Predictors of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Outcome: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Fanelli ◽  
Michele Mercurio ◽  
Giorgio Gasparini ◽  
Olimpio Galasso
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Patient Reported

AbstractThis systematic review investigates factors associated with outcomes after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register databases were used to search relevant articles in April 2018. Studies that evaluated at least one association between a factor and outcomes were extracted. Of 3,381 titles, 52 studies were finally analyzed. Data about predictors, patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs), and failure rates were extracted for quantitative and qualitative analysis. A total of 3,382 patients and 3,460 transplants were identified. Thirty different predictors were reported in the current MAT literature, 18 of which by at least two studies. Subgroup analysis showed that lateral MAT had higher postoperative values than medial MAT in Lysholm's (p = 0.0102) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC; p = 0.0056) scores. Soft tissue fixation showed higher postoperative IKDC scores than bone fixation (p = 0.0008). Fresh frozen allografts had higher Lysholm's scores (p < 0.0001) and showed significantly lower failure rates (p < 0.0001) than cryopreserved allografts. Age (p < 0.015, β = 0.80), sex (p < 0.034, β  =  − 8.52), and body mass index (BMI; p < 0.014, β = −4.87) demonstrated an association with PROMs in the regression model. Qualitative analysis found moderate evidence that a higher number of previous procedures in the same knee are an independent predictor of transplant failure. Conflicting evidence was found with regard to chondral damage, time from meniscectomy, smoke, sport level, worker's compensation status, and preoperative Lysholm's score as predictors of outcomes. Our review suggests that the ideal candidate to undergo MAT may be a young male of normal weight with no previous knee surgeries, treated with a lateral isolated procedure. However, MAT is associated with good outcomes in the majority of patients with many of the PROMs requiring further study to determine their direct effects on long-term outcomes. This study is a systematic review and reflects level of evidence IV.

Clinical Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With or Without Other Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 3047-3056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bum-Sik Lee ◽  
Hyun-Jung Kim ◽  
Chang-Rack Lee ◽  
Seong-Il Bin ◽  
Dae-Hee Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: While additional procedures correcting accompanying pathological conditions can improve the clinical outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), whether those outcomes are comparable or poorer than those of isolated MAT has yet to be clarified. Purpose:  To evaluate whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between isolated MAT and MAT combined with other procedures (combined MAT). Study Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Methods: For the comparison of clinical outcomes between isolated MAT and combined MAT, the authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that separately reported the clinical outcomes of isolated MAT and combined MAT were included. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication, reoperation, survivorship, and failure rates. We conducted a meta-analysis of the PROs that were used in more than 3 studies. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in this study. In the meta-analysis, no significant differences in Lysholm scores (95% CI, –5.92 to 1.55; P = .25), Tegner activity scores (95% CI, –0.54 to 0.22; P = .41), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores (95% CI, –5.67 to 3.37; P = .62), and visual analog scale scores (95% CI, –0.15 to 0.94; P = .16) were observed between isolated MAT and combined MAT. For PROs that were not included in the meta-analysis, most studies reported no significant difference between the 2 groups. As for the survivorship and failure rates, studies showed varying outcomes. Four studies reported that additional procedures did not affect MAT failure or survivorship. However, 3 studies reported that ligament surgery, realignment osteotomy, and osteochondral autograft transfer were risk factors of failure. One study reported that the medial MAT group in which high tibial osteotomy was performed showed a higher survival rate than the isolated medial MAT group. Conclusion: Overall, there seems to be no significant difference between the postoperative PROs in terms of isolated MAT and combined MAT. However, more data are required to verify the effects of osteotomy and cartilage procedures on the clinical outcomes of MAT. We could not draw conclusions about the differences in complication, reoperation, survivorship, and failure rates between the 2 groups because we did not obtain sufficient data.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Patellofemoral Joint: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 3009-3018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Matthew C. Sweet ◽  
Kelechi R. Okoroha ◽  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Betina Hinckel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Chondral Defects ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: The initial focus of cartilage restoration algorithms has been on the femur; however, the patellofemoral compartment accounts for 20% to 30% of significant symptomatic chondral pathologies. While patellofemoral compartment treatment involves a completely unique subset of comorbidities, with a comprehensive and thoughtful approach many patients may benefit from osteochondral allograft treatment. Purpose: To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes and failure rates after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the patellofemoral joint at a minimum 18-month follow-up. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature regarding the existing evidence for clinical outcomes and failure rates of OCA for patellofemoral joint chondral defects was performed with the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and MEDLINE from studies published between 1990 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were as follows: clinical outcomes and failure rates of OCA for the treatment of chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint, English language, minimum follow-up of 18 months, minimum study size of 5 patients, and human studies. The methodological quality of each study was assessed with a modified version of the Coleman methodology score. Results: The systematic search identified 8 studies with a total of 129 patients. The methods of graft procurement and storage time included fresh (121 patients, 93.8%), and cryopreserved (8 patients, 6.2%) grafts. The mean survival rate was 87.9% at 5 years and 77.2% at 10 years. The following outcome scores showed significant improvement from pre- to postoperative status: modified d’Aubigné-Postel, International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Society Score–Function, and Lysholm Knee Score. Conclusion: OCA of the patellofemoral joint results in improved patient-reported outcome measures with high patient satisfaction rates. Five- and 10-year survival rates of 87.9% and 77.2%, respectively, can be expected after this procedure. These findings should be taken with caution, as a high percentage of patellofemoral osteochondral allografts were associated with concomitant procedures; therefore, further research is warranted to determine the effect of isolated osteochondral transplantations.

Clinical Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Respect to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110361
Author(s):  
Lisa Su ◽  
Ignacio Garcia-Mansilla ◽  
Benjamin Kelley ◽  
Armin Arshi ◽  
Peter Fabricant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Fresh Frozen

Background: Arthroscopic-assisted meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has become a viable and effective treatment option for young active patients with postmeniscectomy pain. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is imperative to evaluate the clinical significance of surgical interventions and inform clinical practice guidelines in orthopaedic surgery. Purpose: To perform a systematic review of clinical outcome studies of patients undergoing MAT and compare postoperative improvement with established MCID thresholds. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-analysis was performed using data obtained from studies reporting patient-reported outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing isolated lateral MAT using fresh-frozen grafts. Weighted mean postoperative improvements in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain) were calculated and compared with MCID values to determine if they met the MCID threshold. Results: A total of 35 studies were identified, including 1658 unique patients. Weighted mean postoperative score improvements exceeded MCID thresholds for the VAS pain, IKDC, and Lysholm. Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing isolated lateral fresh-frozen MAT demonstrated postoperative improvements exceeding the MCID for the Lysholm and VAS pain. Conclusion: Evaluating postoperative PROMs with respect to the MCID is crucial to evaluate the effect of MAT on functional improvement. The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that postoperative improvements after MAT are clinically meaningful as reflected by PROMs exceeding the MCID threshold for the IKDC, Lysholm, and VAS pain.

scholarly journals Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711881846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Michael L. Redondo ◽  
David R. Christian ◽  
Brandon C. Cabarcas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Lysholm Score ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: Traditionally, the primary outcome in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been long-term survivorship; however, short-term clinically significant outcomes are necessary to fully evaluate patient improvement after surgery. Purpose: To (1) establish the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) with respect to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and (2) evaluate preoperative and intraoperative variables correlated with achieving these threshold values. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional registry was queried for all MATs performed between 1999 and 2017. The following PROM scores were collected: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Patients who completed preoperative and postoperative PROMs within a 1-month window were included to calculate the distribution-based MCID at this interval. An anchor question regarding satisfaction with surgery was asked at the same time point and was employed to determine the PASS using nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve/area under the curve analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to correlate patient demographics, medical history, and concomitant procedures to propensity in achieving the MCID and PASS. Results: A total of 98 patients who underwent MAT met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, of whom 10 underwent concomitant ligamentous procedures, 65 underwent concomitant cartilage procedures, and 7 underwent concomitant realignment procedures. The mean patient age was 29.4 ± 9.0 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 5.2 kg/m2. The distribution-based MCID and PASS were determined for the Lysholm score (12.3 and 66.5) and IKDC (9.9 and 36.0) as well as the KOOS Pain (9.9 and N/A ), Symptoms (9.7 and 73.0), Activities of Daily Living (9.5 and N/A), Sport (13.3 and N/A), and Quality of Life (14.6 and 53.0) subscales, respectively. A preoperative Short Form Physical Component Summary (SF PCS) score greater than 32.0 was predictive of postoperative satisfaction. Patients with work-related claims had a reduced likelihood of achieving the MCID for the IKDC and the PASS for the KOOS Symptoms. An increased BMI was also associated with failing to achieve the PASS for the KOOS Quality of Life (QOL). Conclusion: This study established the MCID and PASS for the Lysholm score, IKDC, and KOOS in patients undergoing MAT. Workers’ compensation and higher BMI were associated with failing to achieve clinically significant values. Lower preoperative Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS scores were predictive of achieving the MCID, while higher preoperative SF PCS scores were associated with achieving satisfaction after MAT.

scholarly journals Patient Satisfaction and Return to Sports after Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0025
Author(s):  
Gregory Louis Cvetanovich ◽  
David R. Christian ◽  
Grant Hoerig Garcia ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Michael L. Redondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Sport ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Weight Lifting ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sporting Activities

Objectives: To investigate the ability of patients to return to sport following arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Methods: Patients undergoing arthroscopic MAT between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients completed an outcome survey regarding return to sports in addition to patient reported outcome measures. Subsequent surgery and failure (total meniscectomy, revision MAT, or total or partial knee arthroplasty) were also evaluated. Results: Of 117 MAT performed, 87 patients (74.4%) were available at average 3.6 year follow-up. The average age at time of surgery was 29.0+/-8.3. All 84 patients underwent prior ipsilateral knee surgery with an average of 3.5+/-2.1 prior procedures. MAT was lateral in 44 cases (50.6%), medial in 42 cases (48.3%), and combined medial and lateral in one case (1.1%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 72 patients (82.7%) including cartilage restoration (65, 74.7%), realignment (9, 10.3%), and ACL reconstruction (9, 10.3%). Patients experienced significant improvement compared to preoperative Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 physical scores (p < 0.001). Within three years prior to MAT, 82 patients (94.3%) reported participation in sporting activities. Due to knee symptoms, 62 patients (75.6%) discontinued at least one sport prior to MAT. Of the 82 patients participating in sports preoperatively, 62 patients (75.6%) returned to at least one sport at an average of 12.3 months after MAT. Rates of return to specific sports were highest for light weight lifting, yoga, swimming, and cycling and all RTS rates are shown in Table 1. The percentage of patients participating in sports above the recreational level declined significantly (46.0% prior to symptoms versus 8.2% after MAT, p < 0.001). The most common reasons for decreasing level of sport postoperatively were: to prevent further damage (73.6%), pain or swelling with sports (51.4%), fear of further injury (48.6%), surgeon recommendation (33.3%), and decision to pursue other activities (11.1%). Patients reported being satisfied with their ability to participate in sports at a rate of 63.2%, and 78.8% reported they would still undergo MAT with the benefit of hindsight. Reoperation was performed in 26 patients (29.9%) with 12 patients experiencing failure (13.7%; 1 TKA, 2 UKA, 9 total meniscectomy). Conclusion: In a complex patient population undergoing arthroscopic MAT, 75.6% of patients were able to return to at least one sport at an average of 12.3 months postoperatively. Level of sport declined compared to baseline, with most patients restricting involvement to recreational sports after MAT. The most common reasons for decreasing level of sport were: to prevent further damage, pain or swelling with sports, and fear of further injury. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Cartilage ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-204
Author(s):  
Zaira S. Chaudhry ◽  
Brianna Fram ◽  
R. Frank Henn ◽  
Seth L. Sherman ◽  
Sommer Hammoud
Keyword(s):  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Increasing Trend ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Moderate Positive Correlation ◽  
Insight Into

Objective To identify the 50 most-cited articles in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) research and analyze their characteristics. Design In September 2017, the Scopus database was queried to identify the 50 most-cited articles in MAT research. Variables analyzed include number of citations, publication year, journal, institution, country of origin, article type, study design, and level of evidence. Citation density was calculated for each article. The correlation between citation density and publication year and the correlation between level of evidence and number of citations, citation density, and publication year were computed. Results The 50 most-cited articles were published in 12 journals between 1986 and 2011. The number of citations ranged from 59 to 290 (109.3 ± 48.6). Citation density ranged from 2.7 to 17.6 citations per year (7.0 ± 3.3). There was a positive correlation between citation density and publication year ( r = +0.489, P < 0.001). Overall, 56% of the articles were clinical and 44% were basic science. Of the 28 clinical articles, 61% were level IV or V evidence. Level of evidence was not significantly correlated with number of citations ( r = −0.059, P = 0.766), citation density ( r = +0.030, P = 0.880), or publication year ( r = −0.0009, P = 0.996). Conclusion This analysis provides the orthopedic community with a readily accessible list of the classic citations in MAT research and provides insight into the historical development of this procedure. Although there was a moderate positive correlation between citation density and publication year, articles with stronger levels of evidence were not more frequently cited despite the increasing trend toward evidence-based practice.

scholarly journals Time to Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes after Meniscal Allograft Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0020
Author(s):  
Hailey Huddleston ◽  
Nabil Mehta ◽  
Evan Polce ◽  
Ron Gilat ◽  
Mohamad Alzein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interval Censoring ◽  
Worker's Compensation ◽  
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Worker’S Compensation ◽  
Allograft Transplantation ◽  
Chondral Defects ◽  
Meniscal Allograft ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Compensation Status ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objectives: Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is a surgical treatment option for patients with meniscus deficiencies. Prior studies have defined clinically significant outcomes such as minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for commonly administered patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after MAT. The purpose of this study was to determine the time to achieving MCID and PASS and to identify any risk factors affecting achievement in patients undergoing MAT. Methods: A prospectively maintained MAT registry was retrospectively reviewed from April 2014-May 2020. Patients who underwent revision MAT or did not complete preoperative PROMs were excluded. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were administered preoperatively and at 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years postoperatively. Previously defined MCID and PASS thresholds were utilized and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis with interval censoring was used to calculate the cumulative percentages of MCID, and PASS achievement at each follow-up time interval (5-7, 11-13, and 23-25 months). Results: Eighty-four patients (mean age: 28.2±9.7) were included. Time to MCID and PASS is presented in Table 1. Previously reported PASS values for KOOS Pain, Symptoms, and Sport did not reach an AUC>0.70 and thus were not included in analysis. Worker’s compensation status was found to delay time to achieving MCID for all PROs (HR=0.238-0.305, P=0.008-0.020) and PASS for KOOS Symptoms (HR=0.171, P = 0.026) and IKDC (HR=1.88, P<0.001) (Table 2 and 3). Higher preoperative PRO score was associated with mildly delaying the time to achieving MCID for all PROs (HR=0.947-0.970, P<0.001), while higher preoperative PRO scores were associated with shorter time to achieving PASS on KOOS Symptoms and KOOS QOL (HR=1.030-1.043, P=0.001). Greater BMI (HR=0.946, P=0.020) and the number of focal chondral defects (HR=0.083-0.255, P=0.007-0.029) was associated with delayed MCID for KOOS ADL and QOL, respectively, while concomitant realignment surgery decreased time to MCID on KOOS Sports (HR=2.542, P=0.008). Conclusions: This study defined the time to achieving MCID and PASS on IKDC and KOOS subscores for patients undergoing MAT. Worker’s compensation status, BMI, and the presence of focal chondral defects may prolong time to achievement of MCID and PASS after MAT. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document