Entwicklung eines „Health Screening Questionnaire“ zur betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Basrai ◽  
J Wittig ◽  
SC Bischoff
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
P. Sharma ◽  
G. Devkota

 Introduction: Screening of mental disorders and psychological distress is important in clinical as well as research setting. The objective of this study is to test the reliability of mental health screening questionnaire developed by authors and see its correlation with perceived stress scale scores. Material and Method: A self-report screening instrument was designed by the authors in consultation with experts and was tested for reliability among 162 participants from general population gathered for stress management program. The correlation of the designed scale was tested with the Perceived Stress Scale score. Results: Scale reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) for the designed psychological distress scale was found to be 0.7558 which is regarded as having acceptable internal consistency. The questions of the designed scale had weak to moderate positive correlation with the score on Perceived Stress Scale. Conclusion: Despite many shortcomings of the designed scale we may be able to use it for basic screening of psychological distress and mental health problems. We recommend the validity of scale be tested in larger sample size.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Keay ◽  
Gavin Francis ◽  
Karen Hind

BACKGROUND Risk factors for poor bone health are not restricted to older, sedentary populations for whom current screening is focused. Furthermore, access to dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning can be limited in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the current study was to develop a bone health-screening tool suitable for inclusion of both younger and active populations, combined with radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry technology (REMS). METHODS 88 participants attending a physiotherapy clinic in the UK were recruited to the study: 71 women (mean age 41.5 SD 14.0 years); 17 men (mean age 40.2 SD 14.9 years). Participants completed an online bone health-screening questionnaire developed specifically for this study covering a range of lifestyle, physiological factors, combined with medical interview and received bone mineral density (BMD) measurement at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using REMS. RESULTS Scoring of the bone health-screening questionnaire produced a distribution of bone health scores, with lower scores suggesting a higher risk for poor bone health. In women, scores ranged from -10 to +12, mean score 2.2 (SD 4.8). In men, scores ranged from 0 to 12, mean score 6.9 (SD 3.2). A positive correlation was observed between the bone health score derived from the questionnaire and lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD Z-scores (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS This new and comprehensive bone health-screening questionnaire with interview was effective in identifying active individuals at risk of bone fragility, who might be missed by current screening methods. The use of REMS technology to measure bone health, was feasible in the clinical setting. CLINICALTRIAL NA


Author(s):  
Jonathan David Comins ◽  
Kirsten Schierup Freund ◽  
Karl Bang Christensen ◽  
Jørgen Lous ◽  
John Brodersen

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L. Noga ◽  
Elizabeth C. L. Walsh ◽  
Jenny J. Shaw ◽  
Jane Senior

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn E. Kingston ◽  
Marie-Paule Austin ◽  
Maureen Heaman ◽  
Sheila McDonald ◽  
Gerri Lasiuk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document