The effect of different dental implant thread profiles on bone stress distribution

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ikman Ishak ◽  
Aisyah Ahmad Shafi ◽  
C. Y. Khor ◽  
W. M. Faizal W. A. Rahim ◽  
M. U. Rosli ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
N. Jayakumar ◽  
G. Senthilkumar ◽  
S. Vigneshwaran ◽  
K.G. Ajay Kumar

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Achour ◽  
A. Merdji ◽  
B. Bachir Bouiadjra ◽  
B. Serier ◽  
N. Djebbar

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi KITAGAWA ◽  
Yasuhiro TANIMOTO ◽  
Kimiya NEMOTO ◽  
Masahiro AIDA

Author(s):  
Majid Ghadiri ◽  
Navvab Shafiei ◽  
Sadegh Hemmati Salekdeh ◽  
Parya Mottaghi ◽  
Tahereh Mirzaie

2014 ◽  
Vol 606 ◽  
pp. 137-140
Author(s):  
Dušan Németh ◽  
Ján Kučera ◽  
František Lofaj ◽  
Vladimír Ivančo

The aim of this work is the modeling of the stress distribution in cortical and trabecular bone of model frontal part of mandible by FEM analysis using linear static methods applying monocortical and bicortical fixation of dental implant. Depending on the position of the screw thread with regard to the bone surface, three different cases were simulated: exactly on the bone surface, 1,5 mm above and 0,5 mm below the surface of the cortical bone. It was found out that the stress field in the cortical part and the implant are considerably lower in the case of slightly recessed position in contrast with the above and normal position of the implant in both, monocortical and bicortical fixations. However, bicortical fixation in this case generates slightly lower stress field in the bone and implant parts than in monocortical fixation. Monocortical fixation is otherwise slightly more favorable from the viewpoint of maximum stresses in the bone in the case of exact and above positions of the implant.


Author(s):  
Denis Romanov ◽  
Kirill Sosnin ◽  
Artem Filyakov ◽  
Sergey Nevskii ◽  
Stanislav Moskovskii

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document