Parametric uncertainty quantification in the Rothermel model with randomised quasi-Monte Carlo methods

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaning Liu ◽  
Edwin Jimenez ◽  
M. Yousuff Hussaini ◽  
Giray Ökten ◽  
Scott Goodrick

Rothermel's wildland surface fire model is a popular model used in wildland fire management. The original model has a large number of parameters, making uncertainty quantification challenging. In this paper, we use variance-based global sensitivity analysis to reduce the number of model parameters, and apply randomised quasi-Monte Carlo methods to quantify parametric uncertainties for the reduced model. The Monte Carlo estimator used in these calculations is based on a control variate approach applied to the sensitivity derivative enhanced sampling. The chaparral fuel model, selected from Rothermel's 11 original fuel models, is studied as an example. We obtain numerical results that improve the crude Monte Carlo sampling by factors as high as three orders of magnitude.

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Longyan Cai ◽  
Hong S. He ◽  
Yu Liang ◽  
Zhiwei Wu ◽  
Chao Huang

Fire propagation is inevitably affected by fuel-model parameters during wildfire simulations and the uncertainty of the fuel-model parameters makes forecasting accurate fire behaviour very difficult. In this study, three different methods (Morris screening, first-order analysis and the Monte Carlo method) were used to analyse the uncertainty of fuel-model parameters with FARSITE model. The results of the uncertainty analysis showed that only a few fuel-model parameters markedly influenced the uncertainty of the model outputs, and many of the fuel-model parameters had little or no effect. The fire-spread rate is the driving force behind the uncertainty of other fire behaviours. Thus, the highly uncertain fuel-model parameters associated with spread rate should be used cautiously in wildfire simulations. Monte Carlo results indicated that the relationship between model input and output was non-linear and neglecting fuel-model parameter uncertainty of the model would magnify fire behaviours. Additionally, fuel-model parameters have high input uncertainty. Therefore, fuel-model parameters must be calibrated against actual fires. The highly uncertain fuel-model parameters with high spatial-temporal variability consisted of fuel-bed depth, live-shrub loading and 1-h time-lag loading are preferentially chosen as parameters to calibrate several wildfires.


2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (308) ◽  
pp. 2827-2860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Y. Kuo ◽  
Robert Scheichl ◽  
Christoph Schwab ◽  
Ian H. Sloan ◽  
Elisabeth Ullmann

Author(s):  
Georg A. Mensah ◽  
Luca Magri ◽  
Jonas P. Moeck

Thermoacoustic instabilities are a major threat for modern gas turbines. Frequency-domain based stability methods, such as network models and Helmholtz solvers, are common design tools because they are fast compared to compressible CFD computations. Frequency-domain approaches result in an eigenvalue problem, which is nonlinear with respect to the eigenvalue. Nonlinear functions of the frequency are, for example, the n–τ model, impedance boundary conditions, etc. Thus, the influence of the relevant parameters on mode stability is only given implicitly. Small changes in some model parameters, which are obtained by experiments with some uncertainty, may have a great impact on stability. The assessment of how parameter uncertainties propagate to system stability is therefore crucial for safe gas turbine operation. This question is addressed by uncertainty quantification. A common strategy for uncertainty quantification in thermoacoustics is risk factor analysis. It quantifies the uncertainty of a set of parameters in terms of the probability of a mode to become unstable. One general challenge regarding uncertainty quantification is the sheer number of uncertain parameter combinations to be quantified. For instance, uncertain parameters in an annular combustor might be the equivalence ratio, convection times, geometrical parameters, boundary impedances, flame response model parameters etc. Assessing also the influence of all possible combinations of these parameters on the risk factor is a numerically very costly task. A new and fast way to obtain algebraic parameter models in order to tackle the implicit nature of the eigenfrequency problem is using adjoint perturbation theory. Though adjoint perturbation methods were recently applied to accelerate the risk factor analysis, its potential to improve the theory has not yet been fully exploited. This paper aims to further utilize adjoint methods for the quantification of uncertainties. This analytical method avoids the usual random Monte Carlo simulations, making it particularly attractive for industrial purposes. Using network models and the open-source Helmholtz solver PyHoltz it is also discussed how to apply the method with standard modeling techniques. The theory is exemplified based on a simple ducted flame and a combustor of EM2C laboratory for which experimental validation is available.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document