The Reconstruction of Anterior Skull Base Defects after Craniofacial Tumor Resection

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Shkout ◽  
Yuri Shanko
Skull Base ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana Christiano ◽  
Dare Ajibade ◽  
Jean Eloy ◽  
James Liu

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Anderson Eloy ◽  
Osamah J. Choudhry ◽  
Lana D. Christiano ◽  
Dare V. Ajibade ◽  
James K. Liu

Author(s):  
Axel Wolf ◽  
Alexandros Andrianakis ◽  
Peter Valentin Tomazic ◽  
Michael Mokry ◽  
Georg Clarici ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate the frequency, type and indications of nasal turbinate (NT) resection during endoscopic, anterior skull base surgery and to analyze factors that may have an impact on the need of NT removal. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 306 subjects (150 males and 156 females, mean age 55.4 ± 15.3 years) who underwent multidisciplinary, transnasal, endoscopic tumor surgery of the anterior skull base using 4-handed techniques between 2011 and 2019 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Graz, were included. Results In the majority of interventions (n = 281/306; 91.8%), all NT were preserved. Significant factors influencing the need of NT resections turned out to be type of endoscopic approach (p < 0.001; V = 0.304), sagittal (p = 0.003; d = 0.481) and transversal (p = 0.017; d = 0.533) tumor diameter, tumor type (p < 0.001; V = 0.355) and tumor location (p < 0.001; V = 0.324). Conclusions NT can be preserved in the majority of patients undergoing tumor resection in anterior, transnasal, skullbase surgery and routine resection of NT should be avoided. Variables that have an impact on the need of NT resections are types of endoscopic approaches, sagittal and transversal tumor extension and tumor type. These factors should be considered in planning of surgery and preoperative information of patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1763-1765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent L. Biron ◽  
Menachem Gross ◽  
Robert Broad ◽  
Hadi Seikaly ◽  
Erin D. Wright

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawina Jiramongkolchai ◽  
Jake J. Lee ◽  
Cristine N. Klatt-Cromwell ◽  
Albert H. Kim ◽  
Michael R. Chicoine ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Mohamed Elnokaly ◽  
Gordon Mao ◽  
Khaled A. Aziz

Background: The minimally invasive approaches to the anterior skull base region through fronto-orbital craniotomy remain a highly accepted option that gains countenance and predilection over time. The transpalpebral “eyelid” incision is an under-utilized and more recent technique that offers a safe efficient corridor to manage a wide variety of lesions. Methods: We carried a retrospective study of 44 patients operated on by the fronto-orbital craniotomy through transpalpebral “eyelid” incision for intracranial tumors, in the time period from March 2007 to July 2016. The results from surgeries were analyzed; extent of tumor resection, length of hospital stay, cosmetic outcome, and complications. Results: Out of the 44 intracranial tumor cases, we had 16 male and 28 female patients with median age 54 years. We had 19 anterior skull base lesions, 8 middle skull base lesions and 8 parasellar lesions. We also operated on four frontal intraparenchymal lesions and four other various lesions. Total resection was achieved in 32 cases (72.7%), with excellent cosmetic outcome in 43 cases (97.7%). Average hospital stay was 6 days. No major complications recorded. Three cases (6.8%) had complications that varied between pseudomeningocele, wound infections, and facial pain. Follow-up average period was 23.6 months. Conclusion: The fronto-orbital approach through eyelid incision remains a reliable approach to the skull base. It provides natural anatomical dissection planes through the eyelid incision and a fronto-orbital craniotomy, creating a wide surgical corridor to manage specific lesions with consistent surgical and cosmetic outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document