Planned home birth with a regulated midwife is as safe as hospital birth for low-risk women

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Patricia Aikins Murphy
Midwifery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
Auwalu Muhammed ◽  
Lee Khuan ◽  
Sazlina Shariff-Ghazali ◽  
Salmiah Md Said ◽  
Mairo Hassan

1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1505-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Wiegers ◽  
J. van der Zee ◽  
J.J. Kerssens ◽  
M.J.N.C. Keirse

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Slome Cohain

The belief that hospital birth for low risk pregnancies has better outcomes than planned, attended homebirth is an urban legend. The choice of low-risk women to deliver in hospital is a result of the dominant and irrational human propensities to gossip, to follow the crowd and to cling to irrational hope. Rational analysis shows that planned homebirth with experienced trained attendants has the best outcomes for both mother and newborn for low risk pregnancy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith J. McIntyre

The Australian government has announced major reforms with the move to a primary maternity care model. The direction of the reforms remains contentious; with the Australian Medical Association warning that the introduction of non-medically led services will compromise current high standards in maternity services and threaten the safety of mothers and babies. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a critical review of the literature to determine whether there is convincing evidence to support the safety of non-medically led models of primary maternity care. Twenty-two non-randomised international studies were included representing midwifery-led care, birth centre care and home birth. Comparative outcome measurements included: perinatal mortality; perinatal morbidity; rates of medical intervention in labour; and antenatal and intrapartum referral and transfer rates. Findings support those of the three Cochrane reviews, that there is sufficient international evidence to support the conclusion of no difference in outcomes associated with low risk women in midwifery-led, birth centre and home birth models compared with standard hospital or obstetric care. These findings are limited to services involving qualified midwives working within rigorous exclusion, assessment and referral guidelines, limiting the number of urgent intrapartum transfers that come with increased risk of perinatal mortality. What is known about the topic? Systematic reviews of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with midwifery-led care when compared to conventional intrapartum hospital care concluded that these non-medically led models of care are associated with several benefits for low risk women and their babies with no identified adverse effects. What does this paper add? The finding of no difference in outcomes associated with midwifery-led, birth centre and home birth compared with standard hospital or obstetric care is limited to international studies involving women in the care of qualified midwives working within rigorous guidelines for practice involving inter-professionally agreed exclusion, assessment and referral criteria. What are the implications for practitioners? Midwives caring for women in non-medically led models are urged to be vigilant to the need for early detection and prompt action in the event of unforseen complications to avoid an over emphasis on normality. This decreases the likelihood of urgent intrapartum transfers that come with an increased risk of perinatal mortality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane W. Wasden ◽  
Stephen T. Chasen ◽  
Jeffrey M. Perlman ◽  
Jessica L. Illuzzi ◽  
Frank A. Chervenak ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:To evaluate the association between planned home birth and neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).Methods:This is a case-control study in which a database of neonates who underwent head cooling for HIE at our institution from 2007 to 2011 was linked to New York City (NYC) vital records. Four normal controls per case were then randomly selected from the birth certificate data after matching for year of birth, geographic location, and gestational age. Demographic and obstetric information was obtained from the vital records for both the cases and controls. Location of birth was analyzed as hospital or out of hospital birth. Details from the out of hospital deliveries were reviewed to determine if the delivery was a planned home birth. Maternal and pregnancy characteristics were examined as covariates and potential confounders. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of HIE by intended location of delivery.Results:Sixty-nine neonates who underwent head cooling for HIE had available vital record data on their births. The 69 cases were matched to 276 normal controls. After adjusting for pregnancy characteristics and mode of delivery, neonates with HIE had a 44.0-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–256.4] odds of having delivered out of hospital, whether unplanned or planned. Infants with HIE had a 21.0-fold (95% CI 1.7–256.4) increase in adjusted odds of having had a planned home birth compared to infants without HIE.Conclusion:Out of hospital birth, whether planned home birth or unplanned out of hospital birth, is associated with an increase in the odds of neonatal HIE.


MUSAS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Mª Martínez-Mollá ◽  
José Siles ◽  
Mª del Carmen Solano

Objectives This study aims to identify the reasons why couples prefer home over hospital birth. Methodology The methodology is an ethnographic qualitative research design carried out in the Alicante Province between 2009 and 2014. Eleven couples that had had at least one planned home birth took part in the study. Twenty-one in-depth interviews and two life stories were carried out and five written records were obtained. For the analysis of the results, we relied on ethnography, the structural-dialectic model, and the software package ATLAS-ti v6.2. Results Three categories were identified: values, beliefs, and wishes. Among the values, it was highlighted that the participants were socially committed and critical with the system. The men were protective, respectful and participative, while the women were highly empowered, confident in their intuition and their capacity to give birth. They believe that delivery is a natural process that usually proceeds normally, a family act and a meaningful moment. Concerning home birth, they consider that there is less risk, their wishes are respected, and the father has a bigger role, contrary to what happens in a hospital birth. Participants wished to continue the tradition and for their rights to be respected and avoiding obstetric violence. Conclusions With their decision, these couples manifested their disagreement with some beliefs rooted in society and thus they refused hospital birth. When comparing the attention received both at home and at the hospital, they chose home birth to avoid obstetric violence and to have their beliefs and values respected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document