Two‐photon excitation of the D 1Δ–X 1Σ+ transition in carbon monoxide

1983 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 3623-3624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carter Kittrell ◽  
Stewart Cameron ◽  
Laurie Butler ◽  
R. W. Field ◽  
R. F. Barrow
2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-644
Author(s):  
Olivier Carrivain ◽  
Mikael Orain ◽  
Nelly Dorval ◽  
Céline Morin ◽  
Guillaume Legros

In this study, quantitative model of two-photon excitation and fluorescence spectra of carbon monoxide based on up-to-date spectroscopic constants collected during an extensive literature survey was developed. This semi-classical model takes into account Hönl–London factors, quenching effects (collisional broadening and shift), ionization and stark effect (broadening and shift), whereas predissociation is neglected. It was specifically developed to first reproduce with a high confidence level the behavior of our experimental spectra obtained from laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) measurements, and then to allow us to extrapolate the fluorescence signal amplitude in other conditions than those used in these experiments. Synthetic two-photon excitation and fluorescence spectra of CO were calculated to predict the fluorescence signal at high pressures and temperatures, which are representative of gas turbine operating conditions. Comparison between experimental and calculated spectra is presented. Influence of temperature on both excitation and fluorescence spectra shapes and amplitudes is well reproduced by the simulated ones. It is then possible to estimate flame temperature from the comparison between experimental and calculated shapes of numerical excitation spectra. Influence of pressure on both excitation and fluorescence spectra was also investigated. Results show that for temperature below 600 K and pressure above 0.1 MPa, the usual Voigt profile is not suitable to reproduce the shape of the excitation spectrum. We found that the Lindholm profile is well suited to reproduce the pressure-dependence of the spectrum in the range 0.1 to 0.5 MPa at 300 K, and 0.1 to 0.7 MPa at 860 K. Beyond 0.7 MPa, in this temperature range, it is shown that the Lindholm profile does no longer match the spectral profiles, in particularly the red wing. Further analyses taking into account the line mixing phenomenon at higher pressure are thus discussed.


Author(s):  
David W. Piston ◽  
Brian D. Bennett ◽  
Robert G. Summers

Two-photon excitation microscopy (TPEM) provides attractive advantages over confocal microscopy for three-dimensionally resolved fluorescence imaging and photochemistry. Two-photon excitation arises from the simultaneous absorption of two photons in a single quantitized event whose probability is proportional to the square of the instantaneous intensity. For example, two red photons can cause the transition to an excited electronic state normally reached by absorption in the ultraviolet. In practice, two-photon excitation is made possible by the very high local instantaneous intensity provided by a combination of diffraction-limited focusing of a single laser beam in the microscope and the temporal concentration of 100 femtosecond pulses generated by a mode-locked laser. Resultant peak excitation intensities are 106 times greater than the CW intensities used in confocal microscopy, but the pulse duty cycle of 10-5 maintains the average input power on the order of 10 mW, only slightly greater than the power normally used in confocal microscopy.


Author(s):  
David W. Piston

Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy provides attractive advantages over confocal microscopy for three-dimensionally resolved fluorescence imaging. Two-photon excitation arises from the simultaneous absorption of two photons in a single quantitized event whose probability is proportional to the square of the instantaneous intensity. For example, two red photons can cause the transition to an excited electronic state normally reached by absorption in the ultraviolet. In our fluorescence experiments, the final excited state is the same singlet state that is populated during a conventional fluorescence experiment. Thus, the fluorophore exhibits the same emission properties (e.g. wavelength shifts, environmental sensitivity) used in typical biological microscopy studies. In practice, two-photon excitation is made possible by the very high local instantaneous intensity provided by a combination of diffraction-limited focusing of a single laser beam in the microscope and the temporal concentration of 100 femtosecond pulses generated by a mode-locked laser. Resultant peak excitation intensities are 106 times greater than the CW intensities used in confocal microscopy, but the pulse duty cycle of 10−5 maintains the average input power on the order of 10 mW, only slightly greater than the power normally used in confocal microscopy.


Bioimaging ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pekka E Hänninen ◽  
Martin Schrader ◽  
Erkki Soini ◽  
Stefan W Hell

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 305-306
Author(s):  
David W. Piston

Two-photon excitation microscopy (TPEM) provides attractive advantages over confocal microscopy for three-dimensionally resolved fluorescence imaging and photochemistry. It provides three-dimensional resolution and eliminates background equivalent to an ideal confocal microscope without requiring a confocal spatial filter, whose absence enhances fluorescence collection efficiency. This results in inherent submicron optical sectioning by excitation alone. In practice, TPEM is made possible by the very high local instantaneous intensity provided by a combination of diffraction-limited focusing of a single laser beam in the microscope and the temporal concentration of 100 femtosecond pulses generated by a mode-locked laser. Resultant peak excitation intensities are 106 times greater than the CW intensities used in confocal microscopy, but the pulse duty cycle of 10−5 limits the average input power to less than 10 mW, only slightly greater than the power normally used in confocal microscopy. Because of the intensity-squared dependence of the two-photon absorption, the excitation is limited to the focal volume.


2002 ◽  
Vol 106 (36) ◽  
pp. 9418-9423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Zimmermann ◽  
Patricia A. Linden ◽  
Harsha M. Vaswani ◽  
Roger G. Hiller ◽  
Graham R. Fleming

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document