Anti-Xa Monitoring of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Amalie Baun Kjaergaard ◽  
Jens Fuglsang ◽  
Anne-Mette Hvas

AbstractLow-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is commonly used for preventing or treating venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) during pregnancy. The physiological changes in maternal metabolism have led to discussions on optimal LMWH dosing strategy and possible need for monitoring. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and discuss whether LMWH dose adjustment according to anti-Xa provides superior effectiveness and safety compared with weight adjusted or fixed dosed LMWH in pregnant women. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on September 26, 2020. The study is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Effectiveness was defined as episodes of thrombosis and safety as bleeding episodes. In total, 33 studies were included: 4 randomized controlled studies and 29 cohort studies. Prophylactic dosing strategies employing weight dosed, fixed dosed, or anti-Xa adjusted LMWH dosing performed equal in effectiveness and safety. In pregnant women with VTE or high thromboembolic risk, therapeutic weight–adjusted LMWH and weight plus anti-Xa-adjusted LMWH provided equal results in terms of effectiveness and safety. Pregnant women with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) received therapeutic anti-Xa-adjusted LMWH with four out of seven studies presenting mean peak anti-Xa within target ranges. Still, pregnant women with MHV experienced both thrombosis and bleeding with anti-Xa in target. Based on the results of this systematic review, current evidence does not support the need for anti-Xa monitoring when using LMWH as thromboprophylaxis or treatment during pregnancy. Nonetheless, the need for anti-Xa monitoring in pregnant women with MHV may need further scrutiny.

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 543-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andra H. James ◽  
Leo R. Brancazio ◽  
Thomas R. Gehrig ◽  
Andrew Wang ◽  
Thomas L. Ortel

Global Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Anish Keepanasseril ◽  
Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai ◽  
Jyoti Baghel ◽  
Swaraj Nandini Pande ◽  
Nivedita Mondal ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (8) ◽  
pp. 934-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Skeith ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Susan E. Robinson ◽  
Samah Alimam ◽  
Marc A. Rodger

Abstract We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnant women with essential thrombocythemia. Twenty-one trials and 756 pregnancies met inclusion criteria. The absolute VTE risk in the antepartum period is not above a threshold where low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis is clearly indicated or below a threshold where LMWH should be withheld (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.3-4.3). Postpartum, the absolute VTE risk is above a threshold where postpartum LMWH prophylaxis should be considered (4.4%; 95% CI, 1.2-9.5).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document