Treatment of an adult patient with severely crowded bimaxillary protrusive Class II malocclusion with atypical extractions

2002 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert I. Schacter ◽  
Warren M. Schacter
Keyword(s):  
Adult Patient ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion

scholarly journals Correction of Class II malocclusion and soft tissue profile in an adult patient

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
Aditi Gaur ◽  
Sandhya Maheshwari ◽  
SanjeevKumar Verma
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Adult Patient ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile

scholarly journals Treatment of a Class II malocclusion with deep overbite in an adult patient using intermaxillary elastics and spee curve controlling with reverse and accentuated archwires

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 672
Author(s):  
PaulaPatrícia Cotrin-Silva ◽  
FabrícioPinelli Valarelli ◽  
Ronaldo Carniel ◽  
MayaraPaim Patel ◽  
RodrigoHermont Cançado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Patient ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion

scholarly journals Assessment and comparision of Gonial angle in panoramic radiograph and lateral cephalogram in adult patient with Class I and Class II malocclusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Harish Atram ◽  
Kalyani Chaudhari ◽  
Pankaj Akhare ◽  
Kshitij Sabley ◽  
Akanksha Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Patient ◽  
Panoramic Radiograph ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Lateral Cephalogram ◽  
Gonial Angle

Multidisciplinary Approach for an Adult Patient with Skeletal Class II, Multiple Teeth Missing and Constricted Maxilla

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Seung-Weon Lim ◽  
Ha-Yeon Park ◽  
Won-Young Park ◽  
Min-Hee Oh ◽  
Kyung-Min Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Patient ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

Soft-tissue changes after Class II malocclusion treatment using the Sander bite-jumping appliance: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Tepedino ◽  
Maria V. Della Noce ◽  
Domenico Ciavarella ◽  
Patrizia Gallenzi ◽  
Massimo Cordaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Tissue Changes ◽  
Soft Tissue Changes

Uso de propulsor mandibular fixo Flex Developer como recurso no tratamento da Classe II em paciente não colaborador

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (52) ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
Renato Barcellos Rédua
Keyword(s):  
Upper Airway ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Therapeutic Alternatives ◽  
Smile Aesthetics ◽  
Treatment Alternatives

Class II malocclusion has a high incidence in the population, which may compromise smile aesthetics, occlusion function and stability. Skeletal Class II may affect facial aesthetics and upper airway volume. Class II malocclusion is routinely associated with skeletal Class II condition, having as treatment alternatives the use of Extra Buccal Appliance (EBA) or removable or fixed propulsor appliance. This article describes a case of a patient who did not accept the use of EBA and so it was fitted a Flex Developer propulsor for Class II correction and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of therapeutic alternatives for Class II correction.

Functional Appliances in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion- A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash Shah ◽  
Purvesh Shah ◽  
Santosh Goje ◽  
Romil Shah ◽  
Bhumi Modi
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliances

Comparative Dentoskeletal Study of Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Subjects

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
Jyoti Dhakal
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Basic Difference ◽  
Cephalometric Radiograph ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Dentoskeletal Morphology ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Dental Cast ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The dentoskeletal characteristics of Class II malocclusion subjects were evaluated using cephalometric radiograph and dental cast of 60 untreated patients. The sample included 30 Class II Division 1 and 30 Class II Division 2 malocclusion patients. The inter-canine, inter-premolar, inter-molar, inter-canine alveolar, inter-premolar alveolar, inter-molar alveolar widths are measured on study models. The result showed statistically significant difference between the groups for mandibular inter-canine width only. The cephalometric analysis revealed that SNB angle was responsible for the skeletal sagittal difference between the two groups except for the position of maxillary incisors. No basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology existed between Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 malocclusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document