Supplier Selection of End-of-Life Vehicles in Reverse Logistics with Extended Producer Responsibility

ICLEM 2010 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuanying He ◽  
Tianshan Ma
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Reverse Logistics ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Extended Producer Responsibility ◽  
Producer Responsibility ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals Enabling Reuse in Extended Producer Responsibility Schemes for White Goods: Legal and Organisational Conditions for Connecting Resource Flows and Actors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Dalhammar ◽  
Emelie Wihlborg ◽  
Leonidas Milios ◽  
Jessika Luth Richter ◽  
Sahra Svensson-Höglund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Energy Recovery ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Empirical Investigation ◽  
Extended Producer Responsibility ◽  
Waste Streams ◽  
Pilot Projects ◽  
Waste Hierarchy ◽  
Producer Responsibility ◽  
White Goods

AbstractExtended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes have proliferated across Europe and other parts of the world in recent years and have contributed to increasing material and energy recovery from waste streams. Currently, EPR schemes do not provide sufficient incentives for moving towards the higher levels of the waste hierarchy, e.g. by reducing the amounts of waste through incentivising the design of products with longer lifespans and by enhancing reuse activities through easier collection and repair of end-of-life products. Nevertheless, several municipalities and regional actors around Europe are increasingly promoting reuse activities through a variety of initiatives. Furthermore, even in the absence of legal drivers, many producer responsibility organisations (PROs), who execute their members’ responsibilities in EPR schemes, are considering promoting reuse and have initiated a number of pilot projects. A product group that has been identified as having high commercial potential for reuse is white goods, but the development of large-scale reuse of white goods seems unlikely unless a series of legal and organisational barriers are effectively addressed. Through an empirical investigation with relevant stakeholders, based on interviews, and the analysis of two case studies of PROs that developed criteria for allowing reusers to access their end-of-life white goods, this contribution presents insights on drivers and barriers for the repair and reuse of white goods in EPR schemes and discusses potential interventions that could facilitate the upscale of reuse activities. Concluding, although the reuse potential for white goods is high, the analysis highlights the currently insufficient policy landscape for incentivising reuse and the need for additional interventions to make reuse feasible as a mainstream enterprise.

scholarly journals Research on the tax support policy for implementing the Extended Producer Responsibility – Taking End-of-Life Vehicle Collecting and Dismantling Enterprises as an Example

2021 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 02013
Author(s):  
Lulu Huo ◽  
Jia Wang ◽  
Yonghe Huang ◽  
Yuke Li ◽  
Wei Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Conservation ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Tax Incentives ◽  
Extended Producer Responsibility ◽  
Producer Responsibility ◽  
Support Policy ◽  
Resource Reuse ◽  
Important System

The Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is an important system for improving resource reuse rate and reducing waste pollution to the environment. Aiming at automobile products, this article takes end of-life vehicles collecting and dismantling enterprises as an example. By studying the support from tax support policy, tax incentives are provided to those enterprises that meet safety and environmental protection requirements. In this way, it can guide enterprises to improve safety and environmental protection and reduce corporate pressure from taxation. This article also predicts the effect of energy conservation and environmental protection after the implementation of tax support policy and demonstrates the importance of tax support policy of implementing the EPR.

Research on Reverse Logistics Mode and Implementation of EPR

2012 ◽  
Vol 253-255 ◽  
pp. 1032-1035
Author(s):  
Ying Wang
Keyword(s):  
Product Design ◽  
Reverse Logistics ◽  
Resource Recovery ◽  
Policy Tools ◽  
Extended Producer Responsibility ◽  
Sustainable Product Design ◽  
Producer Responsibility ◽  
Logistics Mode ◽  
Sustainable Product

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a suite of policy tools for reducing the generation of wastes by promoting greater recycling and resource recovery and encouraging more sustainable product design. The concept of EPR and purpose is proposed. Three recovery modes and characteristics of the EPR are analyzed and corresponding implementation measurements are proposed.

Stakeholder Views on Extended Producer Responsibility and the Circular Economy

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Kunz ◽  
Kieren Mayers ◽  
Luk N. Van Wassenhove
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Circular Economy ◽  
Extended Producer Responsibility ◽  
Stakeholder Views ◽  
Packaging Waste ◽  
Producer Responsibility

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations require that producers organize and pay for treatment and recycling of waste arising from their products at end of life. EPR has been effective in implementing some aspects of circular economy. In Europe, 35% of e-waste and 65% of packaging waste have already been recycled (or reused in some cases). This article analyzes the challenges of implementing EPR and provides useful insights for what has worked well and what challenges remain. Identifying and addressing these challenges will be crucial for framing legislation that will move industry and society toward a more circular economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document