scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents in chronic pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Yeon Suk Kim ◽  
Eui Joo Kim ◽  
Hee Seung Lee ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Spontaneous Migration

AbstractChronic pancreatitis (CP) related main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture has been a challenge for endoscopists. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) has been tried in CP patients, but the efficacy and safety are still controversial. Thus, we aim to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of FC-SEMS vs. plastic stent placement in persistent MPD strictures secondary to CP. Between 2007 and 2018, 80 chronic pancreatitis patients (58 males, median age 49 years), who underwent endoscopic placement of FC-SEMS (n = 26) and plastic stent (n = 54) for persistent MPD strictures after at least 3 months of initial single plastic stenting, were retrospectively analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 33.7 months. As a result, MPD stricture resolution rate was statistically higher in FC-SEMS group (87.0% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001). Although immediate complications occurred similarly (38.5% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.902), spontaneous migration (26.9%) and de novo strictures (23.1%) were pronounced delayed complications in FC-SEMS group. Pain relief during follow-up was significantly higher in FC-SEMS group (76.9% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.046). The total procedure cost was similar in both groups ($1,455.6 vs. $1,596.9, p = 0.486). In comparison with plastic stent, FC-SEMS placement for persistent MPD strictures had favorable long-term clinical efficacy, with its typical complications like spontaneous migration and de novo strictures.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents Versus Plastic Stents in Chronic Pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Yeon Suk Kim ◽  
Eui Joo Kim ◽  
Hee Seung Lee ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Spontaneous Migration

Abstract Chronic pancreatitis (CP) related main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture has been a challenge for endoscopists. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) has been tried in CP patients, but the efficacy and safety are still controversial. Thus, we aim to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of FC-SEMS vs. plastic stent placement in persistent MPD strictures secondary to CP. Between 2007 and 2018, 80 chronic pancreatitis patients (58 males, median age 49 years), who underwent endoscopic placement of FC-SEMS (n=26) and plastic stent (n=54) for persistent MPD strictures, were retrospectively analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 33.7 months. As a result, MPD stricture resolution rate was statistically higher in FC-SEMS group (87.0% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001). Although immediate complications occurred similarly (38.5% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.902), spontaneous migration (26.9%) and de novo strictures (23.1%) were pronounced delayed complications in FC-SEMS group. Pain relief during follow-up was significantly higher in FC-SEMS group (76.9% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.046). The total procedure cost was similar in both groups ($1,455.6 vs. $1,596.9, p = 0.486). In comparison with plastic stent, FC-SEMS placement for persistent MPD strictures had favorable long-term clinical efficacy, with its typical complications like spontaneous migration and de novo strictures.

Early removal of biflanged metal stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a prospective study

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Dhir ◽  
Douglas Adler ◽  
Ankit Dalal ◽  
Nitin Aherrao ◽  
Rahul Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Early Removal ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Dedicated stents placed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance have shown promise for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). A long duration of stent placement may increase the risk of adverse events. We prospectively evaluated the effects of (i) early removal of biflanged metal stents (BFMSs) and (ii) additional stenting of the pancreatic duct with plastic stents in patients with ductal leaks, on the risk of WON recurrence. Patients and methods Symptomatic patients with pancreatic WON underwent EUS-guided BFMS placement, followed by necrosectomy, when required, from Day 3. A 5 Fr plastic stent was placed in patients with ductal leak. BFMS was removed when the WON cavity had collapsed completely. Patients were followed up at 3-month intervals. Results BFMS placement was successful in all 88 patients. A total of 64 patients (72.7 %) underwent necrosectomy (median 3 sessions). All BFMSs were removed at a median of 3.5 weeks (range 3 – 17 weeks). Ductal disconnection and leak occurred in 53/87 (60.9 %) and 61/87 (70.1 %) patients, respectively. A 5 Fr stent was placed in 56/61 patients (91.8 %) with ductal leak. Overall, 22 patients (25.0 %) had adverse events (17 mild, 1 moderate, 3 severe, 1 fatal). Recurrence was noted in 8/88 (9.1 %) at a median follow-up of 22 months. The recurrence rate was higher in patients with ductal disconnection than in those without (13.2 % vs. 2.9 %; P = 0.08), and was similar in patients with vs. without pancreatic duct stenting (7.1 % vs. 12.9 %; P = 0.44). Seven recurrences (87.5 %) partially regressed on follow-up and did not require therapy; in one case, drainage with a plastic stent was performed. Conclusions Short-term BFMS placement is an effective therapy for pancreatic WON. The majority of recurrences developed in patients with ductal disconnection and did not require therapy. Additional pancreatic duct stents probably do not influence the recurrence rate.

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents to dilate persistent pancreatic strictures in chronic pancreatitis: long-term follow-up from a prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 939-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tringali ◽  
Salvatore Francesco Vadalà di Prampero ◽  
Rosario Landi ◽  
Vincenzo Bove ◽  
Pietro Familiari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
A Prospective Study

scholarly journals Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for refractory pancreatic duct strictures in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, US experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. E1419-E1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem Z. Sharaiha ◽  
Aleksey Novikov ◽  
Kristen Weaver ◽  
Pawan Marfatia ◽  
Jonathan M. Buscaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Self Expanding Metal Stents

Abstract Background and study aims Fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) have been used to treat refractory pancreatic duct strictures. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of FCSEMS in chronic pancreatitis with refractory pancreatic duct strictures. Patients and methods This was a retrospective multicenter cases series of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with FCSEMS placement in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) at five tertiary care centers between February 2010 and June 2016. Primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success, and procedure-related morbidity. Secondary endpoints were pain relief at the end of follow-up and resolution of the pancreatic stricture on ERCP. Results Thirty-three patients with previously drained stents, 76 % of whom were male, underwent ERCP with FCSEMS placement. Mean duration of follow-up was 14 months. All of the patients had prior therapy. The technical success rate for FCSEMS placement was 100 % (n = 33) and the clinical success rate was 93 % (was n = 31). Stents were removed after a median duration of 14.4 weeks. After stent removal, the diameter of the narrowest MPD stricture had increased significantly from 1 mm to 4.5 mm (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant improvement on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from a median of 8.5 to 2.5. At the end of the study, (n = 27) 87.1 % of patients reported significant pain reduction with reduced narcotic use. Conclusion FCSEMS appeared to be a feasible, safe, and potentially effective Intervention in patients who had not responded to endoscopic therapy with plastic stents.

Long-term follow-up after multiple plastic stenting for refractory pancreatic duct strictures in chronic pancreatitis

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 930-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tringali ◽  
Vincenzo Bove ◽  
Salvatore F. Vadalà di Prampero ◽  
Ivo Boškoski ◽  
Pietro Familiari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilation ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Pancreatic Stent ◽  
Stent Removal ◽  
Stricture Recurrence

Abstract Background Dominant pancreatic duct strictures in chronic pancreatitis are often managed by endoscopic placement of a single plastic stent. Insertion of multiple plastic stents (MPS) has been proven to be effective in managing refractory strictures, but data are still limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and long-term results of MPS to dilate pancreatic duct strictures in chronic pancreatitis. Methods 48 patients (34 men; mean age 44 years) with chronic pancreatitis and a single pancreatic stent through a refractory stricture in the pancreatic head underwent the following protocol: 1) removal of the single pancreatic stent; 2) balloon dilation of the stricture; 3) insertion of the maximum number of stents; 4) stent removal after 6 – 12 months. Results The median number of pancreatic plastic stents placed was 3 (diameter 7 – 11.5 Fr, length 3 – 7 cm). Five patients (10.4 %) had persistent strictures after MPS removal. During a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (0.3 – 15.5 years) after stent removal, 74.4 % (32/43) of the patients were asymptomatic, and 25.6 % (11/43) experienced pancreatitis recurrence or pancreatic type pain after a mean time of 26.4 months (8/43, 18.6 % underwent plug extraction without evidence of stricture recurrence; 3/43, 7.0 % had stricture recurrence). No major complications were recorded. Conclusion Endoscopic multiple plastic stenting of chronic pancreatitis-related pancreatic duct strictures showed satisfactory long-term results, with the option of re-treatment. This procedure can be considered an important therapeutic alternative for painful pancreatic duct strictures located in the head of the pancreas in the setting of chronic pancreatitis.

Common Bile Duct Strictures Due to Chronic Pancreatitis Managed by Self-Expandable-Metal Stents (SEMS): Results of a Long-Term Follow-Up Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. AB220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tringali ◽  
Francesco Di Matteo ◽  
Federico Iacopini ◽  
Pietro Familiari ◽  
Massimiliano Mutignani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Is 3 years adequate for tracking completely occluded coiled aneurysms?

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 758-764
Author(s):  
Eung Koo Yeon ◽  
Young Dae Cho ◽  
Dong Hyun Yoo ◽  
Su Hwan Lee ◽  
Hyun-Seung Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Careful Monitoring ◽  
Surveillance Period ◽  
Radiological Data ◽  
De Novo Aneurysm ◽  
Low Probability ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Annual Risk

OBJECTIVEThe authors conducted a study to ascertain the long-term durability of coiled aneurysms completely occluded at 36 months’ follow-up given the potential for delayed recanalization.METHODSIn this retrospective review, the authors examined 299 patients with 339 aneurysms, all shown to be completely occluded at 36 months on follow-up images obtained between 2011 and 2013. Medical records and radiological data acquired during the extended monitoring period (mean 74.3 ± 22.5 months) were retrieved, and the authors analyzed the incidence of (including mean annual risk) and risk factors for delayed recanalization.RESULTSA total of 5 coiled aneurysms (1.5%) occluded completely at 36 months showed recanalization (0.46% per aneurysm-year) during the long-term surveillance period (1081.9 aneurysm-years), 2 surfacing within 60 months and 3 developing thereafter. Four showed minor recanalization, with only one instance of major recanalization. The latter involved the posterior communicating artery as an apparent de novo lesion, arising at the neck of a firmly coiled sac, and was unrelated to coil compaction or growth. Additional embolization was undertaken. In a multivariate analysis, a second embolization for a recurrent aneurysm (HR = 22.088, p = 0.003) independently correlated with delayed recanalization.CONCLUSIONSAlmost all coiled aneurysms (98.5%) showing complete occlusion at 36 months postembolization proved to be stable during extended observation. However, recurrent aneurysms were predisposed to delayed recanalization. Given the low probability yet seriousness of delayed recanalization and the possibility of de novo aneurysm formation, careful monitoring may be still considered in this setting but at less frequent intervals beyond 36 months.

Long‐Term Follow‐Up of a Patient with a De Novo p. Arg769Cys Mutation in the ATP1A3 Gene

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Chouksey ◽  
Asish Vijayaraghavan ◽  
Sony Mohan ◽  
Srija Inturi ◽  
A.T. Prabhakar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Atp1a3 Gene

scholarly journals Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis after biliary stenting with self-expandable metal stents vs. plastic stents in benign and malignant obstructions

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
pp. E888-E894
Author(s):  
Nichol S. Martinez ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Sheila N. Firoozan ◽  
Stephanie Izard ◽  
Calvin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Stent Type ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stent

Abstract Background and study aims There are conflicting data regarding the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) compared to polyethylene stents (PS) in malignant biliary obstructions and limited data related to benign obstructions. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of 1136 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction and received SEMS or PS at a tertiary-care medical center between January 2011 and October 2016. We evaluated the association between stent type (SEMS vs PS) and PEP in malignant and benign biliary obstructions. Results Among the 1136 patients included in our study, 399 had SEMS placed and 737 had PS placed. Patients with PS were more likely to have pancreatic duct cannulation, pancreatic duct stent placement, double guidewire technique, sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty as compared to the SEMS group. On multivariate analysis, PEP rates were higher in the SEMS group (8.0 %) versus the PS group (4.8 %) (OR 2.27 [CI, 1.22, 4.24]) for all obstructions. For malignant obstructions, PEP rates were 7.8 % and 6.6 % for SEMS and plastic stents, respectively (OR 1.54 [CI, 0.72, 3.30]). For benign obstructions the PEP rate was higher in the SEMS group (8.8 %) compared to the PS group (4.2 %) (OR 3.67 [CI, 1.50, 8.97]). No significant differences between PEP severity were identified based on stent type when stratified based on benign and malignant. Conclusions PEP rates were higher when SEMS were used for benign obstruction as compared to PS. For malignant obstruction, no difference was identified in PEP rates with use of SEMS vs PS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document