scholarly journals Comparison of Low Versus High Volume Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Tolerability for Colonoscopy: A Quality Improvement Study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. e25-e26
Author(s):  
Daniel Bushyhead ◽  
Amelie Tiritilli ◽  
Jason A. Dominitz
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. E673-E683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prateek Sharma ◽  
Carol A. Burke ◽  
David A. Johnson ◽  
Brooks D. Cash

Abstract Background and study aims Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has reduced CRC incidence and mortality and improved prognosis. Optimal bowel preparation and high-quality endoscopic technique facilitate early CRC detection.This review provides a narrative on the clinical importance of bowel preparation for colonoscopy and highlights available bowel preparations. Methods A PubMed search was conducted through June 2019 to identify studies evaluating clinical outcomes, efficacy, safety, and tolerability associated with bowel preparation for CRC screening-related colonoscopy. Results Selecting the optimal bowel preparation regimen is based on considerations of efficacy, safety, and tolerability, in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and preferences. Available bowel preparations include high-volume (4 L) and low-volume (2 L and 1 L), polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions, sodium sulfate, sodium picosulfate/magnesium oxide plus anhydrous citric acid, sodium phosphate tablets, and the over-the-counter preparations magnesium citrate and PEG-3350. These preparations may be administered as a single dose on the same day or evening before, or as two doses administered the same day or evening before/morning of colonoscopy. Ingesting at least half the bowel preparation on the day of colonoscopy (split-dosing) is associated with higher adequate bowel preparation quality versus evening-before dosing (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.9−3.4). Conclusions High-quality bowel preparation is integral for optimal CRC screening/surveillance by colonoscopy. Over the last 30 years, patients and providers have gained more options for bowel preparation, including low-volume agents with enhanced tolerability and cleansing quality that are equivalent to 4 L preparations. Split-dosing is preferred for achieving a high-quality preparation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1380-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sietske Corporaal ◽  
Jan H. Kleibeuker ◽  
Jan J. Koornstra

2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-550
Author(s):  
Wen-Hsin Hsu ◽  
Meng-Shun Sun ◽  
Hoi-Wan Lo ◽  
Ching-Yang Tsai ◽  
Yu-Jou Tsai

Author(s):  
◽  
◽  
◽  

A feasibility study was performed to test a bowel preparation (BP) method that would improve patients’ experience of colon capsule endoscope (CCE) while retaining clinical adequacy. Specifically, the use of high-volume colon irrigation with the Hygieacare® System, HygiPrep™, was tested in conjunction with Medtronic’s PillCam COLON 2 Capsule. This prospective, single-center, and IRB-approved study evaluated HygiPrep use prior to the PillCam COLON 2 procedure instead of the standard split-polyethylene glycol-electrolyte (PEG) oral prep. The study was performed at Austin Gastroenterology (Austin, TX), and all capsule video files were forwarded to a Central Reader to evaluate and compile a study report. Six of the seven (86%) subjects completed both the HygiPrep and PillCam COLON 2 exams and were graded as excellent, good, or adequate by the Central Reader. Patients’ feedback reported positive satisfaction scores for both the HygiPrep and the PillCam COLON 2 procedures. These results support our hypothesis that HygiPrep was as effective as Split-PEG BP. We suggest that the HygiPrep, is a suitable BP for CCE, providing adequate BP and high patient satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document