32 Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP)in breast reconstructionDeep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP)in breast reconstructionBreast reconstructionfree perforator flaps inBreast reconstructiondeep inferior epigastric perforator flap inBreast reconstructiondeep inferior epigastric perforator flap inBreast Reconstruction with Free Perforator Flaps

2022 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. e122-e124
Author(s):  
M Khatib ◽  
KY Wong ◽  
A Elfaki ◽  
RM Haywood ◽  
D Masud

A 42-year-old woman was referred for consideration of left-sided mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. She previously had a bilateral breast augmentation using silicone implants. She desired to maintain her breast size and natural appearance. Owing to the availability of sufficient abdominal tissue, the option of an immediate unilateral breast reconstruction and contralateral augmentation with a differentially split deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps was offered to the patient. The patient had a successful reconstructive and contralateral symmetrising procedure with an uneventful postoperative recovery. She was satisfied with her breast size, which was achieved without the use of implants. In selected patients the free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap provides an appropriate option for unilateral breast reconstruction and contralateral breast augmentation. It has numerous advantages including making use of available excess abdominal tissue and avoiding implant related complications.


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Vandevoort ◽  
Pieter Vermeulen ◽  
Gerd Fabre ◽  
Jan Vranckx

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110247
Author(s):  
Pavlo O. Badiul ◽  
Sergii V. Sliesarenko ◽  
Nataliia O. Cherednychenko ◽  
Olga V. Morgun

Background: Reconstruction with the use of perforator flaps makes it possible to make the skin surface resistant to the influence of mechanical factors and as similar to the lost skin cover as possible. However, while planning any flap, along with the design of the required shape and size, its blood supply should be taken into account to ensure optimal viability. Therefore, the task to precisely determine the topographic–anatomical relationships suitable for the formation of a pedicle of perforators is still relevant. The aim of this study was to increase the efficiency of surgical reconstruction of wound defects by transposition of locoregional perforator flaps. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 cases of reconstruction by means of locoregional perforator flaps with vascular pedicle detachment to determine the efficiency of preoperative diagnostic preparation with the help of multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography (MDCT) in the process of reconstruction. Thirty-seven individual cases of surgical interventions were chosen using a case-controlled study from the study group when MDCT with angiography was used for preoperative planning of perforator flaps, as well as 35 control cases similar in terms of important predictive peculiarities with the reconstruction at the same level of difficulty. The patient groups were precisely matched by gender ( P = .950), age ( P = .804), flap area ( P = .192), and type of reconstruction that was performed. Results: In all cases, the location of the perforator with a diameter greater than 1.0 mm was marked. All perforators determined during MDCT scanning were faultlessly localized intraoperatively. The distance between the intraoperative position of the perforator and the position obtained in the result of the examination did not exceed 1 cm. There was no need to change the planned design of the flap intraoperatively. In all cases where MDCT was performed, the duration of the surgical procedure varied from 60 to 150 minutes (average: 120.77 [18.90] minutes) and was reduced by 49.40 minutes (95% CI: 39.17-59.63) compared with the patients who did not undergo preoperative visualization of perforators where the average duration of the operation was 170.17 (19.19) minutes (from 140 to 220 minutes). Among the patients examined by MDCT, surgical complications were noted in 5 cases (13.51%) compared to 14 cases (40.00%) in the control group. Conclusions: The preoperative MDCT for the locoregional perforator flap reconstruction makes it possible to increase the efficiency of patient treatment given the reduction in surgery duration by 49.40 minutes (95% CI: 39.17-59.63) on average and the reduction in the level of postsurgery complications from 40% to 13.5% compared with the group of patients in whom presurgical visualization was not performed ( P = .031).


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. e188-e191
Author(s):  
Chin-Wen Tu ◽  
Chien-Liang Fang ◽  
Chong-Bin Tsai ◽  
Chin-Hao Hsu ◽  
Chih-Hsuan Changchien ◽  
...  

Microsurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong-Tae Lee ◽  
Jeong-Eon Lee ◽  
Seok-Jin Nam ◽  
Boo-Kyung Han ◽  
Goo-Hyun Mun

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. e237618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie Alyce Joya ◽  
Cara Deegan ◽  
Todd D Gleeson

A 40-year-old woman was referred to infectious disease specialists for a Mycobacterium mageritense skin infection following mastectomy and bilateral reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Her case demonstrates the difficulty in treating non-tuberculosis mycobacterial infections, especially the rarely seen species. She failed to respond to dual antibiotic therapy containing imipenem-cilastin despite reported sensitivity. Additionally, her course was complicated by intolerance to various regimens, including gastrointestinal distress, a drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and tendinopathy. With few published data, no treatment guidelines, and limited medications from which to choose for M. mageritense, her treatment posed a challenge. She ultimately required aggressive surgical intervention and a triple therapy antibiotic regimen. The duration of our patient’s treatment and the extent of her complications suggest a potential need for early surgical intervention in postsurgical wounds infected with M. mageritense that do not respond to conventional treatment.


2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E Craigie ◽  
Robert J Allen ◽  
Frank J DellaCroce ◽  
Scott K Sullivan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document