Transient Seepage Analysis of Guri Dam

1979 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-147
Author(s):  
Chi-Yuan Wei ◽  
William Y.J. Shieh
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Haibin Xue ◽  
Faning Dang ◽  
Yanlong Li ◽  
Xiaotao Yin ◽  
Man Lei

The stability analysis of loess slopes with a rising groundwater level is a problem that integrates unsaturated and transient seepage, stress analysis, and stability prediction. For this purpose, a sequentially coupled method of seepage-softening-stability was used. First, seepage analysis of a loess slope with a rising groundwater level was conducted according to unsaturated and transient seepage analysis theory. Second, the spatial distribution of the deformation and strength parameters of the soil, both of which were based on the calculated results of the seepage analysis, were adjusted according to the water-induced structural deterioration equation. Third, the vector sum analysis method of loess slope stability, which was based on the temporal-spatial distribution laws of effective unit weight, elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, cohesion, internal friction angle, and seepage force, was performed by the body force method. To verify the proposed method, the limit equilibrium method of loess slope stability was conducted by the surface force method. Finally, the progressive failure process of a loess slope with a rising groundwater level on the White Deer Plain was presented as an example. A comparison analysis of the calculated results of the two methods revealed that the proposed method was reasonable and reliable.


2017 ◽  
Vol 143 (2) ◽  
pp. 04016093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Stark ◽  
Navid H. Jafari ◽  
J. Sebastian Lopez Zhindon ◽  
Ahmed Baghdady

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tamer Ayvaz ◽  
Mustafa Tuncan ◽  
Halil Karahan ◽  
Ahmet Tuncan

2021 ◽  
Vol 826 (1) ◽  
pp. 012026
Author(s):  
Janming Wu ◽  
Guo Li ◽  
Yaosheng Tan ◽  
Chunfeng Liu ◽  
Lei Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arch Dam ◽  

Author(s):  
Xiaojie Yang ◽  
Weiran Zhang ◽  
Dongjie Xue ◽  
Zhigang Tao ◽  
Sida Xi

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1131
Author(s):  
Soonkie Nam ◽  
Marte Gutierrez ◽  
Panayiotis Diplas ◽  
John Petrie

This paper critically compares the use of laboratory tests against in situ tests combined with numerical seepage modeling to determine the hydraulic conductivity of natural soil deposits. Laboratory determination of hydraulic conductivity used the constant head permeability and oedometer tests on undisturbed Shelby tube and block soil samples. The auger hole method and Guelph permeameter tests were performed in the field. Groundwater table elevations in natural soil deposits with different hydraulic conductivity values were predicted using finite element seepage modeling and compared with field measurements to assess the various test results. Hydraulic conductivity values obtained by the auger hole method provide predictions that best match the groundwater table’s observed location at the field site. This observation indicates that hydraulic conductivity determined by the in situ test represents the actual conditions in the field better than that determined in a laboratory setting. The differences between the laboratory and in situ hydraulic conductivity values can be attributed to factors such as sample disturbance, soil anisotropy, fissures and cracks, and soil structure in addition to the conceptual and procedural differences in testing methods and effects of sample size.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document