Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) Visiting Policies: A Worldwide Survey

Author(s):  
Anna Camporesi ◽  
Anna Zanin ◽  
Constantinos Kanaris ◽  
Marco Gemma ◽  
Vanessa Soares Lanziotti

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) visiting policies around the world and how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected these policies, due to concerns relating to a viral transmission. A web-based international survey was designed and disseminated through social networks, emails, or direct messages. Two hundred forty-one answers were received. From these, 26 were excluded (13 due to missing location and 13 duplicated answers), resulting in a final number of 215 answers. Europe accounted for 35% of responses (n = 77), South America 22.4% (n = 49), North America 19% (n = 41), Asia 16.5% (n = 36), Central America 2.7% (n = 6), Oceania, and Africa 2.2% each (n = 5 each). Before the pandemic, reported admission/visiting policies already varied between continents. Family time schedules remained similar to the pre-pandemic period in half of European, Central, and South American units and have changed in 60% of Asian, African, North American, and Oceanian units. Access to PICUs has been granted for patients and caregivers tested negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS COV-2) in only part of studied PICUs. Isolation precautions for the visitors were intensified at the onset of the pandemic. Changes in visiting policies were observed in most PICUs worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, with some PICUs prohibiting any visitation by families. These changes can decrease possibilities of parental participation in emotional support and reduction of sedation needs, early mobility, and shared decision-making process and impact negatively both children and parental well-being and even patients' outcomes.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Emma Mellgren ◽  
Janet Mattsson

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the nurses’ approach to three sources of sound that contribute to high noise levels; alarms, doors that open and conversation.Methods: Methods used derived from a theoretical perspective based on interpretive phenomenology and caring culture. In the pediatric intensive care, the caregivers of the children work in a high-tech environment as they are surrounded by sound from several sources. How caregivers understand and acknowledge how these sounds negatively affect a child’s well-being depends on their individual knowledge and awareness of how children are affected by sound. In most cases, coming into an intensive care unit is a new experience for a child. This causes greater stress, both from the environment itself as well as from sound levels. The method was built on a phenomenological perspective and an interpretive non-participation, semi-structured observations were conducted in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of one of Sweden’s metropolitan regions in the winter of 2014-2015.Results: The results show that noise is an overlooked phenomenon in the pediatric intensive care environment as it has given way to other priorities in the nurse’s work. It is also apparent that this depends on the department’s caring culture as it prioritizes other things, resulting in normalizing high levels of noise as a part of the pediatric intensive care environment.Conclusions: Noise levels are not a priority in the department’s caring culture. High noise levels are permitted unreflectedly and appears to be a token of potency and an accepted part of the health care environment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 394-394
Author(s):  
Kristina Betters ◽  
David Farthing ◽  
Stephanie Sparacino ◽  
Lauren Perrino ◽  
Tricia Easley ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e369
Author(s):  
Neha Gupta ◽  
Amber Sones ◽  
Maegan Powell ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Mattsson ◽  
Maria Forsner ◽  
Maaret Castrén ◽  
Maria Arman

Children in the pediatric intensive care unit are indisputably in a vulnerable position, dependent on nurses to acknowledge their needs. It is assumed that children should be approached from a holistic perspective in the caring situation to meet their caring needs. The aim of the study was to unfold the meaning of nursing care through nurses’ concerns when caring for children in the pediatric intensive care unit. To investigate the qualitative aspects of practice embedded in the caring situation, the interpretive phenomenological approach was adopted for the study. The findings revealed three patterns: medically oriented nursing—here, the nurses attend to just the medical needs, and nursing care is at its minimum, leaving the children’s needs unmet; parent-oriented nursing care—here, the nursing care emphasizes the parents’ needs in the situation, and the children are viewed as a part of the parent and not as an individual child with specific caring needs; and smooth operating nursing care orientation—here, the nursing care is focused on the child as a whole human being, adding value to the nursing care. The conclusion drawn suggests that nursing care does not always respond to the needs of the child, jeopardizing the well-being of the child and leaving them at risk for experiencing pain and suffering. The concerns present in nursing care has been shown to be the divider of the meaning of nursing care and need to become elucidated in order to improve the cultural influence of what can be seen as good nursing care within the pediatric intensive care unit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 608-608
Author(s):  
Neha Gupta ◽  
Amber Sones ◽  
Maegan Powell ◽  
Johanna Robbins ◽  
Stephanie Wilson ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-374
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Rosini ◽  
Mary C. Howell ◽  
I. David Todres ◽  
John Dorman

Work relationships among staff in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) are probably of critical importance to patient care, as well as to staff well-being. Group discussions were introduced in one ICU to encourage the staff to raise issues about work relationships and about the effectiveness of the care they were providing. Three kinds of issues recurred: work roles and functions, leadership and decision making, and conflict arising from stereotypic assumptions about opposed groups. The frequency of conflicts rooted in these issues demonstrated their origin in factors over and above individual "personality problems." While there were clear limitations to what such group meetings could accomplish, they did provide a forum for the expression of tensions and anxieties, the identification and resolution of some conflict, and the initiation of needed policy change. The authors encourage further experimentation with this practice, and studies of its effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document