Thermal and Hydraulic Properties of Sandy Soils during Drying and Wetting Cycles

Author(s):  
Alexis Ali ◽  
Mostafa Mohamed ◽  
Mohamed Abdel Aal ◽  
Alma Schellart ◽  
Simon Tait
1999 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tarchitzky ◽  
Y. Golobati ◽  
Y. Chen ◽  
R. Keren

2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1998-2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Buczko ◽  
O. Bens ◽  
R. F. Hüttl

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ofir Katz ◽  
Yair Herooty ◽  
Pua Bar (Kutiel) ◽  
Hezi Yizhaq

<p>In semi-arid and arid environments, clonal plants occasionally appear in ring patterns with a barren soil centre. There is a general agreement that this pattern forms when ramets grow radially, leaving a dead centre where the parent plant once was. Nevertheless, there is still some controversy over the nature of water source-sink relations in and around the rings, and the mechanism that drive the ring formation. We studied Asphodelus ramosus rings in two sites with different soil types (sand and loess) but comparable climate, in order to understand whether differences in soil hydraulic properties create different water source-sink relations and mechanisms that drive ring formation. We characterised soil hydraulic properties and dynamics along the rainy season and during the dry season, accompanied by measurements of soil texture and of belowground storage root biomass. We found that the nature of source-sink relations varies with soil type and properties. In sandy soils, water supply to ring perimeters is mainly from their centre. In loessial soils, water supply to ring perimeters is mainly from the surrounding matrix. Consequently, rings are larger in sandy soils than in loessial soils, in each case in order to optimise water source area. Therefore, studying the formation of rings and other vegetation spatial patterns should consider local soil properties and the possibility that similar patterns may emerge through various mechanisms.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waly Faye ◽  
Didier Orange ◽  
Djim Mouhamadou Lamine Diongue ◽  
Frederic Do ◽  
Christophe Jourdan ◽  
...  

<p>The soil hydraulic properties controlling infiltration are dynamic depending on interrelated factors such as soil texture and structure, climate (rainfall intensity), land use, vegetation cover and plant root systems. These physical and biological factors directly influence the size and geometry of the conductive pores, and therefore the bulk density, soil structure and finally water infiltration at surface. In the Sahelian zone, the slightest modification of the physical properties of the soil has severe consequences on the soil properties and thus on hydrological processes. It is therefore essential to improve knowledge on the spatial distribution of the hydraulic behavior of soils for optimization of agricultural uses.</p><p>We used the BEST method (Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer parameters) on a toposequence of the Senegalese groundnut basin (Fatick region) in the Faidherbia-Flux observatory[1] where the average rainfall is 590 mm/yr. The studied toposequence (400 m long) is representative of a common agroforestry zone with annual cultivation of millet and peanuts and a sparse density of Faidherbia albida. The slope is low (1%) with small lowland areas made up of sandy soil with more clay (clay soil), while the glacis is represented by more or less compacted sand. The infiltrometry measurements were made with the automatic single-ring infiltrometer developed by Di Prima et al. (2016), used here for the first time in West Africa. The explicative variables tested are the type of soils, including: clay soils under tree (CLUT) and outside tree (CLOT), sandy soils under tree (SSUT) and outside trees (SSOT), and cattle trampled soils outside trees (TSOT) particularly compacted and largely present in the study area. BEST algorithms were applied to the experimental data to determine the hydraulic properties of the soils of the different variables and to draw water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves.</p><p>There are significant differences in infiltration rates between the sampled zones and in relation with the studied factors. The highest infiltration rate is found on sandy soils under tree (SSUT) with an average infiltration rate of 14.0 mm/min, followed by SSOT with 11.6 mm/min. Then the clay soils CLUT and CLOT are characterized by similar lower hydraulic responses with average infiltration rates of 6.9 mm/min and 6.2 mm/min, respectively. The average infiltration rate is the lowest on the compacted sandy soils TSOT, with only 5.4 mm/min. The study of the variability of the infiltration rates measured by class of variable shows a large variability for CLOT, CLUT and SSUT (decreasing order of variability). These results are in agreement with the measured values of dry soil bulk density. The high infiltration rates in the clay soils outside and under trees can be explained by the higher content of organic matter observed on the sampling, and probably by the existence of preferential flow activated by the macropores particularly present on clay soils (CLOT and CLUT) and on sandy soils under tree (SSUT).</p><p>Di Prima, S., et al., 2016. Testing a new automated single ring infiltrometer for Beerkan infiltration experiments. Geoderma, 262, 20–34. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.006</p><div> <div> <p>[1] Faidherbia-Flux : https://lped.info/wikiObsSN/?Faidherbia-Flux</p> </div> </div><p> </p>


Geoderma ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 141 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 407-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Manyame ◽  
C.L. Morgan ◽  
J.L. Heilman ◽  
D. Fatondji ◽  
B. Gerard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document