83 EFFECTS OF HUMAN INTERFERON-α ON GENE EXPRESSION IN THE BOVINE ENDOMETRIUM IN COMPARISON TO DAYS 15 AND 18 OF PREGNANCY

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
S. Bauersachs ◽  
S. E. Ulbrich ◽  
H. D. Reichenbach ◽  
M. Reichenbach ◽  
M. Büttner ◽  
...  

Interferon-τ (IFNT), a Type-I interferon (IFN), is the pregnancy recognition signal produced by the ruminant conceptus (Godkin et al. 1984; Hansen et al. 1985; Helmer et al. 1987; Spencer et al. 2007). In addition to these specific functions of IFNT in ruminants, many studies suggest that IFNs play a general role in establishment of pregnancy and conceptus attachment/implantation in most mammalian species (Bazer et al. 2009; Bazer et al. 2010; Johnson et al. 2009; Roberts et al. 2008). To characterise the effects of prototype Type-I IFNs on bovine endometrium, in experiment one, Simmental heifers were treated from Day 14 to Day 16 of the oestrous cycle with a rod-shaped intrauterine device releasing human interferon-α (IFNA) or placebo lipid extrudates or PBS only as controls (n = 4 each). Lipid formulation and concentration of human IFNA were adjusted to release 8–9 × 107 IU of IFNA over a period of 2 days in in vitro release experiments. On Day 16, endometrial biopsy samples were collected after flushing the uterus. In experiment 2, endometrial tissue samples were obtained on Day 12, 15 and 18 post-mating from nonpregnant or pregnant heifers. All samples from both experiments were analysed with an Affymetrix Bovine Genome Array (Santa Clara, CA). In experiment one, IFNA treatment resulted in differential gene expression in the bovine endometrium. Significant differences were found between the IFNA group and both control groups, whereas no differences were observed between the placebo and the PBS control group. In experiment 2, differentially expressed genes were found between pregnant and nonpregnant endometria on Day 15 and 18, but not on Day 12, with many of them known IFN-stimulated genes. The comparison of the data sets from both experiments showed very similar gene expression changes for most of the typical IFN-stimulated genes. In addition, several genes were identified which were differentially expressed after IFNA treatment but not different at Day 15 or 18 of pregnancy compared with nonpregnant animals. Conversely, some genes were found as differentially expressed during pregnancy but not after IFNA treatment. Differential expression of selected genes was verified by quantitative real-time PCR and 4 genes, namely jumonji C domain containing histone demethylase 1 homologue D (JHDM1D), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), fatty acid binding protein 3, muscle and heart (mammary-derived growth inhibitor) (FABP3) and dickkopf homologue 1 (DKK1), were selected for localization of mRNA expression in endometrial tissue sections. The findings of this study suggest that there may be differential effects of bovine IFNT compared with human IFNA and that some pregnancy-specific changes in the endometrium are elicited by conceptus-derived factors other than IFNT. This study was supported by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF, FUGATO-plus, COMPENDIUM) and the German Research Foundation (DFG FOR478). The authors are part of the European Union COST action GEMINI.

Gene ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn R. Brandt ◽  
Rodney J. Devenish ◽  
Brian F. Cheetham ◽  
Anthony W. Linnane

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1137-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
HEE YOUNG KANG ◽  
EUI-JU HONG ◽  
KYU-CHAN HWANG ◽  
NAM-HYUNG KIM ◽  
WOO-SUK HWANG ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 264 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Llamil Ruiz ◽  
Nuria Reyes ◽  
Ladys Duany ◽  
Abrisleyda Franco ◽  
Kethia Aroche ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansapani Rodrigo ◽  
Bryan Martinez ◽  
Roberto De La Garza ◽  
Upal Roy

Abstract Background: HIV Associated Neurological Disorders (HAND) is relatively common among people with HIV-1 infection, even those taking combined antiretroviral treatment (cART). Genome-wide screening of transcription regulation in brain tissue helps in identifying substantial abnormalities present in patients’ gene transcripts and to discover possible biomarkers for HAND. This study explores the possibility of identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes, which can serve as potential biomarkers to detect HAND. In this study, we have investigated the gene expression levels of three subject groups with different impairment levels of HAND along with a control group in three distinct brain sectors: white matter, frontal cortex, and basal ganglia. Methods: Linear models with weighted least squares along with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple corrections were used to identify DE genes in each brain region. Genes with an adjusted p-value of less than 0.01 were identified as differentially expressed. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed to detect any groupings among the subject groups. Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) and random forests (RF) methods with two distinct approaches were used to identify DE genes. Results: A total of 710 genes in basal ganglia, 794 genes in the frontal cortex, and 1481 genes in white matter were screened. The highest proportion of DE genes was observed within the two brain regions, frontal neocortex, and basal ganglia. PCA analyses do not exhibit clear groupings among four subject groups. SAM and RF models reveal the genes, CIRBP, RBM3, GPNMB, ISG15, IFIT6, IFI6, and IFIT3, to have DE genes in the frontal cortex or basal ganglia among the subject groups. The gene, GADD45A, a protein-coding gene whose transcript levels tend to increase with stressful growth arrest conditions, was consistently ranked among the top genes by both RF models within the frontal cortex. Conclusions: Our study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the gene expression levels of the subject with different severity levels of HAND. Several genes that appear to play critical roles in the inflammatory response have been found, and they have an excellent potential to be used as biomarkers to detect HAND under further investigations.


2000 ◽  
Vol 852 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuhiro Makino ◽  
Yutaka Kitano ◽  
Chika Komiyama ◽  
Masaaki Hirohashi ◽  
Morihiro Kohno ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 262 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peilin Wang ◽  
Shuying Cong ◽  
Xiaoyong Dong ◽  
Zaichun Chen ◽  
Chuiping Ma

Author(s):  
D. NOVICK ◽  
D.G. FISCHER ◽  
Y. CHERNAJOVSKY ◽  
M. REVEL ◽  
M. RUBINSTEIN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document