Eugen Bleuler: Dementia Praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (08) ◽  
pp. 412-413
Author(s):  
Edward Shorter ◽  
Max Fink

Eugen Bleuler, professor of psychiatry in Zurich, renamed Kraepelin’s dementia praecox as “schizophrenia” in 1908. He retained catatonia as a subtype. Bleuler’s dementia praecox was a much milder and broader condition than the downhill course toward dementia that Kraepelin had described: it could strike at any moment in life, not just in youth, and often ended in partial recovery. Ultimately, Kraepelin’s and Bleuler’s efforts gave rise to an immense “schizophrenia” literature, an industry that continues today, an outpouring that can be compared only to the enormous “hysteria” industry that existed before DSM-III abolished the diagnosis in 1980. The effect is striking: one moment the profession believes implicitly in a disease so huge as to dominate the literature; the next moment the disease no longer exists.


1975 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Raskin

Eugen Bleuler has had a major influence on American psychiatry. His theory of schizophrenia, linking descriptive psychiatry to Freud's psychoanalytic concepts, has had an important influence on diagnosis and treatment, especially in America. This paper will summarize first some textbook descriptions of Bleuler's contribution and then some major issues which Bleuler discusses in his book Dementia Praecox, or the Group of Schizophrenias. I hope to demonstrate that the textbook accounts do not adequately describe the complexity and ambiguity of Bleuler's approach.


1986 ◽  
Vol 149 (5) ◽  
pp. 661-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Bleuler ◽  
Rudolf Bleuler

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  

The introduction of the term and concept schizophrenia earned its inventor, Swiss psychiatrist Eugen Bleuler, worldwide fame. Prompted by the rejection of the main principle of Kraepelinian nosology, namely prognosis, Bleuler's belief in the clinical unity of what Kraepelin had described as dementia praecox required him to search for alternative characterizing features that would allow scientific description and classification. This led him to consider psychological, and to a lesser degree, social factors alongside an assumed underlying neurobiological disease process as constitutive of what he then termed schizophrenia, thus making him an early proponent of a bio-psycho-social understanding of mental illness. Reviewing Bleuler's conception of schizophrenia against the background of his overall clinical and theoretical work, this paper provides a critical overview of Bleuler's key nosological principles and links his work with present-day debates about naturalism, essentialism, and stigma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document