scholarly journals Architectural specificity in chromatin structure at the TATA box in vivo: Nucleosome displacement upon  -phaseolin gene activation

1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 4772-4777 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Li ◽  
S. P. Chandler ◽  
A. P. Wolffe ◽  
T. C. Hall
1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 7455-7465 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Lycan ◽  
G Mikesell ◽  
M Bunger ◽  
L Breeden

Swi4 and Swi6 form a complex which is required for Start-dependent activation of HO and for high-level expression of G1 cyclin genes CLN1 and CLN2. To identify other regulators of this pathway, we screened for dominant, recessive, conditional, and allele-specific suppressors of swi4 mutants. We isolated 16 recessive suppressors that define three genes, SSF1, SSF5, and SSF9 (suppressor of swi four). Mutations in all three genes bypass the requirement for both Swi4 and Swi6 for HO transcription and activate transcription from reporter genes lacking upstream activating sequences (UASs). SSF5 is allelic with SIN4 (TSF3), a gene implicated in global repression of transcription and chromatin structure, and SSF9 is likely to be a new global repressor of transcription. SSF1 is allelic with CDC68 (SPT16). cdc68 mutations have been shown to increase expression from defective promoters, while preventing transcription from other intact promoters, including CLN1 and CLN2. We find that CDC68 is a required activator of both SWI4 and SWI6, suggesting that CDC68's role at the CLN promoters may be indirect. The target of CDC68 within the SWI4 promoter is complex in that known activating elements (MluI cell cycle boxes) in the SWI4 promoter are required for CDC68 dependence but only within the context of the full-length promoter. This result suggests that there may be both a chromatin structure and a UAS-specific component to Cdc68 function at SWI4. We suggest that Cdc68 functions both in the assembly of repressive complexes that form on many intact promoters in vivo and in the relief of this repression during gene activation.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3633-3633
Author(s):  
Louis C. Dore ◽  
Christopher R. Vakoc ◽  
Gerd A. Blobel ◽  
Ross C. Hardison ◽  
David M. Bodine ◽  
...  

Abstract Alpha Hemoglobin Stabilizing Protein (AHSP, Eraf) is an abundant erythroid protein that binds and stabilizes alpha globin and alpha hemoglobin (Hb). In mice, loss of AHSP causes hemolytic anemia, with elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and Hb precipitation in erythrocytes. Loss of AHSP exacerbates beta thalassemia phenotypes in mice, presumably by enhancing the toxicity of excessive free alpha Hb. Based on these findings, AHSP is a candidate modifier gene for beta thalassemia in humans. No mutations in the AHSP coding region have been identified in patients to date. However, several groups reported an inverse correlation between beta thalassemia severity and erythroid AHSP expression levels, raising the possibility that AHSP is a quantitative trait modifier of beta thalassemia. To address this possibility, it is important to define the mechanisms that control expression of the AHSP gene. Transcripts of murine Ahsp are inducible by GATA-1. The goals of the current studies are to investigate the mechanisms of this induction and to define the DNA domain that regulates the locus. Using phylogenetic comparisons, we identified a hotspot for mammalian chromosomal rearrangement just downstream of the Ahsp gene. This hotspot is located at the end of a syntenic block of approximately 350 kb that is conserved in mammals and likely marks the 3′ end of the gene regulatory domain. We focused our initial functional studies on a 7 kb genomic region bounded at the 5′ (centromeric) end of Ahsp by the nearest adjacent gene, an EST expressed in multiple tissues, and at the 3′ (telomeric) end by the rearrangement hotspot. In transient transfection assays, the Ahsp promoter region conferred erythroid-specific expression to a linked reporter gene. In heterologous cells, GATA-1 transactivated the Ahsp promoter in a dose-dependent fashion. To examine GATA-1 binding and its subsequent effects on the Ahsp gene in vivo, we used G1E-ER4 cells, a GATA-1 null erythroblast line that undergoes terminal erythroid maturation after activation of an estradiol-inducible form of GATA-1. We made several findings with regards to the role of GATA-1 in Ahsp gene regulation. First, GATA-1 and its cofactor, Friend of GATA-1 (FOG-1), bind directly to the Ahsp locus at regions that contain conserved GATA consensus motifs and are predicted to be important erythroid regulatory elements by our bioinformatic studies. Second, GATA-1 induces epigenetic changes in chromatin structure that are associated with gene activation, including formation of a DNase I hypersensitive site, hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4, and methylation of histone H3 lysine-4. Together, these findings begin to establish the DNA region and mechanisms that control Ahsp transcription, allowing for further studies to map the cis elements responsible for population variations in gene expression.


1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 7455-7465 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Lycan ◽  
G Mikesell ◽  
M Bunger ◽  
L Breeden

Swi4 and Swi6 form a complex which is required for Start-dependent activation of HO and for high-level expression of G1 cyclin genes CLN1 and CLN2. To identify other regulators of this pathway, we screened for dominant, recessive, conditional, and allele-specific suppressors of swi4 mutants. We isolated 16 recessive suppressors that define three genes, SSF1, SSF5, and SSF9 (suppressor of swi four). Mutations in all three genes bypass the requirement for both Swi4 and Swi6 for HO transcription and activate transcription from reporter genes lacking upstream activating sequences (UASs). SSF5 is allelic with SIN4 (TSF3), a gene implicated in global repression of transcription and chromatin structure, and SSF9 is likely to be a new global repressor of transcription. SSF1 is allelic with CDC68 (SPT16). cdc68 mutations have been shown to increase expression from defective promoters, while preventing transcription from other intact promoters, including CLN1 and CLN2. We find that CDC68 is a required activator of both SWI4 and SWI6, suggesting that CDC68's role at the CLN promoters may be indirect. The target of CDC68 within the SWI4 promoter is complex in that known activating elements (MluI cell cycle boxes) in the SWI4 promoter are required for CDC68 dependence but only within the context of the full-length promoter. This result suggests that there may be both a chromatin structure and a UAS-specific component to Cdc68 function at SWI4. We suggest that Cdc68 functions both in the assembly of repressive complexes that form on many intact promoters in vivo and in the relief of this repression during gene activation.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1978-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Verdone ◽  
G Camilloni ◽  
E Di Mauro ◽  
M Caserta

We have analyzed at both low and high resolution the distribution of nucleosomes over the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 promoter region in its chromosomal location, both under repressing (high-glucose) conditions and during derepression. Enzymatic treatments (micrococcal nuclease and restriction endonucleases) were used to probe the in vivo chromatin structure during ADH2 gene activation. Under glucose-repressed conditions, the ADH2 promoter was bound by a precise array of nucleosomes, the principal ones positioned at the RNA initiation sites (nucleosome +1), at the TATA box (nucleosome -1), and upstream of the ADR1-binding site (UAS1) (nucleosome -2). The UAS1 sequence and the adjacent UAS2 sequence constituted a nucleosome-free region. Nucleosomes -1 and +1 were destabilized soon after depletion of glucose and had become so before the appearance of ADH2 mRNA. When the transcription rate was high, nucleosomes -2 and +2 also underwent rearrangement. When spheroplasts were prepared from cells grown in minimal medium, detection of this chromatin remodeling required the addition of a small amount of glucose. Cells lacking the ADR1 protein did not display any of these chromatin modifications upon glucose depletion. Since the UAS1 sequence to which Adr1p binds is located immediately upstream of nucleosome -1, Adr1p is presumably required for destabilization of this nucleosome and for aiding the TATA-box accessibility to the transcription machinery.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 8099-8109 ◽  
Author(s):  
AeRi Kim ◽  
Ann Dean

ABSTRACT Gene activation requires alteration of chromatin structure to facilitate active transcription complex formation at a gene promoter. Nucleosome remodeling complexes and histone modifying complexes each play unique and interdependent roles in bringing about these changes. The role of distant enhancers in these structural alterations is not well understood. We studied nucleosome remodeling and covalent histone modification mediated by the β-globin locus control region HS2 enhancer at nucleosome-level resolution throughout a 5.5-kb globin gene model locus in vivo in K562 cells. We compared the transcriptionally active locus to one in which HS2 was inactivated by mutations in the core NF-E2 sites. In contrast to inactive templates, nucleosomes were mobilized in discrete areas of the active locus, including the HS2 core and the proximal promoter. Large differences in restriction enzyme accessibility between the active and inactive templates were limited to the regions of nucleosome mobilization, which subsumed the DNase I hypersensitive sites. In contrast to this discrete pattern, histone H3 and H4 acetylation and H3 K4 methylation were elevated across the entire active locus, accompanied by depletion of linker histone H1. The coding region of the gene differed from the regulatory regions, demonstrating both nucleosome mobilization and histone hyperacetylation, but lacked differences in restriction enzyme accessibility between transcriptionally active and inactive genes. Thus, although the histone modification pattern we observe is consistent with the spreading of histone modifying activity from the distant enhancer, the pattern of nucleosome mobilization is more compatible with direct contact between an enhancer and promoter.


1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5582-5592
Author(s):  
R J Nibbs ◽  
K Itoh ◽  
W Ostertag ◽  
P R Harrison

The ELM erythroleukemia is novel in that long-term survival of leukemic cells in culture (ELM-D cells) is dependent on contact with a bone marrow-derived stromal feeder cell layer. However, a number of stroma-independent (ELM-I) mutants that vary in their ability to differentiate in vitro in response to erythropoietin and interleukin-3 have been derived. We have attempted to define the genetic changes responsible for these different phenotypes. At the p53 locus in the primary leukemic cells, one copy of the gene has been lost whereas the other contains an 18-bp depletion, implicating its mutation as an early step in the development of the leukemia. Changes in ets gene expression have also been found. The Fli-1 gene region is rearranged in the primary tumor because of the insertion of a retrovirus inserted upstream of one Fli-1 allele, but this does not result in Fli-1 gene activation in any of the ELM-D or ELM-I cell lines except one. It seems significant that this line is the only one to have lost the ability to differentiate in response to erythropoietin. In addition, up-regulation of erg is associated with stromal cell-independent growth, since all ELM-I mutants have moderate levels of erg mRNA, whereas only low or undetectable levels are found in primary leukemic cells in vivo or in ELM-D cells in vitro. This up-regulation of erg mRNA seems to be important for stromal cell-independent growth, since ELM-D cells show elevated expression of the erg gene after separation from stromal cells. This seems to be made permanent in ELM-I mutants, since they do not down-regulate erg mRNA when grown in contact with stromal cells. We therefore propose that ets family members regulate both the survival and differentiation of erythroid cells.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document