scholarly journals Thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery in patients aged 79 years or older

2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tam T.T. Huynh ◽  
Charles C. Miller ◽  
Anthony L. Estrera ◽  
Eyal E. Porat ◽  
Hazim J. Safi
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e052070
Author(s):  
Ming Hao Guo ◽  
Jehangir J Appoo ◽  
George A Wells ◽  
Michael Chu ◽  
Maral Ouzounian ◽  
...  

IntroductionAscending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) is an asymptomatic condition that can lead to catastrophic events of rupture or dissection. Current guidelines are based on limited retrospective data and recommend surgical intervention for ATAA with a diameter of greater or equal to 5.5 cm. Treatment in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Surgery versus Surveillance is the first prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial that compares outcomes of patients undergoing early elective ascending aortic surgery to patients undergoing medical surveillance.Methods and analysisPatients between the ages of 18 and 80 with an asymptomatic ATAA between 5.0 cm and 5.4 cm in diameter are eligible for randomisation to early surgery or surveillance. Patients in the surgery group will be followed at 1 month after discharge, then annually for a minimum of 2 years and up to 5 years. Patients in the surveillance group will be followed annually from their index clinic visit for a minimum of 2 years and up to 5 years. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at follow-up. A sample size of 618 subjects (309 in each group) will achieve an 80% power at a 0.047 significance level.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board approval (Protocol 20180007-01H), which was most recently updated on 25 November 2020. The Research Ethics Board have granted approval to the study at 14 participating institutions, including the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board. On completion of data analysis, the result of the trial will be presented at national and international conferences, and published in relevant journals, regardless of the finding of the trial.Trial registration numberNCT03536312.


2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 1219-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamdy Awad ◽  
Mohamed Ehab Ramadan ◽  
Esmerina Tili ◽  
Kathryn Hackett ◽  
Eric C. Bourekas

2010 ◽  
Vol 210 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo M. Gazoni ◽  
Alan M. Speir ◽  
Irving L. Kron ◽  
Edward Fonner ◽  
Ivan K. Crosby

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prity Gupta ◽  
Amer Harky ◽  
Saleem Jahangeer ◽  
Benjamin Adams ◽  
Mohamad Bashir

Cardiovascular surgeons have long debated the safe duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery. The rationale for using adjunctive cerebral perfusion (or not) is to achieve the best technical aortic repair with the lowest risk of morbidity and death. In this literature review, we highlight the debates surrounding these issues, evaluate the disparate findings on deep hypothermic circulatory arrest durations and temperatures, and consider the usefulness of adjunctive perfusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document