Direct End-to-End Neurorrhaphy for Wrist-Level Long Nerve Defect with Fixation of the Wrist in Flexion: Technique Note

Author(s):  
Chun-Ching Lu ◽  
Hui-Kuang Huang ◽  
Jung-Pan Wang

Abstract Background For a nerve gap, end-to-end neurorrhaphy would either be difficult or would include tension. The use of a nerve graft or conduit could be a solution, but it might compromise the reinnervation. We describe a method for wrist-level ulnar and/or median long nerve injury by fixing the wrist in the flexion position with K-wire (s) to make possible an end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy. Patients and Methods Two patients had wrist-level ulnar nerve injury for 2 and 3 months and nerve gaps of 2.5 cm and 3.5 cm, respectively, after the neuroma excision. K-wires were used to transfix from the radius to carpal bones, in order to keep their wrists in flexion of 45 and 65 degrees, respectively, with which the tension-free end-to-end neurorrhaphy could be achieved. The K-wires were removed in 6 weeks after surgery, and their wrists were kept in the splint for a progressive extension program. Results Both patients were noted to have an improved claw hand deformity 4 months after the surgery. The ulnar nerve motor and sensory function could be recovered mostly in the 12-month follow-up. The wrist flexion and extension motion arc both achieved, at least, 150 degree in the 12-month follow-up. There were no complications related to the K-wire fixation. Conclusion With the wrist fixed in a flexed position, maintaining a longer nerve gap to achieve a direct end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy would be more likely and safer. Without the use of nerve graft, innervation of the injured nerve would be faster.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-61
Author(s):  
Krishna Sapkota ◽  
Krishna Wahegaonkar ◽  
Niraj Ranjeet ◽  
Pabin Thapa ◽  
Upendra Jung Thapa ◽  
...  

Background: Supracondylar fracture of distal humerus is the most common paediatric fracture. Type III supracondylar fractures should be treated with anatomical reduction and stable Kirschner wire (K- wire, pin) fixation to prevent the cosmetic deformity. The configuration of wires is debatable. Although two crossed K-wires are bio-mechanically stable, there is a risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Lateral 3 K-wires is a good alternative. This study was done to compare the outcome of cross K- wire and lateral 3 K-wires in terms of stability. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study done in Manipal Teaching Hospital. All the Gartland type 3 supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus were treated with closed reduction and stabilized with K wires. In Group I, fractures were stabilized with cross K wire fixation and in group II they were stabilized with 3 lateral K-wires. The patients were followed up at 4-5 weeks for wire removal and at 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Baumann's angle, a functional outcome as per Flynn's criteria, and range of motion were recorded in each visit. Outcomes were compared in term of displacement of fracture. Result: Seventeen children in each group were taken up for the study. There were no significant differences in term of patients and fracture character. No patients had significant loss of reduction at final follow up. There is no statistically significant difference seen in mean changes of Bauman's angle. According to Flynn's criteria good result was seen in more than 95% of cases in both groups. Conclusion: Both cross K-wires and Lateral 3 K-wires provide good stability. Fixation of supracondylar fracture from lateral side had an advantage of no risk of iatrogenic Ulnar nerve injury. Addition of third K-wire from lateral side provides good stability as that of cross K- wire fixation.


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. ROSÉN ◽  
G. LUNDBORG

This study presents a predicted five-year reference interval for the outcome following repair of the median or ulnar nerve in adults. Forty-four patients were examined with the use of a recently introduced model instrument for documentation after nerve repair that includes “sensory”, “motor”, and “pain/discomfort” outcomes which together constitute a summarized “total score”. Analysis of the “total score” showed that follow-up time and age significantly influence the outcome. There were obvious inferior “motor” results after ulnar nerve injury, but these did not significantly influence the “total score”. Significant improvements in the “total score” were seen throughout the follow-up period.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 476-480
Author(s):  
Farhan Majeed ◽  
Mudasser Saddique ◽  
Hafiz Nasir ◽  
Ahmad Shams

Around the elbow, supracondylar injury of humerus is one of the conventional fractures which usually occurs at the age of 7 to 8 years. Various conservative techniques have been used for the management, which comprises of the splintage, tractions, open or closed reduction with k wire fixation. However, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning remains the mainstay of surgical management, for they have shown splendid outcomes according to many authors. Objectives: The aim of this study is to summarise and compare the radiological and functional results of two ways of fixation (cross and parallel closed K wires) of supracondylar fractures in children. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore. Period: 1st January 2018 to 31st June 2018. Material & Methods: We included 180 patients (90 in each group). Results: The mean age was 6.45±2.34 years with 115(63.9%) male and 65(36.1%) female. Among the children who underwent fixation with cross k-wires, ulnar nerve injury was seen in 2(2.2%) cases and none were seen in the other group post operatively. Group A attained higher union rate at last follow up. 4(4.4%) cases in Cross K-wires and 19(21.1%) in two lateral k-wires gave outstanding outcome. In a nutshell, 60 in group A and 45 in group B showed excellent outcomes based on Flynn's criteria, p-value < 0.05. Conclusion: According to Flynn’s criteria, closed percutaneous cross K-wire fixation of supracondylar fracture of humerus is an effective management option in terms of finer functional results as compared to Parallel k-wires. Although, the rate of radiological union is higher in cross k-wire fixation, there are 2.2% chances of ulnar nerve injury.


Author(s):  
Melanie D. Luikart ◽  
Justin M. Kistler ◽  
David Kahan ◽  
Richard McEntee ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas

Abstract Background There has been an increasing utilization of end-to-end (ETE) and reverse “supercharged” end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve transfers (NTs) for treatment of high ulnar nerve injury. This study aimed to review the potential indications for, and outcomes of, ETE and SETS AIN–ulnar NT. Methods A literature review was performed, and 10 articles with 156 patients who had sufficient follow-up to evaluate functional outcomes were included. English studies were included if they reported the outcome of patients with ulnar nerve injuries treated with AIN to ulnar motor NT. Outcomes were analyzed based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, grip and key pinch strength, and interosseous Medical Research Council–graded motor strength. Comparisons were made using the independent t-test and the chi-square test. No nerve graft control group was required for eligibility. Ulnar nerve injury types varied. Results NT resulted in 77% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, 53.7 ± 19.8 lb grip strength recovery, 61 ± 21% key pinch recovery, and a mean DASH score of 33.4 ± 16. In this diverse group, NT resulted in significantly greater M3+ recovery and grip strength recovery measured in pounds than in the nerve graft/conventional treatment group, and ETE repairs had significantly better outcomes compared with SETS repairs for grip strength, key pinch strength, and DASH scores, but heterogeneity limits interpretation. Conclusion ETE and SETS AIN–ulnar NTs produce significant restoration of ulnar nerve motor function for high ulnar nerve injuries. For ulnar nerve transection injuries at or above the elbow, ETE NT results in superior motor recovery compared with nerve grafting/conventional repair. However, further research is needed to determine the best treatment for other types of ulnar nerve injury and the role of SETS NT.


1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. VASTAMÄKI ◽  
P. K. KALLIO ◽  
K. A. SOLONEN

110 patients with injuries to the ulnar nerve were assessed, on average, 12.7 (3–20) years after secondary repair. 89 were male and 21 female, with a mean age of 27.9 years. Most of the nerve lesions were sharp (63) or blunt (41) injuries. Division was total in 76 cases and most were at the forearm level. The average delay from the injury to the operation was 10.1 (1–48) months. Secondary repair was performed in 34 cases and fascicular grafting in 76 cases. The mean graft length was 5.4 (1–30) cm. Four factors of motor and sensory function were assessed and the quantitative evaluation was compared with the MRC classification. Useful results were obtained in only 51.8% and poor in 30.9%. The age of the patient, the width of contusion, the pre-operative delay, and the level of the injury influenced the results significantly.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Ceynowa ◽  
Rafał Pankowski ◽  
Marek Rocławski ◽  
Tomasz Mazurek

1987 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Duinslaeger ◽  
A. DeBacker ◽  
L. Ceulemans ◽  
P. Wylock

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2873-2875
Author(s):  
Mudassar Nazzar ◽  
Muhammad Adeel-Ur- Rehman ◽  
Rizwan Anwar ◽  
Omer Farooq Tanveer ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Hanan ◽  
...  

Objectives: To compare the complications and outcomes of lateral entry pin fixation with medial and lateral pin fixation for Gartland type III supracondylar fractures of humerus. Methodology: This prospective comparative study involving 190 patients of Gartland type III close supracondylar fractures were included. from March-2019 to Dec-2020. In all patients, initially the elbow was mobilized using the splint placed above the elbow joint at 30 to 45 degrees’ flexion. After closed reduction, lateral pinning was applied in group I and in group II lateral and medial cross pinning was applied using the standard protocol. Patients were followed for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, radiologic and function outcomes in-terms of loss of reduction, elbow range of motion, loss in carrying angle and functional outcomes. Results: The two groups were comparable for loss of elbow range of motion, loss of carrying angle and loss of Bauman's angle. On clinical examination, immediate post-operative ulnar nerve injury was diagnosed in 4 (4.2%) cases in group II and in no patient in group I (p-value 0.12). Satisfactory functional outcomes were achieved in 85 (89.5%) patients in group I and in 88 (92.6%) patients in group II (p-value 0.44). Conclusion: Lateral pinning provided stable fixation clinically and radiologically as compared to lateral and medial cross pinning. Keywords: Supracondylar fracture of Humerus, Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, Lateral pin entry, lateral and medial cross pin entry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document