Parking Demand Forecasting Model Based on Principal Component Analysis and BP Neural Network

ICCTP 2011 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Bai ◽  
Xiao-xue Liu ◽  
Yang-dong Zhao ◽  
Chun-hua Song
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Bp Neural Network ◽  
Demand Forecasting ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Forecasting Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Demand Forecasting Model ◽  
Parking Demand

Logistics demand forecasting model based on improved neural network algorithm

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Hongjiang Ma ◽  
Xu Luo
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Influencing Factor ◽  
Demand Forecasting ◽  
Forecasting Model ◽  
Logistics System ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Network Algorithm ◽  
Neural Network Algorithm ◽  
Demand Forecasting Model ◽  
Logistics Demand

The irrationality between the procurement and distribution of the logistics system increases unnecessary circulation links and greatly reduces logistics efficiency, which not only causes a waste of transportation resources, but also increases logistics costs. In order to improve the operation efficiency of the logistics system, based on the improved neural network algorithm, this paper combines the logistic regression algorithm to construct a logistics demand forecasting model based on the improved neural network algorithm. Moreover, according to the characteristics of the complexity of the data in the data mining task itself, this article optimizes the ladder network structure, and combines its supervisory decision-making part with the shallow network to make the model more suitable for logistics demand forecasting. In addition, this paper analyzes the performance of the model based on examples and uses the grey relational analysis method to give the degree of correlation between each influencing factor and logistics demand. The research results show that the model constructed in this paper is reasonable and can be analyzed from a practical perspective.

Long-term runoff forecast using BP neural network based on climatic factors and mutual information method in the Qujiang Catchment of China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huihui Dai
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Mutual Information ◽  
Bp Neural Network ◽  
Climatic Factors ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Information Method ◽  
Runoff Forecast

<p>The formation of runoff is extremely complicated, and it is not good enough to forecast the future runoff only by using the previous runoff or meteorological data. In order to improve the forecast precision of the medium and long-term runoff forecast model, a set of forecast factor group is selected from meteorological factors, such as rainfall, temperature, air pressure and the circulation factors released by the National Meteorological Center  using the method of mutual information and principal component analysis respectively. Results of the forecast in the Qujiang Catchment suggest the climatic factor-based BP neural network hydrological forecasting model has a better forecasting effect using the mutual information method than using the principal component analysis method.</p>

scholarly journals Model Building for Regional Ecological Risk Prediction and Evaluation of Prediction Accuracy

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jia Shao ◽  
Bei-lan Li ◽  
Wei-jun Liu ◽  
Min Chen
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Ecological Risk ◽  
Bp Neural Network ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Risk Level

The regional ecological risk model is built to predict the regional ecological risk level more accurately by using principal component analysis and optimizing standard BP neural network. Taking Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture as an example, twelve primary factors affecting regional risk are selected. The sample data are processed by principal component analysis. The obtained main components are then used as input factors of the improved BP neural network, and the level of ecological risk is used as output factor. The results indicate that the error between the expected output and the actual output is 4.36% in 2016, 1.08% in 2017, and 5.18% in 2018, respectively, with all controlled within 6%. Compared with the prediction accuracy made by standard BP neural network without principal component analysis, the prediction accuracy made by improved BP neural network with principal component analysis is greatly improved. This comprehensive prediction model provides a better evaluation method for prediction of ecological risk level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document