Therapeutic Pneumoperitoneum: Relevant or Obsolete in 2015?

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (05) ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Berger ◽  
Joe Small ◽  
Rafael Garza ◽  
Rafael Andrade ◽  
Eitan Podgaetz
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Function Tests ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Pleural Space ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Intraperitoneal Pressure ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Background Therapeutic pneumoperitoneum (TP) is one alternative to manage pleural space problems. We describe our technique and experience. Materials and Methods Medical records of all patients who underwent TP from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2015, were reviewed after Institutional Review Board approval. We report indication, preprocedure pulmonary function tests, volume of insufflated air, time to chest tube removal, and complications. We place a red rubber catheter into the peritoneal space through the diaphragm or a small abdominal incision, insufflate with room air, record volume (liters), intraperitoneal pressure (goal 9–10 mm Hg), and monitor vital signs, airway pressures, and urine output. Results We performed TP in 32 patients. Follow-up was available for 31 patients. Indications were prevention of pleural space problems in bilobectomy patients (n = 11), following decortication for empyema (n = 11), prevention of prolonged air leak (n = 3), prevention of postresection space (n = 4), and spontaneous chylothorax (n = 2). TP was done postoperatively in three patients. Median air volume used was 3.5 L (3–6 L). Time to chest tube removal overall was 7.8 days (3–20 days) and to discharge 10.2 days (4–32 days). No patient developed respiratory failure, renal failure, or required evacuation of TP. Conclusion TP is a simple, safe, and effective technique to manage pleural space problems. Proper patient selection and meticulous technique are imperative for the successful clinical application of TP. We believe that TP is an underutilized tool for the management of pleural space problems and merits wider application in thoracic surgical practice.

Autologous Blood Pleurodesis: What Is the Optimal Time Interval and Amount of Blood?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Campisi ◽  
Andrea Dell'Amore ◽  
Yonghui Zhang ◽  
Zhitao Gu ◽  
Angelo Paolo Ciarrocchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Blood Patch ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Abstract Background Air leak is the most common complication after lung resection and leads to increased length of hospital (LOH) stay or patient discharge with a chest tube. Management by autologous blood patch pleurodesis (ABPP) is controversial because few studies exist, and the technique has yet to be standardized. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing ABPP for prolonged air leak (PAL) following lobectomy in three centers, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were divided into two groups: Group A, 120 mL of blood infused; Group B, 60 mL. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed, and 23 patients were included in each group. Numbers and success rates of blood patch, time to cessation of air leak, time to chest tube removal, reoperation, LOH, and complications were examined. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables associated with an increased risk of air leak was performed. Results After the PSM, 120 mL of blood is statistically significant in reducing the number of days before chest tube removal after ABPP (2.78 vs. 4.35), LOH after ABPP (3.78 vs. 10.00), and LOH (8.78 vs. 15.17). Complications (0 vs. 4) and hours until air leak cessation (6.83 vs. 3.91, range 1–13) after ABPP were also statistically different (p < 0.05). Air leaks that persisted for up to 13 hours required another ABPP. No patient had re-operation or long-term complications related to pleurodesis. Conclusion In our experience, 120 mL is the optimal amount of blood and the procedure can be repeated every 24 hours with the chest tube clamped.

scholarly journals Safety of early discharge with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-618
Author(s):  
Feichao Bao ◽  
Natasha Toleska Dimitrovska ◽  
Shoujun Hu ◽  
Xiao Chu ◽  
Wentao Li
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Hospital Days

Abstract OBJECTIVES Early removal of chest tube is an important step in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. However, after pulmonary resection with a wide dissection plane, such as pulmonary segmentectomy, prolonged air leak, a large volume of pleural drainage and the risk of developing empyema in patients can delay chest tube removal and result in a low rate of completion of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of discharging patients with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon’s experience of pulmonary segmentectomy from May 2019 to September 2019. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for discharging with a chest tube were discharged and provided written instructions. They returned for chest tube removal after satisfactory resolution of air leak or fluid drainage. RESULTS In total, 126 patients underwent pulmonary segmentectomy. Ninety-five (75%) patients were discharged with a chest tube postoperatively. The mean time to chest tube removal after discharge was 5.6 (range 2–32) days, potentially saving 532 inpatient hospital days. Overall, 90 (95%) patients experienced uneventful and successful outpatient chest tube management. No life-threatening complications were observed. No patient experienced complications resulting from chest tube malfunction. Five (5%) patients experienced minor complications. Overall, all patients reported good-to-excellent mobility with a chest tube. CONCLUSIONS Successful postoperative outpatient chest tube management after pulmonary segmentectomy can be accomplished in selected patients without a major increase in morbidity or mortality.

scholarly journals What Keeps Postpulmonary Resection Patients in Hospital?

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Bardell ◽  
D Petsikas
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak (longer than three days) was hypothesized to be the primary cause of extended hospital stays following pulmonary resection. Its effect on length of stay (LOS) was compared with that of suboptimal pain control, nausea and vomiting, and other causes. Predictors of prolonged LOS and of prolonged air leaks were investigated.DESIGN: Retrospective review of 91 patients. Primary reasons for prolonged hospitalization were determined. Patient characteristics (demographic information, pulmonary function test results, body habitus measurements, smoking history), operative factors (procedure performed, duration of operation, complications) and postoperative factors (time of chest tube removal) were considered. Student'sttest andX2analysis were used to compare continuous and ratio data, respectively, and linear regression analysis was used to define the equation relating two variables.RESULTS: The mean postoperative LOS was 6.4 days. Only prolonged air leak was predictive of increased LOS (9.4 days versus 5.4 days, P<0.001). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s less than 1.5 L/min, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity less than 80% predicted and the detection of a pneumothorax were all predictive of prolonged air leak. A strong correlation between the time of chest tube removal and LOS was found (r=0.937, P<0.001). Linear regression analysis showed postoperative LOS and duration of thoracostomy tube insertion to be related by the equation y = 0.88x + 2.49 days.CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that increased LOS following pulmonary resection is due primarily to prolonged air leaks. Furthermore, patients who have their chest tubes removed sooner are discharged sooner.

scholarly journals Multicenter randomized study on comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Marulli ◽  
Giovanni Maria Comacchio ◽  
Mario Nosotti ◽  
Lorenzo Rosso ◽  
Paolo Mendogni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pleural Space ◽  
Chest Drain ◽  
Chest Drainage ◽  
Drainage Systems ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Space Effect ◽  
Digital Chest ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Abstract Background: In patients submitted to major pulmonary resection, post-operative length of stay is mainly influenced by duration of air leaks and chest tube removal. The measurement of air leaks largely relies on traditional chest drainage systems which are prone to subjective interpretation. Difficulty in differentiating between active air leaks and bubbles due to a pleural space effect may also lead to tentative drain clamping and prolonged time for chest drain removal. New digital systems allow continuous monitoring of air leaks, identifying subtle leakage that may be not visible during daily patient evaluation. Moreover, an objective assessment of air leaks may lead to a reduced interobserver variability and to an optimized timing of chest tube removal. Methods: This study is a prospective randomized, interventional, multicenter trial designed to compare the electronic chest drainage system (Drentech™ Palm Evo) with the traditional one (Drentech™ Compact) in a cohort of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy through a standard 3-ports VATS approach both for benign or malignant disease. It will enroll 382 patients in 3 Italian centers. Duration of chest drainage and length of hospital stay will be evaluated in the two groups. Moreover, it will be evaluated if the use of a digital chest system compared with a traditional system reduces theinterobserver variability. Finally, it will be evaluated if the digital drain system may help in distinguishing an active air leak from a pleural space effect, by the digital assessment of intrapleural differential pressure, and in identifying potential predictors of prolonged air leaks. Discussion : To date, few studies have been performed to evaluate clinical impact of digital drainage systems. The proposed prospective randomized trial will provide new knowledge to this research area by investigating and comparing the difference between digital and traditional chest drain systems. In particular, the objectives of this project are to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of digital chest drainages and to provide new tools to identify patients at higher risk of developing prolonged air leaks.

scholarly journals Intrabronchial Valve Treatment for Prolonged Air Leak: Can We Justify the Cost?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Podgaetz ◽  
Felix Zamora ◽  
Heidi Gibson ◽  
Rafael S. Andrade ◽  
Eric Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Levels Of Care ◽  
Air Leaks ◽  
Limited Experience ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
The Cost

Background.Prolonged air leak is defined as an ongoing air leak for more than 5 days. Intrabronchial valve (IBV) treatment is approved for the treatment of air leaks.Objective.To analyze our experience with IBV and valuate its cost-effectiveness.Methods.Retrospective analysis of IBV from June 2013 to October 2014. We analyzed direct costs based on hospital and operating room charges. We used average costs in US dollars for the analysis not individual patient data.Results.We treated 13 patients (9 M/4 F), median age of 60 years (38 to 90). Median time from diagnosis to IBV placement was 9.8 days, time from IBV placement to chest tube removal was 3 days, and time from IBV placement to hospital discharge was 4 days. Average room and board costs were $14,605 including all levels of care. IBV cost is $2750 per valve. The average number of valves used was 4. Total cost of procedure, valves, and hospital stay until discharge was $13,900.Conclusion.In our limited experience, the use of IBV to treat prolonged air leaks is safe and appears cost-effective. In pure financial terms, the cost seems justified for any air leak predicted to last greater than 8 days.

“Chest Tube” Removal after Liver Transgression

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Hegarty ◽  
Jan F. Gerstenmaier ◽  
David Brophy
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Technique for chest tube removal

ASVIDE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 226-226
Author(s):  
Kyung Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Chest tube removal after cardiac surgery

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
SC Thomson ◽  
S Wells ◽  
M Maxwell
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Chest Tubes ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Prompt remove of chest tubes by RNs has allowed earlier and more aggressive ambulation of our patients and, along with other interventions, has decreased length of stay by 1.5 days while improving quality of care. Proper education, both didactic and clinical, is the key component in preparing RNs to safely and effectively perform this procedure.

Clinical descriptors of pneumothorax following chest tube removal in paediatric cardiac surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Christine LaGrasta ◽  
Mary McLellan ◽  
Jean Connor
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Chest Radiograph ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Paediatric Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background: There is limited data describing the characteristics of paediatric post-operative cardiac surgery patients who develop pneumothoraces after chest tube removal. Patient management after chest tube removal is not standardised across paediatric cardiac surgery programmes. The purposes of this study were to describe the frequency of pneumothorax after chest tube removal in paediatric post-operative cardiac surgical patients and to describe the patient and clinical characteristics of those patients who developed a clinically significant pneumothorax requiring intervention. Methods: A single-institution retrospective descriptive study (1 January, 2010–31 December, 2018) was utilised to review 11,651 paediatric post-operative cardiac surgical patients from newborn to 18 years old. Results: Twenty-five patients were diagnosed with a pneumothorax by chest radiograph following chest tube removal (0.2%). Of these 25 patients, 15 (1.6%) had a clinically significant pneumothorax and 8 (53%) did not demonstrate a change in baseline clinical status or require an increase in supplemental oxygen, 14 (93%) required an intervention, 9 (60%) were <1 year of age, 4 (27%) had single-ventricle physiology, and 5 (33%) had other non-cardiac anomalies/genetic syndromes. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients, we confirmed the incidence of pneumothorax after chest tube removal is low in paediatric post-operative cardiac surgery patients. This population does not always exhibit changes in clinical status despite having clinically significant pneumothoraces. We suggest the development of criteria, based on clinical characteristics, for patients who are at increased risk of developing a pneumothorax and would require a routine chest radiograph following chest tube removal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document