Fracture‐Process Zone for Mixed‐Mode Loading of Concrete

1990 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 1560-1579 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Liaw ◽  
F. L. Jeang ◽  
N. M. Hawkins ◽  
A. S. Kobayashi
Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3203
Author(s):  
Guodong Li ◽  
Zhengyi Ren ◽  
Jiangjiang Yu

The size of the fracture process zone (FPZ) has significance for studying the fracture mechanism and fracture characteristics of concrete. This paper presents the method of assessing the FPZ of Mixed-Mode I-II for quasi-static four-point shearing concrete beams with pre-notched by Lagrangian strain profiles from digital image correlation (DIC). Additionally, it explores the influences of volume rates of the coarse aggregate of 0%, 28%, 48%, and 68%, and the specific surface areas of 0.12 m2/kg, 0.15 m2/kg, and 0.26 m2/kg on the size of the FPZ. It shows that the size of FPZ in four-point shearing concrete beam can be characterized by the displacement field and strain field using DIC. The size of FPZ conforms to linear positive correlation with the volume rate of coarse aggregate, and linear negative correlation with the specific surface area of coarse aggregate. It presents that the crack initiation of the four-point shearing beam with the pre notch is dominated by mode I load, and the propagation and fracture of Mixed-Mode I-II cracks are caused by the combined effect of Mode I and Mode II loading.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1417-1445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingnan Wang ◽  
Hieu T. Tran ◽  
Giang D. Nguyen ◽  
Pathegama G. Ranjith ◽  
Ha H. Bui

2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Shet ◽  
N. Chandra

Cohesive Zone Models (CZMs) are being increasingly used to simulate fracture and fragmentation processes in metallic, polymeric, and ceramic materials and their composites. Instead of an infinitely sharp crack envisaged in fracture mechanics, CZM presupposes the presence of a fracture process zone where the energy is transferred from external work both in the forward and the wake regions of the propagating crack. In this paper, we examine how the external work flows as recoverable elastic strain energy, inelastic strain energy, and cohesive energy, the latter encompassing the work of fracture and other energy consuming mechanisms within the fracture process zone. It is clearly shown that the plastic energy in the material surrounding the crack is not accounted in the cohesive energy. Thus cohesive zone energy encompasses all the inelastic energy e.g., energy required for grainbridging, cavitation, internal sliding, surface energy but excludes any form of inelastic strain energy in the bounding material.


1998 ◽  
Vol 539 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kettunen ◽  
K. J. Niskanen

AbstractWe follow the accumulation of microscopic damage ahead the crack tip in paper. The fiber debonding process varies even within each specimen because of large variation in fiber and bond properties. In general, stiff and weakly bonded fibers tend to debond as a rigid body while ductile or well bonded fibers pull out gradually in a process that propagates from the crack line to the fiber ends. Particularly in the latter case the network ruptures coherently rather than through debonding of single fibers. Experimental analysis and simulations show that fracture energy correlates closely with the size of the fracture process zone (FPZ) irrespective the nature of the debonding process. Only the cases of low bonding and stiff fibers seem to make an exception in that FPZ can grow in size without a corresponding increase in fracture energy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document