scholarly journals Correction for Han et al., Structural basis for the auxin-induced transcriptional regulation by Aux/IAA17

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. E602-E602
2012 ◽  
Vol 287 (36) ◽  
pp. 30755-30768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitomi Sawai ◽  
Masaru Yamanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Sugimoto ◽  
Yoshitsugu Shiro ◽  
Shigetoshi Aono

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (52) ◽  
pp. 18613-18618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mookyoung Han ◽  
Yangshin Park ◽  
Iktae Kim ◽  
Eun-Hee Kim ◽  
Tae-Kyung Yu ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 350 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raman P. NAGARAJAN ◽  
Yan CHEN

Smad2 and Smad3 are signalling proteins that are involved in mediating the transcriptional regulation of target genes downstream of transforming growth factor-β and activin receptors. Although they are structurally very similar, Smad2 and Smad3 have some functional differences in transducing signals for these receptors. In FAST-2 (forkhead activin signal transducer-2)-mediated transcriptional regulation using the activin-responsive element derived from Xenopus Mix.2 promoter as a reporter, Smad3 but not Smad2 alone was able to stimulate the transcription. In addition, Smad3 was able to inhibit the transactivation of the promoter induced by co-expression of Smad2, Smad4 and an active activin type-I receptor. We used a series of chimaeras between Smad1 and Smad3 and found that the Mad homology 1 (MH1) domain of Smad3 was indispensable for the dual regulatory function of Smad3. However, this Smad3-specific function could not be manifested in Smad2 mutants that were devoid of the two amino acid insertions (at the MH1 domain) that comprise the major structural difference between Smad2 and Smad3, indicating that other structural motifs are involved in determining the regulatory activity of Smad3. By using chimaeras between Smad2 and Smad3, we found that the most N-terminal portion of Smad3 was crucial for its function. Taken together, these results suggest that, as compared with Smad2, the unique function of Smad3 in modulating the FAST-2-mediated transcription is contributed to by a subtle difference in the structural features at the MH1 domain.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1792-1802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D Dunham ◽  
Weijun Xu ◽  
Barbara E Funnell ◽  
Maria A Schumacher

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 1449-1462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Schureck ◽  
Jeffrey Meisner ◽  
Eric D. Hoffer ◽  
Dongxue Wang ◽  
Nina Onuoha ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 381 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzhen Zhou ◽  
John D. Larson ◽  
Christopher A. Bottoms ◽  
Emilia C. Arturo ◽  
Michael T. Henzl ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e1003108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Albanesi ◽  
Georgina Reh ◽  
Marcelo E. Guerin ◽  
Francis Schaeffer ◽  
Michel Debarbouille ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyan Jia ◽  
Kelsey Aadland ◽  
Oralia Kolaczkowski ◽  
Bryan Kolaczkowski

ABSTRACTRNA interference (RNAi) plays important roles in organism development through post-transcriptional regulation of specific target mRNAs. Target specificity is largely controlled by base-pair complementarity between micro-RNA (miRNA) regulatory elements and short regions of the target mRNA. The pattern of miRNA production in a cell interacts with the cell’s mRNA transcriptome to generate a specific network of post-transcriptional regulation that can play critical roles in cellular metabolism, differentiation, tissue/organ development and developmental timing. In plants, miRNA production is orchestrated in the nucleus by a suite of proteins that control transcription of the pri-miRNA gene, post-transcriptional processing and nuclear export of the mature miRNA. In the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, post-transcriptional processing of miRNAs is controlled by a pair of physically-interacting proteins, HYL1 and DCL1. However, the evolutionary history of the HYL1-DCL1 interaction is unknown, as is its structural basis. Here we use ancestral sequence reconstruction and functional characterization of ancestral HYL1 in vitro and in vivo to better understand the origin and evolution of the HYL1-DCL1 interaction and its impact on miRNA production and plant development. We found the ancestral plant HYL1 evolved high affinity for both double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and its DCL1 partner very early in plant evolutionary history, before the divergence of mosses from seed plants (~500 Ma), and these high-affinity interactions remained largely conserved throughout plant evolutionary history. Structural modeling and molecular binding experiments suggest that the second of two double-stranded RNA-binding motifs (DSRMs) in HYL1 may interact tightly with the first of two C-terminal DCL1 DSRMs to mediate the HYL1-DCL1 physical interaction necessary for efficient miRNA production. Transgenic expression of the nearly 200 Ma-old ancestral flowering-plant HYL1 in A. thaliana was sufficient to rescue many key aspects of plant development disrupted by HYL1− knockout and restored near-native miRNA production, suggesting that the functional partnership of HYL1-DCL1 originated very early in and was strongly conserved throughout the evolutionary history of terrestrial plants. Overall, our results are consistent with a model in which miRNA-based gene regulation evolved as part of a conserved plant ‘developmental toolkit’; its role in generating developmental novelty is probably related to the relatively rapid evolution of miRNA genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document