Efficient time-dependent density functional theory approximations for hybrid density functionals: Analytical gradients and parallelization

2011 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 054116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taras Petrenko ◽  
Simone Kossmann ◽  
Frank Neese

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cervantes-Navarro ◽  
Daniel Glossman-Mitnik

The Minnesota family of density functionals (M05, M05-2X, M06, M06L, M06-2X, and M06-HF) were evaluated for the calculation of the UV-Vis spectra of the indigo molecule in solvents of different polarities using time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) and the polarized continuum model (PCM). The maximum absorption wavelengths predicted for each functional were compared with the known experimental results.



2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (31) ◽  
pp. 20955-20975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arseny Kovyrshin ◽  
Johannes Neugebauer

Analytical excitation-energy gradients from frozen-density embedding–time-dependent density functional theory are derived and implemented, which are important for photochemistry in complex systems.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Batra ◽  
Stefan Zahn ◽  
Thomas Heine

<p>We thoroughly benchmark time-dependent density- functional theory for the predictive calculation of UV/Vis spectra of porphyrin derivatives. With the aim to provide an approach that is computationally feasible for large-scale applications such as biological systems or molecular framework materials, albeit performing with high accuracy for the Q-bands, we compare the results given by various computational protocols, including basis sets, density-functionals (including gradient corrected local functionals, hybrids, double hybrids and range-separated functionals), and various variants of time-dependent density-functional theory, including the simplified Tamm-Dancoff approximation. An excellent choice for these calculations is the range-separated functional CAM-B3LYP in combination with the simplified Tamm-Dancoff approximation and a basis set of double-ζ quality def2-SVP (mean absolute error [MAE] of ~0.05 eV). This is not surpassed by more expensive approaches, not even by double hybrid functionals, and solely systematic excitation energy scaling slightly improves the results (MAE ~0.04 eV). </p>



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document