PIN photodiode‐based miniature gamma radiation detector for multiple applications including positron emission tomography radioisotopes

1994 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 861-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin J. McKinney
Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 869
Author(s):  
Siwei Xie ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Yibin Zhang ◽  
Gaoyang Ying ◽  
Qiu Huang ◽  
...  

The performance of radiation detectors used in positron-emission tomography (PET) is determined by the intrinsic properties of the scintillators, the geometry and surface treatment of the scintillator crystals and the electrical and optical characteristics of the photosensors. Experimental studies were performed to assess the timing resolution and energy resolution of detectors constructed with samples of different scintillator materials (LaBr3, CeBr3, LFS, LSO, LYSO: Ce, Ca and GAGG) that were fabricated into different shapes with various surface treatments. The saturation correction of SiPMs was applied for tested detectors based on a Tracepro simulation. Overall, we tested 28 pairs of different forms of scintillators to determine the one with the best CTR and light output. Two common high-performance silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) provided by SensL (J-series, 6 mm) or AdvanSiD (NUV, 6 mm) were used for photodetectors. The PET detector constructed with 6 mm CeBr3 cubes achieved the best CTR with a FWHM of 74 ps. The 4 mm co-doped LYSO: Ce, Ca pyramid crystals achieved 88.1 ps FWHM CTR. The 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm 0.2% Ce, 0.1% Ca co-doped LYSO cubes achieved 95.6 ps, 106 ps and 129 ps FWHM CTR, respectively. The scintillator crystals with unpolished surfaces had better timing than those with polished surfaces. The timing resolution was also improved by using certain geometric factors, such as a pyramid shape, to improve light transportation in the scintillator crystals.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertha K. Madras ◽  
◽  
David R. Elmaleh ◽  
Peter C. Meltzer ◽  
Anna Y. Liung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document