New Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis

2004 ◽  
Vol 351 (25) ◽  
pp. 2659-2661 ◽  
Biomolecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Kilic ◽  
Abdulsamet Erden ◽  
Yusuf Sener ◽  
Berkan Armagan ◽  
Alper Sari ◽  
...  

Secondary amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis is a late and serious complication of poorly controlled, chronic inflammatory diseases. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with poorly controlled, longstanding disease and those with extra-articular manifestations are under risk for the development of AA amyloidosis. Although new drugs have proven to be significantly effective in the treatment of secondary AA amyloidosis, no treatment modality has proven to be ideal. To date, only in small case series preliminary clinical improvement have been shown with rituximab therapy for AA amyloidosis secondary to RA that is refractory to TNF-α inhibitors (TNF-i) therapy. In these case series, we assessed the efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy for patients with RA and secondary amyloidosis. Hacettepe University Biologic Registry was developed at 2005. The data of the RA patients who were prescribed a biological drug were recorded regularly. Patients with biopsy proven AA amyloidosis patients were screened. Of 1022 RA patients under biologic therapy, 0.7% patients had clinically apparent histologically confirmed amyloidosis. Four of seven patients who were prescribed rituximab at least one infusion enrolled to those case series. Two of four patients showed significant clinical improvement and one of them also had decrease in proteinuria and the other one had stable renal function and proteinuria. The main goal for the treatment of AA amyloidosis is to control the activity of the underlying disorder. In this study, we showed that rituximab may be an effective treatment in RA patients with amyloidosis who were unresponsive to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or TNFi.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 2095-2104 ◽  
Author(s):  
JACOB KARSH ◽  
EDWARD C. KEYSTONE ◽  
BOULOS HARAOUI ◽  
J. CARTER THORNE ◽  
JANET E. POPE ◽  
...  

Objective.Current clinical trial designs for pharmacologic interventions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not reflect the innovations in RA diagnosis, treatment, and care in countries where new drugs are most often used. The objective of this project was to recommend revised entry criteria and other study design features for RA clinical trials.Methods.Recommendations were developed using a modified nominal group consensus method. Canadian Rheumatology Research Consortium (CRRC) members were polled to rank the greatest challenges to clinical trial recruitment in their practices. Initial recommendations were developed by an expert panel of rheumatology trialists and other experts. A scoping study methodology was then used to examine the evidence available to support or refute each initial recommendation. The potential influence of CRRC recommendations on primary outcomes in future trials was examined. Recommendations were finalized using a consensus process.Results.Recommendations for clinical trial inclusion criteria addressed measures of disease activity [Disease Activity Score 28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) > 3.2 PLUS ≥ 3 tender joints using 28-joint count (TJC28) PLUS ≥ 3 swollen joint (SJC28) OR C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR > upper limit of normal PLUS ≥ 3 TJC28 PLUS ≥ 3 SJC28], functional classification, disease classification and duration, and concomitant RA treatments. Additional recommendations regarding study design addressed rescue strategies and longterm extension.Conclusion.There is an urgent need to modify clinical trial inclusion criteria and other study design features to better reflect the current characteristics of people living with RA in the countries where the new drugs will be used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-161
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Hussar ◽  
Laura A. Finn

Five new drugs for medical problems often affecting older people and marketed in the United States in 2019 have been considered in this review. The uses and most important properties of these agents are discussed, and a rating for each new drug is determined using the New Drug Comparison Rating system developed by the author (DAH). Advantages, disadvantages, and other important information regarding each new drug are identified and used as the basis for determining the rating. The drugs considered include new agents indicated for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, and chronic idiopathic constipation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1268-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
Sabine Collaud Basset ◽  
Maarten Boers ◽  
Ferdinand Breedveld ◽  
Christopher J Edwards ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund V. Capparelli ◽  
Robin Bricker-Ford ◽  
M. John Rogers ◽  
James H. McKerrow ◽  
Sharon L. Reed

ABSTRACT Under an NIH priority to identify new drugs to treat class B parasitic agents, we performed high-throughput screens, which identified the activity of auranofin (Ridaura) against Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia intestinalis, major causes of water- and foodborne outbreaks. Auranofin, an orally administered, gold (Au)-containing compound that was approved by the FDA in 1985 for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, was effective in vitro and in vivo against E. histolytica and both metronidazole-sensitive and -resistant strains of Giardia. We now report the results of an NIH-sponsored phase I trial to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of auranofin in healthy volunteers using modern techniques to measure gold levels. Subjects received orally 6 mg (p.o.) of auranofin daily, the recommended dose for rheumatoid arthritis, for 7 days and were followed for 126 days. Treatment-associated adverse events were reported by 47% of the subjects, but all were mild and resolved without treatment. The mean gold maximum concentration in plasma (C max) at day 7 was 0.312 μg/ml and the half-life (t 1/2) 35 days, so steady-state blood levels would not be reached in short-term therapy. The highest concentration of gold, 13 μM (auranofin equivalent), or more than 25× the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for E. histolytica and 4× that for Giardia, was in feces at 7 days. Modeling of higher doses (9 and 21 mg/day) was performed for systemic parasitic infections, and plasma gold levels of 0.4 to 1.0 μg/ml were reached after 14 days of treatment at 21 mg/day. This phase I trial supports the idea of the safety of auranofin and provides important PK data to support its potential use as a broad-spectrum antiparasitic drug. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02089048.)


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-161
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Hussar ◽  
Laura A. Finn

Five new drugs for medical problems often affecting older people and marketed in the United States in 2019 have been considered in this review. The uses and most important properties of these agents are discussed, and a rating for each new drug is determined using the New Drug Comparison Rating system developed by the author (DAH). Advantages, disadvantages, and other important information regarding each new drug are identified and used as the basis for determining the rating. The drugs considered include new agents indicated for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, and chronic idiopathic constipation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
A. N. Kovshik ◽  
E. P. Kiseleva ◽  
N. G. Klyukvina ◽  
G. V. Lukina

Drug-induced lupus syndrome (DLS) is a rare adverse event with a variety of drugs. More than a hundred of drugs are known that can cause the development of DLS, and this list is growing as new drugs appear. Physicians of any specialty can face such complications of therapy and should be aware of this pathology. The article presents an analysis of a clinical case of DLS development against the background of long-term administration of sulfasalazine in a patient with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as a literature review, which includes data on the prevalence, drug groups, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of this pathology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document