scholarly journals Up to 5-Year Follow-up after Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Castro ◽  
S. Pecha ◽  
S. Amin ◽  
M. Linder ◽  
N. Gosau ◽  
...  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1904-1908
Author(s):  
Erika Hutt ◽  
Mohamed Diab ◽  
Oussama M. Wazni ◽  
Simrat Kaur ◽  
Khaldoun G. Tarakji ◽  
...  

EP Europace ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i103-i103
Author(s):  
Simon Claridge ◽  
Jonathan Johnson ◽  
Christopher Rajkumar ◽  
Tom Jackson ◽  
Jonathan Behar ◽  
...  

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1097-1102
Author(s):  
Anders Fyhn Elgaard ◽  
Jens Brock Johansen ◽  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen ◽  
Christian Gerdes ◽  
Sam Riahi ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  Commonly, a dysfunctional defibrillator lead is abandoned and a new lead is implanted. Long-term follow-up data on abandoned leads are sparse. We aimed to investigate the incidence and reasons for extraction of abandoned defibrillator leads in a nationwide cohort and to describe extraction procedure-related complications. Methods and results  All abandoned transvenous defibrillator leads were identified in the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register from 1991 to 2019. The event-free survival of abandoned defibrillator leads was studied, and medical records of patients with interventions on abandoned defibrillator leads were audited for procedure-related data. We identified 740 abandoned defibrillator leads. Meantime from implantation to abandonment was 7.2 ± 3.8 years with mean patient age at abandonment of 66.5 ± 13.7 years. During a mean follow-up after abandonment of 4.4 ± 3.1 years, 65 (8.8%) abandoned defibrillator leads were extracted. Most frequent reason for extraction was infection (pocket and systemic) in 41 (63%) patients. Procedural outcome after lead extraction was clinical success in 63 (97%) patients. Minor complications occurred in 3 (5%) patients, and major complications in 1 (2%) patient. No patient died from complication to the procedure during 30-day follow-up after extraction. Conclusion  More than 90% of abandoned defibrillator leads do not need to be extracted during long-term follow-up. The most common indication for extraction is infection. Abandoned defibrillator leads can be extracted with high clinical success rate and low risk of major complications at high-volume centres.


EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii388-iii388
Author(s):  
S. Hakmi ◽  
S. Pecha ◽  
J. Vogler ◽  
N. Gosau ◽  
S. Willems ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2571
Author(s):  
Carlo Caiati ◽  
Giovanni Luzzi ◽  
Paolo Pollice ◽  
Stefano Favale ◽  
Mario Erminio Lepera

Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (p = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 151376
Author(s):  
Stine Camilla Blichfeldt-Ærø ◽  
Thomas M. Knutsen ◽  
Hege Merethe Hagen ◽  
Lien My Diep ◽  
Gro Trondalen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1407-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL V. ORLOV ◽  
JOHN C. MESSENGER ◽  
SERGE TOBIAS ◽  
CLYDE W. SMITH ◽  
WINFRIED WAIDER ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Łukasz Tułecki ◽  
Anna Polewczyk ◽  
Wojciech Jacheć ◽  
Dorota Nowosielecka ◽  
Konrad Tomków ◽  
...  

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a relatively safe procedure, but it may cause severe complications such as cardiac/vascular wall tear (CVWT) and tricuspid valve damage (TVD). Methods: The risk factors for CVWT and TVD were examined based on an analysis of data of 1500 extraction procedures performed in two high-volume centers. Results: The total number of major complications was 33 (2.2%) and included 22 (1.5%) CVWT and 12 (0.8%) TVD (with one case of combined complication). Patients with hemorrhagic complications were younger, more often women, less often presenting low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and those who received their first cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) earlier than the control group. A typical patient with CVWT was a pacemaker carrier, having more leads (including abandoned leads and excessive loops) with long implant duration and a history of multiple CIED-related procedures. The risk factors for TVD were similar to those for CVWT, but the patients were older and received their CIED about nine years earlier. Any form of tissue scar and technical problems were much more common in the two groups of patients with major complications. Conclusions: The risk factors for CVWT and TVD are similar, and the most important ones are related to long lead dwell time and its consequences for the heart (various forms of fibrotic scarring). The occurrence of procedural complications does not affect long-term survival in patients undergoing lead extraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document