Preoperative Meniscal Extrusion Predicts Unsatisfactory Clinical Outcomes and Progression of Osteoarthritis after Isolated Partial Medial Meniscectomy: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

AbstractThe objective of this study was to examine the association between preoperative meniscal extrusion of patients undergoing partial medial meniscectomy with clinical outcomes and progression of osteoarthritis and to determine the extent of meniscal extrusion associated with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and progression of osteoarthritis. Ninety-five patients who underwent partial medial meniscectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative meniscal extrusion was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores for clinical outcomes and with IKDC radiographic scale for osteoarthritis. An ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was used to analyze the variations in meniscal extrusion and the clinical and radiological outcomes. A regression analysis was performed to identify factors that affect preoperative medial meniscus extrusion and that influence results after partial meniscectomy. An optimal cutoff value for meniscal extrusion associated with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and progression of osteoarthritis was established. Significance was set at p < 0.05. The mean ± SD preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores were 59.6 ± 15.5 versus 83.8 ± 13.1 (p < 0.001) and the mean preoperative and postoperative IKDC subjective scores were 59.4 ± 16.8 versus 82.0 ± 15.8 (p < 0.001). Meniscal extrusion greater than 2.2 mm (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 81%) and 2.8 mm (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 85%) was associated with unsatisfactory (poor/fair) Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores, respectively. The progression of osteoarthritis, characterized as a change of at least one category on the IKDC radiographic scale, occurred when meniscal extrusion was greater than 2.2 mm (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 75%). Patients with higher body mass index (BMI) had significantly greater meniscal extrusion that patients with normal BMI (p < 0.001). The medial meniscus was more extruded in patients with horizontal and root tears. In conclusion, patients with preoperative meniscal extrusion of 2.2 mm or greater had unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and progression of osteoarthritis after partial medial meniscectomy at a minimum of 5 years follow-up. Higher BMI and horizontal and root tears were associated with greater preoperative meniscal extrusion.

Download Full-text

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: results at 6-year Mean Follow-up

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967118s00192 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽

pp. 2325967118S0019

Author(s):

Matías Costa-Paz ◽

Carlos Yacuzzi ◽

Franco Luis De-Cicco ◽

Juan Ignacio Theaux ◽

Juan Pablo Zicaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

International Knee Documentation Committee ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Meniscal Extrusion ◽

Average Percentage ◽

Meniscal Allograft ◽

Imaging Results ◽

The Mean ◽

Grade 3

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging results in a series of patients who underwent a meniscal allograft transplant (MAT). Methods A retrospective study was performed. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and physical examinations were reviewed to measure clinical outcomes after MAT. Osteoarthritic changes were assessed by Plain radiography according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification and meniscal extrusion by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Surgical technique and related procedures were analyzed. Complications were registered. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results Surgeries were performed in 41 patients, 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five were male and 11 women. The mean age was 35 years old (SD 8). The mean follow-up was 71 months (range 24 to 184). The mean time between meniscectomy and meniscal transplant was 12.8 years (SD 6,7). Twenty-three were lateral menisci. The following related procedures were performed: Seven ACL reconstructions, 3 ACL revisions, 19 mosaicplasties and 3 osteotomies. The mean preoperative results of IKDC and Lysholm scores were 30.3 (SD 15.5) and 43.8 (SD 16.8) respectively and postoperative results were 78.8 (SD 21.1) and 61.1 (SD 15) respectively. There were no significative radiographic changes at the end of the follow-up. Mean KL preoperative was 2 (IQR 1) and last follow up was 2 (IQR 1) p= 0.053. Preoperative KL grade 1: 33%, grade 2: 50% and grade 3: 17% and last follow up KL grade 1: 22%, grade 2 56% and grade 3 22%. The average percentage of extruded meniscus was 53% in 22 patients evaluated with MR (range 19% to 100%). Five presented arthrofibrosis that required mobilization under anesthesia and partial meniscectomy of the MAT was required in 6 patients. Two transplants failed. Conclusion Although 53% of meniscal extrusion was observed in the MR, we found no correlation with clinical outcomes. MAT achieved good clinical results without osteoarthritic changes after a mean of 6-years follow-up, with 5% of failure. MAT appears to be a safe and effective treatment, which should be considered as a suitable option in the clinical practice.

Download Full-text

Pullout Fixation of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears: Correlation Between Meniscus Extrusion and Midterm Clinical Results

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546516662445 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 45 (1) ◽

pp. 42-49 ◽

Cited By ~ 44

Author(s):

Kyu Sung Chung ◽

Jeong Ku Ha ◽

Ho Jong Ra ◽

Gun Woo Nam ◽

Jin Goo Kim

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Medial Meniscus ◽

Joint Space ◽

Radiographic Findings ◽

Group A ◽

The Mean ◽

Group B ◽

Pullout Fixation ◽

Meniscus Extrusion

Background: Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) lead to extrusion of the meniscus during weightbearing as well as loss of the ability of the meniscus to generate hoop stress. This loss of load-sharing ability leads to progressive arthritic changes. However, there have been no studies that correlate the correction of meniscus extrusion with clinical outcomes. Hypothesis: Decreased meniscus extrusion is associated with better clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with increased meniscus extrusion after MMPRT pullout fixation. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 39 patients who underwent MMPRT pullout fixation and had been observed for more than 5 years were recruited for this study. The mean follow-up period was 69.8 months. Participants were categorized into 2 groups according to the direction of meniscus extrusion: group A (increased extrusion; 23 patients) and group B (decreased extrusion; 16 patients). Meniscus extrusion was assessed in the coronal plane on magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. The postoperative clinical outcomes (Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] scores) and radiographic results (Kellgren-Lawrence [K-L] grade and medial joint space) were compared between groups. Results: Meniscus extrusion in group A increased significantly from a mean (±SD) of 3.5 ± 0.9 mm preoperatively to 5.1 ± 1.4 mm at 1 year postoperatively ( P < .001), whereas in group B, it decreased significantly from 4.1 ± 1.3 mm preoperatively to 3.5 ± 1.4 mm at 1 year postoperatively ( P < .001). The K-L arthritis grade (0/1/2/3/4) significantly progressed in group A (from 2/12/9/0/0 preoperatively to 0/1/14/8/0 postoperatively, respectively; P = .009) but not in group B (from 1/11/4/0/0 preoperatively to 0/6/8/2/0 postoperatively, respectively; P = .274). The mean final Lysholm and IKDC scores in group B (88.1 ± 12.1 and 79.0 ± 11.4, respectively) were significantly better than those in group A (81.0 ± 9.0 and 71.1 ± 7.8, respectively) ( P < .05). There was less medial joint space narrowing at final follow-up in group B (0.6 ± 0.8 mm) than in group A (1.1 ± 0.6 mm) ( P = .015). Progression of the K-L arthritis grade was seen in 50% (8/16) of the patients in group B compared with 87% (20/23) of the patients in group A ( P = .027). Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that in patients with MMPRTs, pullout fixation leads to favorable midterm outcomes, regardless of meniscus extrusion at 1-year follow-up. However, patients with decreased meniscus extrusion at postoperative 1 year have more favorable clinical scores and radiographic findings at midterm follow-up than those with increased extrusion at 1 year. This study indicates that one of the main goals of the repair of MMPRTs is to reduce meniscus extrusion as much as possible.

Download Full-text

Is radiofrequency use in arthroscopic treatment of isolated medial meniscus horizontal cleavage tears more effective than mechanical debridement in young adults?

Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo ◽

10.2298/sarh200225076k ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 76-76

Author(s):

Özgür Korkmaz ◽

Uğur Kasman ◽

Sıtkı Çeçen

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Medial Meniscus ◽

Knee Score ◽

Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy ◽

Vas Score ◽

Bipolar Radiofrequency ◽

Lysholm Knee Score ◽

The Mean ◽

Early Clinical Outcomes

Introduction/Objective. Arthroscopic mechanical hand tools, motorized shavers, and bipolar radiofrequency are used in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy of radiofrequency on early clinical outcomes in patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with horizontal cleavage tear and without additional intraarticular knee pathology. Methods. A total of 37 patients complied with the study criteria. Patients were divided into two groups according to usage of bipolar radiofrequency. Patients were evaluated by using visual analog scale (VAS) and Tegner Lysholm knee scores at the end of the first year follow-up. Results. Twenty-two patients comprised the shaver-using group. Preoperative mean VAS score was 7.9 ? 0.8, and the Tegner Lysholm knee score was 49.6 ? 9.6. Fifteen patients comprised the bipolar radiofrequency-using group. Preoperative VAS score was 7.8 ? 0.9, and the Tegner Lysholm knee score was 52.2 ? 10.7. The mean VAS score was 1.2 ? 0.9, and the mean Tegner Lysholm knee score was 89.5 ? 8.1 in shaver used group at last follow-up. At the last postoperative follow-up, the mean VAS score was 1.1 ? 1, and the Tegner Lysholm knee score was 88.8 ? 7.3 in the bipolar radiofrequency-using group. No statistically significant differences between the VAS and Tegner Lysholm knee scores of the preoperative and postoperative controls of the two groups were observed (p?0.05). Conclusion. Radiofrequency use has no effect on early clinical outcomes in the arthroscopic treatment of isolated medial meniscus posterior horn horizontal cleavage tears; we do not recommend its use

Download Full-text

Arthroscopic-assisted Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-93184/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Biao Chen ◽

Hankun Liu ◽

Haitao Chen ◽

Liaobin Chen ◽

Hua Wang

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

International Knee Documentation Committee ◽

Lateral Approach ◽

Popliteus Tendon ◽

Ikdc Score ◽

The Mean ◽

Improved Function ◽

Tegner Score ◽

Lost To Follow Up

Abstract Background: Popliteus tendinitis is an unusual factor to cause pain of the knee joint in its posterolateral compartment. There are few reports that the arthroscopy used for the treatment of refractory and symptomatic popliteus tendinitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of arthroscopic treatment of popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach and to investigate the pathogenesis and treatment of popliteus tendinitis.Methods: From 2014 to 2018, arthroscopic popliteus tendon ablation was performed in 15 patients (15 knees) with popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Tegner score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score at the 24-month follow-up after surgery.Results: A total of 15 patients (mean age, 51.1 ± 7.1 years) were included; they had a mean body mass index of 23.8 ± 2.1. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. Comparing the postoperative state to the preoperative state, the mean postoperative Lysholm score, Tegner score, and IKDC score improved significantly from 70.0 ± 5.0, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 62.3 ± 5.5 to 89.3 ± 4.2, 4.6 ± 0.61, and 80.5 ± 4.4, respectively (p < 0.01). The preoperative VAS score for pain improved from 4.3 ± 0.7 to 0.9 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01). No patients were lost to follow-up.Conclusion: Following arthroscopic-assisted treatment, all the patients with popliteus tendinitis achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in terms of pain relief and improved function.

Download Full-text

No dynamic extrusion in medial meniscus root lesions - an ultrasound study

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967119s00233 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (6_suppl4) ◽

pp. 2325967119S0023 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Katrin Karpinski ◽

Wolf Petersen

Keyword(s):

Healthy Volunteers ◽

Supine Position ◽

Medial Meniscus ◽

Control Group ◽

Root Tear ◽

Root Injury ◽

Dynamic Extrusion ◽

The Mean ◽

Medial Meniscus Extrusion ◽

Meniscus Extrusion

Aims and Objectives: Extrusion of the medial meniscus in MRI is an indirect radiological sign for a meniscus root tear. However, a recent study has shown that ultrasound-detectable dynamic extrusion is considered physiological in healthy volunteers. The aim of our study was to analyze the dynamic meniscal extrusion in patients with proven root injury in ultrasound. Our hypothesis was that dynamic extrusion is reduced in patients with root injury of the medial meniscus compared to healthy volunteers. Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria for this prospective study were MRI signs for a root lesion of the medial meniscus (ghost sign, extrusion > 3 mm). An age matched group of healthy volunteers served as control. Exclusion criterion was osteoarthritis > II° of the medial compartment according to Kellgren & Lawrence. The extrusion of the medial meniscus (MME) of the affected knee was measured by ultrasound (US) in supine position and under full weight bearing. Results: 25 patients with a medial root lesion were included in the study. The evaluation of the ultrasound results revealed a significant decreased dynamic medial displacement of the meniscus in patients with root injury. In the supine position, the mean medial meniscus extrusion was 3.60 mm (± 1.00 mm). In the standing position, the mean medial meniscus extrusion increased to 3.72 mm (± 0.96 mm). The mean delta-extrusion was 0.11 mm (± 0.17 mm). This difference was statistically not significant. In 14 patients, no dynamic extrusion was detectable at all. All patients belonging to the medial root tear group had a significant varus deformity (mechanical axis hits the tibial joint line more than 15 mm medially form the center). In the control group, the mean medial meniscus extrusion was 1.34 mm (± 0.37 mm) in supine position and 2.20 mm (± 0.34 mm) under full weight bearing. The mean delta-extrusion was 0.85 mm (± 0.30 mm). The difference in mean delta-extrusion between the root tear and control group was statistically significant. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a diagnostic tool to detect the dynamic extrusion of the medial meniscus. Lack of dynamic extrusion (“dead meniscus sign”) may serve as an indicator for medial root injury.

Download Full-text

Midterm Outcomes of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair: A Systematic Review

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546521998297 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 036354652199829

Author(s):

Peter S. Chang ◽

Logan Radtke ◽

Patrick Ward ◽

Robert H. Brophy

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Medial Meniscus ◽

International Knee Documentation Committee ◽

Cartilage Degeneration ◽

Long Term Results ◽

Systematic Analysis ◽

Meniscus Root ◽

Functional Benefit

Background: Whereas there has been growing interest in surgical repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs), our understanding of the medium- and long-term results of this procedure is still evolving. Purpose: To report midterm clinical outcomes from PMMRT repairs. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A literature review for this systematic analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We identified studies that reported the results of arthroscopic repair of PMMRTs. Functional and imaging outcomes were reviewed and summarized. Results: In total, 28 studies with a total of 994 patients (83% female) with an overall mean age of 57.1 were included in this review. Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Tegner scores) were improved at final follow-up in all studies. Of patients, 49% had radiographic progression of at least 1 grade in the Kellgren-Lawrence scale at a mean follow-up of 4.0 years in 11 studies. Cartilage degeneration had progressed at least 1 grade on magnetic resonance imaging scans in 23% of patients at a mean follow-up of 31.6 months in 4 studies. Conclusion: PMMRT repairs provide a functional benefit with consistent improvements in clinical outcome scores. There is some evidence that PMMRT repair slows the progression of osteoarthritis but does not prevent it at midterm follow-up.

Download Full-text

Correlation between meniscal extrusion and symptom duration, alignment, and arthritic changes in medial meniscus posterior root tear: research article

Knee Surgery and Related Research ◽

10.1186/s43019-019-0019-x ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 32 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Dong Hwi Kim ◽

Gwang Chul Lee ◽

Hyun Hak Kim ◽

Dong Hyuk Cha

Keyword(s):

Medial Meniscus ◽

Posterior Root ◽

Root Tear ◽

X Ray ◽

Posterior Root Tear ◽

Grade Ii ◽

The Mean ◽

Medial Meniscus Extrusion ◽

Meniscus Extrusion ◽

Grade Iii

Abstract Background Medial meniscus posterior root tear can result in medial meniscus extrusion. However, the severity of medial meniscus extrusion is different in each root tear patient. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that contribute to the severity of medial meniscus extrusion with medial meniscus posterior root tear, such as duration of disease, the degree of arthritis—chondral wear, subchondral edema, osteophyte size, and Kellgren–Lawrence (K/L) grade—and mechanical alignment for appropriate treatment method. Methods From January 2009 to August 2014, we retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and simple x-ray of 99 patients with medial meniscus posterior root tear. The duration of the disease was identified through retrospective chart review. The severity of medial meniscus extrusion, the presence of subchondral edema, the degree of chondral wear, and the size of the osteophyte were measured on MRI. K/L grade was confirmed on simple x-ray, and the mechanical axis was measured on whole extremity radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed by using bivariate correlation analysis and one-way analysis of variance. Results The mean medial meniscus extrusion was 4.61 mm, and the mean duration of the disease was 15.52 months. The mean degree of chondral wear was 25.8%, and 63 out of 99 cases showed subchondral edema. The average alignment was 4.30 degrees, and the average size of the osteophyte was 1.48 mm. There were 40 cases (40.4%) with K/L grade I, 48 cases (48.5%) with grade II, 11 cases (11.1%) with grade III, and no cases with grade IV. In the group mean analysis between the K/L grade and the severity of medial meniscus extrusion, the average medial meniscus extrusions were 3.97 mm in grade I, 4.93 mm in grade II, and 5.59 mm in grade III. There was a statistical significance between the size of the osteophyte and the severity of medial meniscus extrusion (P = 0.000), K/L grade, and the severity of medial meniscus extrusion (P = 0.001). Conclusions The severity of medial meniscus extrusion with medial meniscus posterior horn root tear is associated with the size of the osteophyte and K/L grade.

Download Full-text

Multiple ACL Revision: Failure Analysis and Clinical Outcomes

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0039-3400741 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Francesco Dini ◽

Andrea Tecame ◽

Aldo Ampollini ◽

Paolo Adravanti

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Acl Reconstruction ◽

Cruciate Ligament ◽

Tibial Tunnel ◽

International Knee Documentation Committee ◽

Sports Activity ◽

Technical Errors ◽

Revision Acl Reconstruction ◽

The Mean

AbstractAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction represents one of the most successful orthopedic surgical procedures. Nevertheless, ACL revisions are still very frequent, with a small but relevant number of failures. The purpose of this study is to analyze the failure causes and the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent a re-revision ACL reconstruction. Between January 2009 and December 2017, 263 ACL revisions were performed by a single senior surgeon. Seventeen patients (12 males and 5 females) underwent re-revision ACL reconstruction meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 28.4 years (range, 19–41 years). Before the re-revision, the patients were evaluated preoperatively and after a mean follow-up of 29 months (range, 13–58 months). Assessment included subjective and objective evaluations (Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]), KT-2000 arthrometer, radiographic study, and preoperative computed tomography scan. Five patients showed a too anterior previous femoral tunnel and seven a too vertical and posterior tibial tunnel; eight meniscal tears were found. Five patients had grade III–IV according to Outerbridge cartilage lesions. IKDC showed a statistically significant improvement (A + B 35%, C + D 65% preop, A + B 82%, C + D 18% postop, odds ratio: 0.1169; p = 0.0083). The mean Lysholm score ranged from 43 ± 9 to 87 ± 7 (p < 0.001). The KT-2000 arthrometer showed a statistically significant improvement from a mean of 5.8 ± 1.4 to 1.5 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001) at last follow-up. Out of 17 patients, only 4 returned to sports activity at the same preinjury levels. Postoperatively at the last follow-up after last revision surgery, no osteoarthritis evolution was observed. This study showed good clinical and radiological results after the last revision ACL surgery in patients with multiple failures of ACL reconstruction but only one-fourth of the patients returned to the same preoperative sport level. Traumatic events, technical errors, and untreated peripheral lesions are the main causes of multiple previous failures; the worst clinical outcomes were found in the patients with high grade of chondral lesions.

Download Full-text

Arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy

Vojnosanitetski pregled ◽

10.2298/vsp1109774d ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 68 (9) ◽

pp. 774-778 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Zarko Dasic ◽

Dragan Radoicic

Keyword(s):

Medial Meniscus ◽

International Knee Documentation Committee ◽

Recreational Sports ◽

Medial Meniscectomy ◽

Meniscal Lesions ◽

Meniscus Tears ◽

Ikdc Score ◽

The Mean ◽

Bucket Handle ◽

Repair Techniques

Background/Aim. Meniscal injuries are common in professional or recreational sports as well as in daily activities. If meniscal lesions lead to physical impairment they usually require surgical treatment. Arthroscopic treatment of meniscal injuries is one of the most often performed orthopedic operative procedures. Methods. The study analyzed the results of arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy in 213 patients in a 24-month period, from 2006, to 2008. Results. In our series of arthroscopically treated medial meniscus tears we noted 78 (36.62%) vertical complete bucket handle lesions, 19 (8.92%) vertical incomplete lesions, 18 (8.45%) longitudinal tears, 35 (16.43%) oblique tears, 18 (8.45%) complex degenerative lesions, 17 (7.98%) radial lesions and 28 (13.14%) horisontal lesions. Mean preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 49.81%, 1 month after the arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy the mean IKDC score was 84.08%, and 6 months after mean IKDC score was 90.36%. Six months after the procedure 197 (92.49%) of patients had good or excellent subjective postoperative clinical outcomes, while 14 (6.57%) patients subjectively did not notice a significant improvement after the intervention, and 2 (0.93%) patients had no subjective improvement after the partial medial meniscectomy at all. Conclusion. Arthroscopic partial medial meniscetomy is minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedure and in well selected cases is a method of choice for treatment of medial meniscus injuries when repair techniques are not a viable option. It has small rate of complications, low morbidity and fast rehabilitation.

Download Full-text