Correction: A unique technique for the removal of threaded biliary inside plastic stents

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Yokode ◽  
Tomoaki Matsumori ◽  
Norimitsu Uza ◽  
Hirokazu Okada ◽  
Takeshi Kuwada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Stents

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents in chronic pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Yeon Suk Kim ◽  
Eui Joo Kim ◽  
Hee Seung Lee ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Spontaneous Migration

AbstractChronic pancreatitis (CP) related main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture has been a challenge for endoscopists. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) has been tried in CP patients, but the efficacy and safety are still controversial. Thus, we aim to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of FC-SEMS vs. plastic stent placement in persistent MPD strictures secondary to CP. Between 2007 and 2018, 80 chronic pancreatitis patients (58 males, median age 49 years), who underwent endoscopic placement of FC-SEMS (n = 26) and plastic stent (n = 54) for persistent MPD strictures after at least 3 months of initial single plastic stenting, were retrospectively analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 33.7 months. As a result, MPD stricture resolution rate was statistically higher in FC-SEMS group (87.0% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001). Although immediate complications occurred similarly (38.5% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.902), spontaneous migration (26.9%) and de novo strictures (23.1%) were pronounced delayed complications in FC-SEMS group. Pain relief during follow-up was significantly higher in FC-SEMS group (76.9% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.046). The total procedure cost was similar in both groups ($1,455.6 vs. $1,596.9, p = 0.486). In comparison with plastic stent, FC-SEMS placement for persistent MPD strictures had favorable long-term clinical efficacy, with its typical complications like spontaneous migration and de novo strictures.

scholarly journals Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis after biliary stenting with self-expandable metal stents vs. plastic stents in benign and malignant obstructions

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
pp. E888-E894
Author(s):  
Nichol S. Martinez ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Sheila N. Firoozan ◽  
Stephanie Izard ◽  
Calvin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Stent Type ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stent

Abstract Background and study aims There are conflicting data regarding the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) compared to polyethylene stents (PS) in malignant biliary obstructions and limited data related to benign obstructions. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of 1136 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction and received SEMS or PS at a tertiary-care medical center between January 2011 and October 2016. We evaluated the association between stent type (SEMS vs PS) and PEP in malignant and benign biliary obstructions. Results Among the 1136 patients included in our study, 399 had SEMS placed and 737 had PS placed. Patients with PS were more likely to have pancreatic duct cannulation, pancreatic duct stent placement, double guidewire technique, sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty as compared to the SEMS group. On multivariate analysis, PEP rates were higher in the SEMS group (8.0 %) versus the PS group (4.8 %) (OR 2.27 [CI, 1.22, 4.24]) for all obstructions. For malignant obstructions, PEP rates were 7.8 % and 6.6 % for SEMS and plastic stents, respectively (OR 1.54 [CI, 0.72, 3.30]). For benign obstructions the PEP rate was higher in the SEMS group (8.8 %) compared to the PS group (4.2 %) (OR 3.67 [CI, 1.50, 8.97]). No significant differences between PEP severity were identified based on stent type when stratified based on benign and malignant. Conclusions PEP rates were higher when SEMS were used for benign obstruction as compared to PS. For malignant obstruction, no difference was identified in PEP rates with use of SEMS vs PS.

scholarly journals Cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection for refractory post liver transplant anastomotic strictures: a rescue case series

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 263177451986778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomazo Franzini ◽  
Vitor M.T. Sagae ◽  
Hugo G. Guedes ◽  
Paulo Sakai ◽  
Daniel R. Waisberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Metallic Stents ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Biliary Strictures ◽  
Anastomotic Strictures ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stents

Background and aims: Post liver transplant biliary anastomotic strictures have traditionally been treated with balloon dilation and multiple plastic stents. Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents may be used as an initial alternative or after multiple plastic stents failure. Refractory strictures can occur in 10–22% and require revisional surgery. Alternatively, cholangioscopy allows direct visualization and therapeutic approaches. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of balloon dilation combined with cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection for the treatment of refractory anastomotic biliary strictures. Methods: Three post-orthotopic liver transplant patients who failed standard treatment of their biliary anastomotic strictures underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balloon dilation followed by cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection at a tertiary care center. Patients had follow-up with images and laboratorial tests to evaluate for residual stricture. Results: Technical success of balloon dilation + cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection was achieved in all patients. Cholangioscopy permitted accurate evaluation of bile ducts and precise localization for steroid injection. No adverse events occurred. Mean follow-up was 26 months. Two patients are stent free and remain well in follow-up, with no signs of biliary obstruction. No further therapeutic endoscopic procedures or revisional surgery were required. One patient did not respond to balloon dilation + cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection after 11 months of follow-up and required repeat balloon dilation of new strictures above the anastomosis. Conclusion: Cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection combined with balloon dilation in the treatment of refractory post liver transplant strictures is feasible and safe. This method may be used as a rescue alternative before surgical approach. Randomized controlled trials comparing balloon dilation + cholangioscopy-guided steroid injection to fully covered self-expandable metallic stents are needed to determine the role of this treatment for anastomotic biliary strictures.

scholarly journals Effect of Covered Metallic Stents Compared With Plastic Stents on Benign Biliary Stricture Resolution

JAMA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 315 (12) ◽  
pp. 1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Coté ◽  
Adam Slivka ◽  
Paul Tarnasky ◽  
Daniel K. Mullady ◽  
B. Joseph Elmunzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Stricture ◽  
Metallic Stents ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Benign Biliary Stricture ◽  
Covered Metallic Stents

ID: 3519933 LUMEN-APPOSING METAL STENTS VERSUS DOUBLE-PIGTAIL PLASTIC STENTS IN THE ENDOSCOPIC STEP-UP APPROACH FOR INFECTED NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB244
Author(s):  
Lotte Boxhoorn ◽  
Robert C. Verdonk ◽  
Marc G. Besselink ◽  
Marja A. Boermeester ◽  
Thomas Bollen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents

scholarly journals ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF POST-LIVER TRANSPLANTATION ANASTOMOTIC BILIARY STRICTURE: systematic review andmeta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Souto NACIF ◽  
Wanderley Marques BERNARDO ◽  
Luca BERNARDO ◽  
Wellington ANDRAUS ◽  
Lucas TORRES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Endoscopic Treatment ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Biliary Strictures

Context Biliary strictures after liver transplantation are recognized as its Achilles’ heel. The strictures are classified in anastomotic and ischemic or non-anastomotic biliary strictures, and they figure among the most common complications after liver transplantation. There are some treatment options including balloon dilation, the placement of multiple plastic stents and the placement of self-expandable metal stents and all of them seem to have good results. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature concerning the results of the endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed on the management of anastomotic biliary strictures post- orthotopic liver transplantation. The Medline-PubMed, EMBASE, Scielo-LILACS, and Cochrane Databases were electronically searched from January 1966 to April 2013. Results No well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective comparisons in design. One study (86 patients) compared the endoscopic and the percutaneous accesses. The sustained clinical success rates were similar but the treatment duration was longer in the percutaneous group access. Two studies (56 patients) compared balloon dilation with balloon dilation and multiple plastic stents. There were no differences concerning sustained clinical success and complication rates. Conclusions Balloon dilation is as effective as balloon dilation plus multiple plastic stenting for the resolution of the anastomotic biliary strictures. Well-designed randomized trials are still needed to compare balloon dilation versus multiple plastic stenting versus metallic stenting.

scholarly journals Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (12) ◽  
pp. E1398-E1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri ◽  
Natsuyo Yamamoto ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
Tomotaka Saito ◽  
Kei Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Endoscopic Drainage ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Pancreatic Fluid Collection ◽  
Pancreatic Fluid ◽  
Covered Metallic Stent

Abstract Background and study aims While endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is recommended to be performed ≥ 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis (AP), early (< 4 weeks) interventions are needed in some symptomatic cases. Despite feasibility of early percutaneous drainage, there have been few studies about early EUS-guided drainage of PFC. Patients and methods Consecutive patients who received EUS-guided drainage (EUS-PCD) of infected or symptomatic PFC at the University of Tokyo were retrospectively studied. Contraindications for EUS-PCD are lack of encapsulation or adhesion to the gastrointestinal tract. Safety and effectiveness of early vs delayed (≥ 4 weeks) EUS-PCD were compared. Results A total of 35 patients underwent EUS-PCD (12 early and 23 delayed) using 19 large-bore fully-covered metallic stent and 16 plastic stents. The median diameter of PFC was 110 mm (40 – 180) and 122 mm (17 – 250) in the early and delayed drainage groups, respectively. Median time from onset of AP to drainage was 23 and 85 days for early and delayed drainage, respectively. The technical success rate of EUS-guided drainage was 100 %. Endoscopic necrosectomy was performed in six early and 16 cases of delayed drainage. The adverse event rate was 25 % (3 bleeding) and 13 % (2 perforations and 1 CO2 retention) in the early and delayed drainage groups, respectively. Two patients died (1 early and 1 delayed) due to multiorgan failure. Conclusion Endoscopic drainage and subsequent necrosectomy of symptomatic PFC within 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis was feasible, given that the collection was encapsulated and attached to the gastrointestinal tract.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document