomes and better flexion following short-term follow-up of TKA. However, longer-term follow-up and larger sample studies are needed to put into research in the future.

Download Full-text